Rapport plays a key role in small group interaction, yet there remain gaps in understanding the construct. The current study examined whether initial group rapport among triads of strangers could predict later social bonding and group emotion. Results indicated that initial group rapport reliably predicted subsequent social bonding and emotional experience across multiple measures. These findings support use of global thin slice rapport measures in small groups. Further, they suggest that rapport can be assessed reliably within the first minute of meeting and that ratings of group experience in just this first minute offer valuable insight into subsequent group formation.
AmbadyN.BernieriF. J.RichesonJ. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). Academic Press.
2.
AmbadyN.GrayH. M. (2002). On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.947
3.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
4.
BakerZ. G.WatlingtonE. M.KneeC. R. (2020). The role of rapport in satisfying one’s basic psychological needs. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09819-5
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
BernieriF.GillisJ. S. (1995). The judgment of rapport: A cross-cultural comparison between Americans and Greeks. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02173170
7.
BernieriF. J. (1988). Coordinated movement in human interaction: Synchrony, posture similarity, and rapport (Publication No. 8901540) [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
8.
BernieriF. J. (2005). The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words. In ManusovV. (Ed.), The expression of rapport (pp. 347–359). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
9.
BernieriF. J.DavisJ. M.RosenthalR.KneeC. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294203008
10.
BernieriF. J.GillisJ. S. (2001). Judging rapport: Employing Brunswik’s lens model to study interpersonal sensitivity. In HallJ. A.BernieriF. J. (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 67–88). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
11.
BernieriF. J.GillisJ. S.DavisJ. M.GraheJ. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.110
12.
Blanch-HartiganD.RubenM. A.HallJ. A.Schmid MastM. (2018). Measuring nonverbal behavior in clinical interactions: A pragmatic guide. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(12), 2209–2218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.013
13.
BollenK. A.HoyleR. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579670
14.
BrownW. M.PalametaB.MooreC. (2003). Are there nonverbal cues to commitment? An exploratory study using the zero-acquaintance video presentation paradigm. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 42–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490300100104
15.
CheongJ. H.MolaniZ.SadhukhaS.ChangL. J. (2020). Synchronized affect in shared experiences strengthens social connection. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bd9wn
16.
ChinW. W.SalisburyW. D.PearsonA. W.StollakM. J. (1999). Perceived cohesion in small groups: Adapting and testing the perceived cohesion scale in a small-group setting. Small Group Research, 30(6), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000605
17.
CreswellK. G.SayetteM. A.ManuckS. B.FerrellR. E.HillS. Y.DimoffJ. D. (2012). DRD4 polymorphism moderates the effect of alcohol consumption on social bonding. PLoS One, 7(2), e28914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028914 Article e28914.
EkmanP. (1989). The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. In WagnerH.MansteadA. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychophysiology (pp. 143–164). John Wiley & Sons.
20.
EkmanP.DavidsonR. J.FriesenW. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 342–353. citation1990/02/01 00:00Ekman P
21.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
22.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V.HagerJ. C. (2002). Facial action coding system on CD-ROM. Network Information Research.
23.
EvansN. J.JarvisP. A. (1986). The group attitude scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700205
24.
FairbairnC. E.SayetteM. A.LevineJ. M.CohnJ. F.CreswellK. G. (2013). The effects of alcohol on the emotional displays of whites in interracial groups. Emotion, 13(3), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030934
25.
FrankM. G.EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1993). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.1.83
26.
FrankM. G.SolbuA. (2020). Social intelligence and nonverbal communication. In SternbergR. J.KostićA. (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Evolution and today (pp. 119–162). Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
28.
GillisJ. S.BernieriF. J.WootenE. (1995). The effects of stimulus medium and feedback on the judgment of rapport. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1059
29.
GoldenbergA.GarciaD.HalperinE.GrossJ. J. (2020). Collective emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420901574
30.
GonzagaG. C.KeltnerD.LondahlE. A.SmithM. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.247
31.
GraheJ. E.BernieriF. J. (1999). The importance of nonverbal cues in judging rapport. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021698725361
32.
HallJ. A.RoterD. L.BlanchD. C.FrankelR. M. (2009). Observer-rated rapport in interactions between medical students and standardized patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 76(3), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.009
33.
HumanL. J.SandstromG. M.BiesanzJ. C.DunnE. W. (2013). Accurate first impressions leave a lasting impression: The long-term effects of distinctive self-other agreement on relationship development. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(4), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612463735
34.
IckesW.GonzalezR. (1994). Social” cognition and social cognition: From the subjective to the intersubjective. Small Group Research, 25(2), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494252008
KirchnerT. R.SayetteM. A.CohnJ. F.MorelandR. L.LevineJ. M. (2006). Effects of alcohol on group formation among male social drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(5), 785–793. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.785
37.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
38.
LearyM. R.KowalskiR. M. (1995). Social anxiety. Guilford Press.
39.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1998). Small groups. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 415–469). McGraw-Hill.
MilmoeS.RosenthalR.BlaneH. T.ChafetzM. E.WolfI. (1967). The doctor's voice: Postdictor of successful referral of alcoholic patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024219
42.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. University of Chicago Press.
43.
SAS Institute. (2020). SAS software (Version 9.4). Computer software.
44.
SavilleA.BalasB. (2014). Detecting personal familiarity depends on static frames in “thin slices” of behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1537–1543. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0629-y
45.
SayetteM. A.CreswellK. G.DimoffJ. D.FairbairnC. E.CohnJ. F.HeckmanB. W.KirchnerT. R.LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (2012). Alcohol and group formation: A multimodal investigation of the effects of alcohol on emotion and social bonding. Psychological Science, 23(8), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435134
Tickle-DegnenL.RosenthalR. (1987). Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 113–136). SAGE Publications.
VerkuilenJ.SmithsonM. (2012). Mixed and mixture regression models for continuous bounded responses using the beta distribution. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(1), 82–113. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998610396895
WilsonJ. H.RyanR. G.PughJ. L. (2010). Professor–student rapport scale predicts student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 37(4), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.510976
54.
XuX. S.SamtaniM. N.DunneA.NandyP.VermeulenA.De RidderF. (2013). Mixed-effects beta regression for modeling continuous bounded outcome scores using NONMEM when data are not on the boundaries. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 40(4), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-013-9318-0
55.
ZimprichD. (2010). Modeling change in skewed variables using mixed beta regression models. Research in Human Development, 7(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.f1080/15427600903578136
