Although substantive research examining work teams continues to grow, methodological research examining the collection of team survey data lags behind substantive progress. To address this research gap, we test how individual and team characteristics affect one’s likelihood of completing a team survey. Using multilevel ordinal logistic regression analysis of human resources information systems data and survey responses from 3,403 clinical staff within 900 multidisciplinary healthcare teams, we found that time dedicated to the team, leadership status, and team size relate to response behavior, with differential effects for men and women. We discuss implications for team research in real-world organizational contexts.
AllenN. J.StanleyD. J.WilliamsH. M.RossS. J. (2007). Assessing the impact of nonresponse on work group diversity effects. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428106%2F294731
2.
AlnuaimiO. A.RobertL. P.MarupingL. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270109
3.
AnseelF.LievensF.SchollaertE.ChoragwickaB. (2010). Response rates in organizational science, 1995–2008: A meta-analytic review and guidelines for survey researchers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9157-6
4.
AtwaterL. E.CareyJ. A.WaldmanD. A. (2001). Gender and discipline in the workplace: Wait until your father gets home. Journal of Management, 27(5), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700503
BarrC. D.SpitzmüllerC.StuebingK. K. (2008). Too stressed out to participate? Examining the relation between stressors and survey response behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.3.232
7.
BaruchY.HoltomB. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
8.
BrescollV. L.UhlmannE. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/e514412014-379
9.
BreugstN.PrellerR.PatzeltH.ShepherdD. A. (2018). Information reliability and team reflection as contingencies of the relationship between information elaboration and team decision quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2298
10.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
11.
CascioW. F. (2012). Methodological issues in international HR management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(12), 2532–2545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561242
12.
CrawfordE. R.LepineJ. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0206
13.
CycyotaC. S.HarrisonD. A. (2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280770
14.
DebusM. E.FritzC.PhilippM. (2019). A story of gains and losses: Intra-individual shifts in job characteristics and well-being when transitioning to a managerial role. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(5), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9604-3
15.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
16.
Den HartogD. N.De HooghA. H.KeeganA. E. (2007). The interactive effects of belongingness and charisma on helping and compliance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1131–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1131
17.
EaglyA. H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In KnippenbergD. V.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 79–93). SAGE.
18.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685
EaglyA. H.MakhijaniM. G.KlonskyB. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
21.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
22.
EarpM.HazizaD. (2018). Comparison of weighting procedures in the presence of unit nonresponse: A simulation study based on data from the American Time Use Survey. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Survey Methods Research. https://stats.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2018/pdf/st180130.pdf
23.
EdmondsonC. V. (2006). Organizational surveys: A system for employee voice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(4), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600908526
24.
EneM.LeightonE. A.BlueG. L.BellB. A. (2015, April 26–29). Multilevel models for categorical data using SAS PROC GLIMMIX: The basics [Paper presentation]. SAS Global Forum 2015 Proceedings, Dallas, TX, (pp. 1–12). https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings15/3430-2015.pdf
25.
FauthT.HattrupK.MuellerK.RobertsB. (2013). Nonresponse in employee attitude surveys: A group-level analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(1), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10869-012-9260-y
26.
FrameM. C.RobertoK. J.SchwabA. E.HarrisC. T. (2010). What is important on the job? Differences across gender, perspective, and job level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00562.x
27.
FultonB. R. (2018). Organizations and survey research: Implementing response enhancing strategies and conducting nonresponse analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(2), 240–276. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124115626169
28.
GladsteinD. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392936
GrovesR. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033
31.
GrovesR. M.PresserS.DipkoS. (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh002
32.
GuzzoR. A.SalasE. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. Jossey-Bass.
33.
HackmanJ. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Press.
34.
HeggestadE. D.RogelbergS.GohA.OswaldF. L. (2015). Considering the effects of nonresponse on correlations between surveyed variables. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000129
35.
HollenbeckJ. R.BeersmaB.SchoutenM. E. (2012). Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0181
36.
HuangJ. L.CurranP. G.KeeneyJ.PoposkiE. M.DeShonR. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8
37.
JussimL.EcclesJ.MadonS. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 281–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60240-3
38.
KidderD. L. (2002). The influence of gender on the performance of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 28(5), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800504
39.
KnudsenH. K.DucharmeL. J.RomanP. M. (2009). Turnover intention and emotional exhaustion” at the top”: Adapting the job demands-resources model to leaders of addiction treatment organizations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013822
40.
KozlowskiS. W.ChaoG. T. (2018). Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. American Psychologist, 73(4), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245
41.
LataneB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
44.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1998). Small groups: An overview. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 415–469). McGraw-Hill.
45.
LiangJ.ShuR.FarhC. I. C. (2019). Differential implications of team member promotive and prohibitive voice on innovation performance in research and development project teams: A dialectic perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2325
46.
LucianoM. M.BartelsA. L.D’InnocenzoL.MaynardM. T.MathieuJ. E. (2018). Shared team experiences and team effectiveness: Unpacking the contingent effects of entrained rhythms and task characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1403–1430. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0828
47.
MaloneyM. M.JohnsonS. G.Zellmer-BruhnM. E. (2010). Assessing group-level constructs under missing data conditions: A Monte Carlo simulation. Small Group Research, 41(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1046496410363829
48.
MathieuJ. E.HollenbeckJ. R.van KnippenbergD.IlgenD. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128
49.
MathieuJ. E.WolfsonM. A.ParkS. (2018). The evolution of work team research since Hawthorne. American Psychologist, 73(4), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000255
McGrathJ. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14). Prentice-Hall.
52.
MeschD. J.BrownM. S.MooreZ. I.HayatA. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.432
OkhuysenG. A.BechkyB. A. (2009). Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047533
55.
O’LearyM. B.MortensenM.WoolleyA. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0275
56.
O’ReillyC. A.RobertsK. H. (1977). Task group structure, communication, and effectiveness in three organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(6), 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.6.674
57.
PorterS. R.WhitcombM. E. (2005). Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics, engagement and personality. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 127–152. http://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11162-004-1597-2
58.
PorterS. R.WhitcombM. E.WeitzerW. H. (2004). Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004(121), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.101
59.
RappT. L.MathieuJ. E. (2019). Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000344
60.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE.
61.
RogelbergS. G.ConwayJ. M.SederburgM. E.SpitzmüllerC.AzizS.KnightW. E. (2003). Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1104
62.
RogelbergS. G.LuongA. (1998). Nonresponse to mailed surveys: A review and guide. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175675
63.
RogelbergS. G.LuongA.SederburgM. E.CristolD. S. (2000) Employee attitude surveys: Examining the attitudes of noncompliant employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.284
64.
RogelbergS. G.StantonJ. M. (2007). Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294693
65.
RooseH.LievensJ.WaegeH. (2007). The joint effect of topic interest and follow-up procedures on the response in a mail questionnaire: An empirical test of the leverage-saliency theory in audience research. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(3), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106290447
66.
RosetteA. S.TostL. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018204
67.
RudmanL. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
68.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
69.
SaxL. J.GilmartinS. K.BryantA. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870
SnyderM.TankeE. D.BerscheidE. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.656
72.
SpitzmüllerC.GlennD. M.BarrC. D.RogelbergS. G.DanielP. (2006). “If you treat me right, I reciprocate”: Examining the role of exchange in organizational survey response. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.363
73.
SpitzmüllerC.GlennD. M.SuttonM. M.BarrC. D.RogelbergS. G. (2007). Survey nonrespondents as bad soldiers: Examining the relationship between organizational citizenship and survey response behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00403.x
74.
TannenbaumS. I.MathieuJ. E.SalasE.CohenD. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.x
75.
ThompsonL. F.SurfaceE. A. (2007). Employee surveys administered online: Attitudes toward the medium, nonresponse, and data representativeness. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428106%2F294696
76.
TierneyL.KadaneJ. B. (1986). Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478240
77.
UnderwoodD.KimH.MatierM. (2000, May21–24). To mail or to web: Comparisons of survey response rates and respondent characteristics (AIR 2000 Annual Forum Paper). AIR. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED446513
78.
Van de BrakeH. J.WalterF.RinkF. A.EssensP. J. M. D.van der VegtG. S. (2018). The dynamic relationship between multiple team membership and individual job performance in knowledge-intensive work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2260
79.
Van de BrakeH. J.WalterF.RinkF. A.EssensP. J. M. D.van der VegtG. S. (2020). Multiple team membership and job performance: The role of employees’ information-sharing networks. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 967–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12326
80.
Van der VegtG. S.Van de VliertE.OosterhofA. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040663
81.
Van KnippenbergD.MellJ. N. (2016). Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.007
82.
Van KnippenbergD.NishiiL. H.DwertmannD. J. G. (2020). Synergy from diversity: Managing team diversity to enhance performance. Behavioral Science & Policy, 6(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2020.0007
83.
WangJ. J.BartlettM.RyanL. (2017). On the impact of nonresponse in logistic regression: Application to the 45 and Up study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0355-z
84.
WeinerS. P.DalessioA. T. (2006). Oversurveying: Causes, consequences, and cures. In KrautA. I. (Ed.), Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 294–311). Jossey-Bass.
85.
WoodR. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0
