Drawing on team-level cognitive appraisal theory, we develop and test a theoretical model that explicates whether, when, and how team reflexivity translates into team boundary-spanning behavior (TBSB). We argue that team reflexivity is a team-level stressor that shapes TBSB through distinct appraisal processes. Specifically, we examine the mediating roles of challenge and hindrance appraisals, as well as the moderating role of empowering leadership. Using multi-source, multi-wave data from 591 members nested in 140 teams, our results show that team reflexivity promotes TBSB via challenge appraisal while undermining it via hindrance appraisal. Moreover, empowering leadership conditions these relationships.
AguinisH.EdwardsJ. R. (2014). Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 143–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12058
2.
AhearneM.MathieuJ.RappA. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
3.
AldrichH.HerkerD. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.
4.
AmundsenS.MartinsenØ. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009
5.
AnconaD. G.CaldwellD. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.EuwemaM. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170
8.
BarsadeS. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
9.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Center for Leadership Studies.
10.
BlieseP. (2000). Within-group agreement, non–independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In KozlowskiS. W. J.KleinK. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extension, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey–Bass.
11.
BreugstN.PrellerR.PatzeltH.ShepherdD. A. (2018). Information reliability and team reflection as contingencies of the relationship between information elaboration and team decision quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2298
12.
CarterS. M.WestM. A. (1998). Reflexivity, effectiveness and mental health in BBC production teams. Small Group Research, 29(5), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498295003
13.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1998). On self-regulation of behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CasperA.WehrtW. (2022). The role of recovery for morning cognitive appraisal of work demands: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000285
15.
CavanaughM. A.BoswellW. R.RoehlingM. V.BoudreauJ. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
16.
CheongM.SpainS. M.YammarinoF. J.YunS. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.006
17.
CheongM.YammarinoF. J.DionneS. D.SpainS. M.TsaiC. (2019). A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.005
18.
ChongD. S.Van EerdeW.ChaiK. H.RutteC. G. (2011). A double-edged sword: The effects of challenge and hindrance time pressure on new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2048914
De DreuC. K. (2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320244000175
21.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A.Van KnippenbergD. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
22.
de la Torre-RuizJ. M.Aragón-CorreaJ. A. (2013). Interdependence between best team members and their teammates. International Journal of Manpower, 34(5), 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2013-0121
DietzB.van KnippenbergD.HirstG.RestubogS. L. D. (2015). Outperforming whom? A multilevel study of performance-prove goal orientation, performance, and the moderating role of shared team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038888
25.
DongY.SeoM. G.BartolK. M. (2014). No pain, no gain: An affect-based model of developmental job experience and the buffering effects of emotional intelligence. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1056–1077. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0687
26.
Drach-ZahavyA.FreundA. (2007). Team effectiveness under stress: A structural contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(4), 423–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.430
27.
DuJ.ChenZ. (2018). Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in strategic management under a “VUCA” environment: Evidence from high tech companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.03.003
28.
EddyE. R.TannenbaumS. I.MathieuJ. E. (2013). Helping teams to help themselves: Comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Personnel Psychology, 66, 975–1008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12041
29.
EschlemanK. J.AlarconG. M.LyonsJ. B.StokesC. K.SchneiderT. (2012). The dynamic nature of the stress appraisal process and the infusion of affect. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.601299
30.
FarajS.YanA. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014367
31.
FengX.HanP.LongT. (2024). Teams’ stressors and flow experience: An energy-based perspective and the role of team mindfulness. Journal of Business Research, 183, 114860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114860
32.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.1.150
33.
FuN.FloodP. C.RousseauD. M.MorrisT. (2021). Resolving the individual helping and objective job performance dilemma: The moderating effect of team reflexivity. Journal of Business Research, 129, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.058
34.
GumpB. B.KulikJ. A. (1997). Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.305
35.
GuoZ. A.HeidlR. A.HollenbeckJ. R.YuA.HoweM. (2022). When discretionary boundary spanning relationships cease becoming discretionary: The impact of closed ties on informal leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(6), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000911
36.
GuzzoR. A.DicksonM. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486
39.
HillN. S.BartolK. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12108
40.
HirstG.MannL. (2004). A model of R&D leadership and team communication: The relationship with project performance. R&D Management, 34(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00330.x
41.
JiH.YanJ. (2020). How team structure can enhance performance: Team longevity’s moderating effect and team coordination’s mediating effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01873
42.
JiangY.JacksonS. E.ColakogluS. (2016). An empirical examination of personal learning within the context of teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2058
43.
JoshiA.PandeyN.HanG. (2009). Bracketing team boundary spanning: An examination of task-based, team-level, and contextual antecedents. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 731–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.567
44.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
45.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
46.
KeiserN. L.ArthurW. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 1007–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000821
47.
KeiserN. L.ArthurW. (2022). A meta-analysis of task and training characteristics that contribute to or attenuate the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief). Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(5), 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09784-x.
48.
KirkmanB. L.RosenB. (1997). A model of work team empowerment. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 10, pp. 131–167). JAI Press.
49.
KirkmanB. L.RosenB. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
50.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
51.
KongD. T.ParkS.PengJ. (2023). Appraising and reacting to perceived pay for performance: Leader competence and warmth as critical contingencies. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 402–431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.0209
52.
KonradtU.OtteK.SchippersM. C.SteenfattC. (2016). Reflexivity in teams: A review and new perspectives. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977
53.
KozlowskiS. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614533586
54.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
55.
LebelR. D.YangX.ParkerS. K.Kamran-MorleyD. (2023). What makes you proactive can burn you out: The downside of proactive skill building motivated by financial precarity and fear. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(7), 1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001063
56.
LeblancP. M.HarveyJ. F.RousseauV. (2024). A meta-analysis of team reflexivity: Antecedents, outcomes, and boundary conditions. Human Resource Management Review, 34(4), 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101042
57.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2007). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
58.
LeeA.WillisS.TianA. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220
59.
LePineJ. A.PodsakoffN. P.LePineM. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
60.
LePineM. A.ZhangY.CrawfordE. R.RichB. L. (2016). Turning their pain to gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1036–1059. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0778
61.
LiN.ZhaoH. H.WalterS. L.ZhangX.-A.YuJ. (2015). Achieving more with less: Extra milers’ behavioral influences in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000010
62.
LiP.TarisT. W.PeetersM. C. (2022). Today’s challenge may be tomorrow’s hindrance (and vice versa): Longitudinal changes in employee’s appraisals of job demands and their outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95(2), 521–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12384
63.
LiY.LiN.LiC.LiJ. (2020). The boon and bane of creative “stars”: A social network exploration of how and when team creativity is (and is not) driven by a star teammate. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0283
64.
LiuF.LiP.TarisT. W.PeetersM. C. W. (2022). Creative performance pressure as a double-edged sword for creativity: The role of appraisals and resources. Human Resource Management, 61(6), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22116
65.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2013). Work motivation: The high performance cycle. In KleinbeckU.QuastH.-H.ThierryH.HäckerH.QuastH. H. (Eds.), Work motivation (pp. 3–25). Psychology Press.
66.
LyubovnikovaJ.LegoodA.TurnerN.MamakoukaA. (2017). How authentic leadership influences team performance: The mediating role of team reflexivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2692-3
67.
MaceyW. H.SchneiderB. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
68.
MarroneJ. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353945
69.
MarroneJ. A.QuigleyN. R.PrussiaG. E.DienhartJ. (2022). Can supportive coaching behaviors facilitate boundary spanning and raise job satisfaction? An indirect-effects model. Journal of Management, 48(5), 1131–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211003951
70.
MarroneJ. A.TeslukP. E.CarsonJ. B. (2007). A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1423–1439. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28225967
71.
McCraeR. R. (1984). Situational determinants of coping responses: Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.919
72.
MellJ. N.van KnippenbergD.van GinkelW. P.HeugensP. P. (2022). From boundary spanning to intergroup knowledge integration: The role of boundary spanners’ metaknowledge and proactivity. Journal of Management Studies, 59(7), 1723–1755. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12797
73.
MitchellM. S.GreenbaumR. L.VogelR. M.MawritzM. B.KeatingD. J. (2019). Can you handle the pressure? The effect of performance pressure on stress appraisals, self-regulation, and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0646
74.
MorelandR. L.McMinnJ. G. (2010). Group reflexivity and performance. In ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 27, pp. 63–95). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-6145(2010)0000027006
75.
MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893935
76.
NiD.ZhengX.LiangL. H. (2022). Rethinking the role of team mindfulness in team relationship conflict: A conflict management perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(5), 878–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2588
77.
OregS.SverdlikN.PaineJ. W.SeoM. G. (2024). Activation and valence in responses to organizational change: Development and validation of the change response circumplex scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001132
78.
OtteK. P.KonradtU.OldewemeM. (2018). Effective team reflection: The role of quality and quantity. Small Group Research, 49(6), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418804898
79.
PearsallM. J.EllisA. P.SteinJ. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002
80.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B. (1994). An examination of the psychometric properties and nomological validity of some revised and reduced substitutes for leadership scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.79.5.702
81.
RazinskasS.HoeglM. (2020). A multilevel review of stressor research in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2420
82.
RazinskasS.WeissM.HoeglM.BaerM. (2022). Illuminating opposing performance effects of stressors in innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 351–370.
83.
SacramentoC. A.FayD.WestM. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008
84.
SalasE.DriskellJ. E.HughesS. (1996). Introduction: The study of stress and human performance. In DriskellJ. E.SalasE. (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 1–46). Erlbaum.
85.
SchippersM. C.Den HartogD. N.KoopmanP. L.Van KnippenbergD. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61(11), 1593–1616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708096639
86.
SchippersM. C.EdmondsonA. C.WestM. A. (2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures. Small Group Research, 45(6), 731–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414553473
87.
SchippersM. C.RusD. C. (2021). Optimizing decision-making processes in times of COVID-19: Using reflexivity to counteract information-processing failures. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 650525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650525
88.
SchippersM. C.WestM. A.DawsonJ. F. (2015). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, 41(3), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441210
89.
SchneiderT. R.RiversS. E.LyonsJ. B. (2009). The biobehavioral model of persuasion: Generating challenge appraisals to promote health. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(8), 1928–1952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00510.x
90.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
91.
TjosvoldD.LawK. S.SunH. (2006). Effectiveness of Chinese teams: The role of conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00040.x
92.
UrbachT.FayD.GoralA. (2010). Extending the job design perspective on individual innovation: Exploring the effect of group reflexivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X479394
93.
van GinkelW.TindaleR. S.van KnippenbergD. (2009). Team reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and the use of distributed information in group decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(4), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016045
94.
VecchioR. P.JustinJ. E.PearceC. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.014
95.
WangZ.RenS.ChadeeD.LiuM.CaiS. (2021). Team reflexivity and employee innovative behavior: The mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1619–1639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2020-0683
96.
WestM. A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In WestM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555–579). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00267.x.
97.
WestM. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In BeyerleinM. M.JohnsonD. A.BeyerleinS. T. (Eds.), Product development teams (pp. 1–29). JAI Press.
98.
XieX. Y.WeiJ.HuQ.LiaoZ. (2023). Is the door really open? A contingent model of boundary spanning behavior and abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Business Research, 169, 114284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114284
99.
XuX. M.DuD.JohnsonR. E.LuC. Q. (2022). Justice change matters: Approach and avoidance mechanisms underlying the regulation of justice over time. Journal of Applied psychology, 107(7), 1070–1093. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000973
100.
YangM.WangJ.ZhangX. (2021). Boundary-spanning search and sustainable competitive advantage: The mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Journal of Business Research, 127, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.032
101.
ZhangQ.LiJ. (2021). Can employee’s boundary-spanning behavior exactly promote innovation performance? The roles of creative ideas generation and team task interdependence. International Journal of Manpower, 42(6), 1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2019-0302.
