In high-risk industries such as coal mining, ensuring safety behaviour among workers is critical. Growing workforce diversity in mining enterprises has led to the emergence of team faultlines—hypothetical dividing lines that split teams into internally homogeneous subgroups—which may impact team functioning and individual safety behaviours. Drawing on faultlines theory, social identity theory, and conservation of resources theory, this study investigates how workgroup faultlines influence miners’ safety behaviour through the mediating roles of emotional exhaustion and safety self-efficacy. A multilevel, time-lagged survey design was employed, with data collected from 1,202 coal miners nested within 65 teams. Results from multilevel structural equation modelling indicated that stronger team faultlines were associated with higher emotional exhaustion and lower safety self-efficacy, both of which predicted lower safety behaviour. Furthermore, emotional exhaustion and safety self-efficacy sequentially mediated the relationship between faultlines and safety behaviour. These findings extend faultline research into blue-collar settings and highlight the importance of addressing subgroup dynamics to promote worker safety.
AntinoM.RicoR.ThatcherS. M. B. (2019). Structuring reality through the faultlines lens: The effects of structure, fairness, and status conflict on the activated faultlines–performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1444–1470. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0054
2.
BanduraA. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
3.
BezrukovaK.JehnK. A.ZanuttoE. L.ThatcherS. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0379
4.
ChenC. F.ChenS. C. (2014). Measuring the effects of safety management system practices, morality leadership and self-efficacy on pilots’ safety behaviors: Safety motivation as a mediator. Safety Science, 62, 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.013
5.
ChenY.HuangW.LiH. (2022). Relationship between error management climate and workers’ safety performance in construction enterprises. China Safety Science Journal, 32(5), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.05.1754
6.
CramtonC.HindsP. J. (2004). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning?Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26006-3
7.
DurandF.BourgeaultI. L.HebertR. L.FleuryM.-J. (2022). The role of gender, profession and informational role self-efficacy in physician–nurse knowledge sharing and decision-making. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 36(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1890006
8.
EarleyP. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393495
9.
GuoY. Y.LiJ. Z. (2023). The effect of emotional intelligence on unsafe behavior of miners: The role of emotional labor strategies and perceived organizational support. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(2), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2055920
10.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Springer.
11.
HaslamS. A.McMahonC.CruwysT.HaslamC.JettenJ.SteffensN. K. (2018). Social cure, what social cure? The propensity to underestimate the importance of social factors for health. Social Science & Medicine, 198, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.020
12.
HobfollS. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
13.
HuJ.LidenR. C. (2015). Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1102–1127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1142
14.
Katz-NavonT.NavehE.SternZ. (2007). Safety self-efficacy and safety performance: Potential antecedents and the moderation effect of standardization. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 20(7), 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860710822716
15.
LauD. C.MurnighanJ. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533229
16.
LewisK. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
MataK. K. C.TarrojaM. C. H. (2022). Impact of emotional exhaustion and self-efficacy on the psychological well-being of child care workers in the Philippines. Psychological Studies, 67(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00662-x
19.
MeyerB. (2017). Team diversity. In SalasE.RicoR.PassmoreJ. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes (pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118909997.ch7
20.
MeyerB.GlenzA. (2013). Team faultline measures: A computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484970
21.
MeyerB.SchermulyC. C.KauffeldS. (2016). That’s not my place: The interacting effects of faultlines, subgroup size, and social competence on social loafing behaviour in work groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.996554
22.
MeyerB.ShemlaM.LiJ.WeggeJ. (2015). On the same side of the faultline: Inclusion in the leader’s subgroup and employee performance. Journal of Management Studies, 52(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12118
23.
MoserS.ReinwaldM.KunzeF. (2023). Does my leader care about my subgroup? A multilevel model of team faultlines, LMX quality, and employee absenteeism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2136522
24.
NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021484
25.
NealA.GriffinM. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
26.
NishiiL. H.GoncaloJ. A. (2008). Demographic faultlines and creativity in diverse groups. In PhillipsK. W. (Ed.), Diversity and groups (Vol. 11, pp. 1–26). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-0856(08)11001-5
27.
NykänenM.Salmela-AroK.TolvanenA.VuoriJ. (2019). Safety self-efficacy and internal locus of control as mediators of safety motivation – Randomized controlled trial (RCT) study. Safety Science, 117, 330–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.037
28.
PearsallM. J.EllisA. P. J.EvansJ. M. (2008). Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key?Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.225
29.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
30.
PorterC. O. L. H.WangE.EllisA. P. J. (2022). Performance and turnover consequences of goal orientation faultlines: A self-in-social-setting view. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 12641. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2022.347
31.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
SawyerJ. E.HouletteM. A.YeagleyE. L. (2006). Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006
34.
SchulteN.GötzF. M.PartschF.GoldmannT.SmidtL.MeyerB. (2020) Linking diversity and mental health: Task conflict mediates between perceived subgroups and emotional exhaustion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01245
35.
ShemlaM.MeyerB.GreerL.JehnK. A. (2016). A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team’s composition affect team processes and outcomes?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(Suppl. 1), S89–S106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1957
36.
ShinS. J.ZhouJ. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709–1721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709
37.
ShiromA. (1989). Burnout in work organizations. In CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1989 (pp. 25–48). John Wiley & Sons.
38.
SpectorP. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
39.
SpoelmaT. M.EllisA. P. J. (2017). Fuse or fracture? Threat as a moderator of the effects of diversity faultlines in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1344–1359. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000231
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
42.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In JostJ. T.SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
43.
ThatcherS. M. B.MeyerB.KimY.PatelP. C. (2024). A meta-analytic integration of the faultlines literature. Organizational Psychology Review, 14(2), 238–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231225064
44.
ThatcherS. M.PatelP. C. (2011). Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024167
45.
ThatcherS. M.PatelP. C. (2012). Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 969–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311426187
46.
TiedeK. E.SchultheisS. K.MeyerB. (2021). Subgroup splits in diverse work teams: Subgroup perceptions but not demographic faultlines affect team identification and emotional exhaustion. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 595720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595720
47.
van der KampM.TjemkesB. V.JehnK. A. (2015). Faultline deactivation: Dealing with activated faultlines and conflicts in global teams. In WildmanJ. L.GriffithR. L. (Eds.), Leading global teams: Translating multidisciplinary science to practice (pp. 269–293). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1_12
48.
WatkinsM. B.RenR.UmphressE. E.BoswellW. R.TrianaM. D. C.ZardkoohiA. (2015). Compassion organizing: Employees’ satisfaction with corporate philanthropic disaster response and reduced job strain. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(2), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12088
49.
WeggeJ.RothC.NeubachB.SchmidtK. H.KanferR. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1301–1313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012680
50.
ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450
