ALTHOUSER. H. (1975) “Enhancing self-disclosure and cohesiveness in psychotherapy groups: an analogue study.” Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
2.
BEDNARR. L. and BATTERSBYC. P. (1976) “The effects of specific cognitive structure on early group development.”J. of Applied Behavior Science12: 513–522.
3.
BEDNARR. L. and KAULT. J. (1978) “Experiential group research: current perspectives,” in GarfieldS. L. and BugenA. E. (eds.) Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Approach. New York: John Wiley.
4.
BEDNARR. L., MELNICKJ., and KAULT. J. (1974) “Risk, responsibility, and structure: a conceptual framework for initiating group counseling and psychotherapy.”J. of Counseling Psychology21: 31–37.
5.
DAVISJ. D. (1976) “Self-disclosure in an acquaintance exercise: responsibility for level of intimacy. J. of Personality and Social Psychology33: 787–792.
6.
DIESR. R. and HESSA. K. (1971) “An experimental investigation of cohesiveness in marathon and conventional group psychotherapy.”J. of Abnormal Psychology77: 258–262.
7.
EVENSENP. E. and BEDNARR. L. (1978) “Effects of specific cognitive and behavioral structure on early group behavior and atmosphere.”J. of Counseling Psychology25: 66–75.
8.
GROSSE. F. (1957) “An empirical study of the concepts of cohesiveness and compatibility.” Honors thesis, Harvard University.
9.
HILLW. F. (1973) “Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM): conceptual framework for understanding groups,” pp. 159–176 in JonesJ. E. and PfeifferJ. W. (eds.) The 1973 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators. LaJolla, CA: University Associates.
10.
JACOBSA., JACOBSM., CAVIORN., and BURKEJ. (1974) “Anonymous feedback: credibility and desirability of structured emotional and behavioral feedback delivered in groups.”J. of Counseling Psychology21: 106–111.
11.
JACOBSM. (1977) “A comparison of publicly delivered and anonymously delivered verbal feedback in brief personal growth groups.”J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology45: 385–390.
12.
JACOBSM.JACOBSA., FELDMANG., and CAVIORN. (1973) “Feedback II - the “credibility gap”: delivery of positive and negative and emotional and behavioral feedback in groups.”J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology41: 215–223.
13.
KIMBALLR. L. (1973) “Effects of some pretherapy manipulating on measures of group cohesion.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
14.
KIRSHNERB. J., DIESR. R., and BROWNR. A. (1978) “Effects of experimental manipulation of self-disclosure on group cohesiveness.”J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology46: 1171–1177.
15.
LEEF., and BEDNARR. L. (1977) “Effects of group structure and risk-taking disposition on group behavior, attitudes, and atmosphere.”J. of Counseling Psychology24: 191–199.
16.
LUNDGREND. C. (1971) “Trainer style and patterns of group development.”J. of Applied Behavior Science1: 689–709.
17.
QUERYW. T. (1964) “Self-disclosure as a variable in group psychotherapy.”Int. J. of Group Psychotherapy14: 107–115.
18.
RIBNERN. G. (1974) “Effects of an explicit group contract on self-disclosure and group cohesiveness.”J. of Counseling Psychology21: 116–120.
19.
SCHAIBLET. and JACOBSA. (1975) “Feedback III: enhancement of feedback and acceptance and group attractiveness by manipulation of the sequence and solence of feedback.”Small Group Behavior6: 151–173.
20.
SCHUTZW. C. (1966) The Interpersonal Underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
21.
STOKESJ. P. (forthcoming) “Intermember attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking as components of cohesion.”Small Group Behavior.
22.
TAYLORD. A. and ALTMANI. (1966) “Intimacy-scaled stimuli for use in studies of interpersonal relationships.” Research Report 9. Bethesda, MD: Naval Medical Research Institute.
23.
WHALENC. (1969) “Effects of a model and instructions on group verbal behavior.”J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology33: 509–521.
24.
YALOMI. D. (1975) The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.