This study examines the relationship between participation and perceived influence across three meetings. Groups were asked to take on the role of an advisory committee to a local court charged with making recommendations for capital cases in which the defendant claimed diminished mental capacity. After discussing each case, participants were asked to provide round-robin ratings for perceived influence. Speaking turn was used to measure participation. Results indicate the relationship between participation and perceived influence was stable across meetings but that it varied across groups. Discussion addresses the theoretical and practical implications of shared influence perceptions over time.
BalesR. F. (1950a). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086790
2.
BalesR. F. (1950b). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Addison-Wesley.
3.
BergerJ.WagnerD. G.WebsterM. (2014). Expectation states theory: Growth, opportunities and challenges. In ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 31, pp. 19–55). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-614520140000031000
BonitoJ. A. (2026). Interaction in small groups. In ReimerT.FlorackA.Van SwolL. M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of communication and social cognition (pp. 113–123). Routledge.
6.
BonitoJ. A.DecampM. H.RuppelE. K. (2008). The process of information sharing in small groups: Application of a local model. Communication Monographs, 75(2), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802082078
7.
BonitoJ. A.ErvinJ. N.StaggsS. M. (2016). Estimation and application of the latent group model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20(3), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000044
8.
BonitoJ. A.GastilJ.ErvinJ. N.MeyersR. A. (2014). At the convergence of input and process models of group discussion: A comparison of participation rates across time, persons, and groups. Communication Monographs, 81(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.883081
9.
BonitoJ. A.HollingsheadA. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In BurlesonB. R. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (Vol. 20, pp. 227–261). Sage.
10.
BonitoJ. A.KennyD. A. (2010). The measurement of reliability of social relations components from round-robin designs. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01274.x
11.
BonitoJ. A.KeytonJ.ErvinJ. N. (2017). Role-related participation in product design teams: Individual- and group-level trends. Communication Research, 44(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618759
12.
BonitoJ. A.MeyersR. A. (2011). Examining functional communication as egocentric or group-centric: Application of a latent group model. Communication Monographs, 78(4), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.618138
13.
BonitoJ. A.RuppelE. K. (2011). An application of the socioegocentric model to information-sharing discussions: In search of group-level communication influences. Communication Research, 38(3), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377195
14.
BorgattaE. F.BalesR. F. (1953). Interaction of individuals in reconstituted groups. Sociometry, 16(4), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785935
15.
BottgerP. C. (1984). Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.214
16.
CarlettaJ. (2007). Unleashing the killer corpus: Experiences in creating the multi-everything AMI Meeting Corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-007-9040-x
17.
CorrellS. J.RidgewayC. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In DelamaterJ. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. (pp. 29–51). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
18.
ErvinJ. N.BonitoJ. A. (2014). A review and critique of partner effect research in small groups. Small Group Research, 45(6), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414551027
19.
ErvinJ. N.BonitoJ. A.KeytonJ. (2017). Convergence of intrapersonal and interpersonal processes across group meetings. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1185136
20.
FişekM. H.BergerJ.NormanR. Z. (1991). Participation in heterogeneous and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1086/229742
21.
GerpottF. H.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.VoelpelS. C.van VugtM. (2019). It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Academic Press.
24.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
25.
HoffmanL. R.KleinmanG. B. (1994). Individual and group in group problem solving the valence model redressed. Human Communication Research, 21(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00338.x
26.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Guilford Press.
27.
KennyD. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3
28.
KennyD. A. (2019). Interpersonal perception: The foundation of social relationships (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
29.
KennyD. A.La VoieL. (1984). The social-relations model. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141–182). Academic Press.
30.
KnottnerusJ. D. (1997). Social structural analysis and status generalization: The contributions and potential of expectation states theory. In SzmatkaJ.SkvoretzJ.BergerJ. (Eds.), Status, network, and structure: Theory development in group processes (pp. 119–136). Stanford University Press.
31.
KozlowskiS. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614533586
32.
KozlowskiS. W. J.KleinK. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
33.
LanajK.HollenbeckJ. R. (2015). Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1476–1494. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0303
MarcusD. K. (1998). Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.230
36.
McNeishD.HamakerE. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods, 25(5), 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000250
37.
MulderJ. D.HamakerE. L. (2021). Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738
38.
ParkerK. C. (1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 965–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.965
39.
PetersM.LecciL. (2012). Predicting verdicts, adherence to judge’s instructions, and assumptions about the disposition of the defendant in a case involving the insanity defense. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(9), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.566872
40.
SacksH.SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
41.
SandersR. E. (1987). Cognitive foundations of calculated speech. SUNY Press.
42.
SandersR. E. (1997). The production of symbolic objects as components of larger wholes. In GreeneJ. O. (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 245–278). Erlbaum.
43.
SandersR. E.BonitoJ. A. (2010). Speaking for the institution: A fourth production site for group members’ influence attempts. Small Group Research, 41(4), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410366309
44.
SchönbrodtF. D.BackM. D.SchmukleS. C. (2012). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0150-4
45.
ShellyR. K.TroyerL. (2001a). Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090157
46.
ShellyR. K.TroyerL. (2001b). Speech duration and dependencies in initially structured and unstructured task groups. Sociological Perspectives, 44(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2001.44.4.419
47.
SkvoretzJ. (1981). Extending expectation states theory: Comparative status models of participation in N-person groups. Social Forces, 59(3), 752–770.
48.
SorrentinoR. M.BoutillierR. G. (1975). The effect of quantity and quality of verbal interaction on ratings of leadership ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(5), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90044-X
49.
StapletonL. M.JohnsonT. L. (2019). Models to examine the validity of cluster-level factor structure using individual-level data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919855039
50.
StasserG. (2000). Information distribution, participation and group decision: Explorations with the DISCUSS and SPEAK models. In IlgenD. R.HulinC. L. (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 135–156). American Psychological Association.
51.
StasserG.StewartD. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426
52.
StasserG.TaylorL. A. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.675
53.
StasserG.TaylorL. A.HannaC. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.67
WalkerK. L.StohlC. (2012). Communicating in a collaborating group: A longitudinal network analysis. Communication Monographs, 79(4), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.723810
