When Can Negativity Mean Success? Gender Composition,Negative Relationships and Team Performance

Abstract

Teams are often plagued by internal discord, such as negative relationships, which can impede successful team performance. While most teams eventually encounter negative relationships, we have limited knowledge on how teams manage this negativity. In this article, we expand scholarship on teams by exploring an inherent team characteristic, gender composition, to assess its role in how teams cope with negative relationships. On the one hand, social role theory suggests that teams comprised of more women will perform better in the presence of negative relationships. On the other hand, theories and evidence on personality and individual differences suggest that teams comprised of more men will perform better in the presence of negative relationships. We studied 151 student project teams, and found that teams of mostly women performed better than teams of mostly men, when negative relationships existed among team members. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.

Keywords

gender composition negative relationships team performance social role theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

Antonioni

(1998). Relationship between the Big Five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022814

Barrick

M. R.

Mount

M. K.

(1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

Barrick

M. R.

Parks

Mount

M. K.

(2005). Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationship between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00716.x

Barsade

S. G.

(2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912

Baugh

S. G.

Graen

G. B.

(1997). Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams. Group & Organization Management, 22(3), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1059601197223004

Bear

J. B.

Woolley

A. W.

(2011). The role of gender in team collaboration and performance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801811X13013181961473

Bell

S. T.

(2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595

Bendersky

Shah

N. P.

(2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0316

10.

Bradley

B. H.

Anderson

H. J.

Baur

J. E.

Klotz

A. C.

(2015). When conflict helps: Integrating evidence for beneficial conflict in groups and teams under three perspectives. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(4), 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000033

11.

Bradley

B. H.

Klotz

A. C.

Postlethwaite

B. E.

Brown

K. G.

(2013). Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029845

12.

Bradley

B. H.

Postlethwaite

B. E.

Klotz

A. C.

Hamdani

M. R.

Brown

K. G.

(2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024200

13.

Brahnam

S. D.

Margavio

T. M.

Hignite

M. A.

Barrier

T. B.

Chin

J. M.

(2005). A gender-based categorization for conflict resolution. Journal of Management Development, 24(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510584026

14.

Brass

D. J.

Galaskiewicz

Greve

H. R.

Tsai

(2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159624

15.

Brody

L. R.

Hall

J. A.

(2008). Gender and emotion in context. In Lewis

Haviland-Jones

J. M.

Barrett

L. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 395–408). Guilford Press.

16.

Carnevale

P. J. D.

Isen

A. M.

(1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90041-5

17.

Case

S. S.

(1988). Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women’s language. In Rose

Larwood

(Eds.), Women’s careers: Pathways and pitfalls (pp. 41–63). Praeger.

18.

Chatman

J. A.

O’Reilly

C. A.

(2004). Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159572

19.

Choi

Cho

(2011). Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1106–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.733

20.

Chua

R. Y. J.

Ingram

Morris

M. W.

(2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625956

21.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Erlbaum.

22.

de Jong

Song

L. Z.

(2013). How lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1825–1854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407509

23.

de Jong

B. A.

Dirks

K. T.

Gillespie

(2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110

24.

de Jong

J. P.

Curşeu

P. L.

Leenders

R. T. A. J.

(2014). When do bad apples not spoil the barrel? Negative relationships in teams, team performance, and buffering mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036284

25.

de Klepper

M. C.

Labianca

Sleebos

Agneessens

(2017). Sociometric status and peer control attempts: A multiple status hierarchies approach. Journal of Management Studies, 54(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12242

26.

de Wit

F. R.

Greer

L. L.

Jehn

K. A.

(2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844

27.

Dirks

K. T.

(1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445

28.

Dirks

K. T.

Ferrin

D. L.

(2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640

29.

Driskell

J. E.

Goodwin

G. F.

Salas

O’Shea

P. G.

(2006). What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(4), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249

30.

Duffy

M. K.

Lee

K. Y.

(2012). Negative interpersonal exchanges in teams. In Eby

L. T. d. T.

Allen

T. D.

(Eds.), Personal relationships: The effect on employee attitudes, behavior, and well-being (pp. 195–219). Routledge.

31.

Eagly

A. H.

(2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644

32.

Eagly

A. H.

Johannesen-Schmidt

M. C.

van Engen

M. L.

(2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

33.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

(1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173011

34.

Erez

Isen

A. M.

(2002). The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1055

35.

Everett

M. G.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2014). Networks containing negative ties. Social Networks, 38, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.005

36.

Felps

Mitchell

T. R.

Byington

(2006). How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 175–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27005-9

37.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000163

38.

Furnham

Buchanan

(2005). Personality, gender, and self-perceived intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.011

39.

Goncalo

J. A.

Polman

Maslach

(2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.05.001

40.

Halgin

D. S.

Borgatti

S. P.

Huang

(2020). Prismatic effects of negative ties. Social Networks, 60, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.07.004

41.

Harrigan

Yap

(2017). Avoidance in negative ties: Inhibiting closure, reciprocity, and homophily. Social Networks, 48, 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.07.003

42.

Hills

Argyle

(2001). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00229-4

43.

Homan

A. C.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Humphrey

S. E.

Van Knippenberg

Ilgen

D. R.

Van Kleef

G. A.

(2008). Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732995

44.

Ibarra

(1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451

45.

Jehn

K. A.

(1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638

46.

Jehn

K. A.

Bendersky

(2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25005-x

47.

Joshi

(2014). By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2), 202–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214528331

48.

Joshi

Lazarova

M. B.

Liao

(2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/Orsc.1080.0383

49.

Judge

T. A.

Erez

(2007). Interaction and intersection: The constellation of emotional stability and extraversion in predicting performance. Personnel Psychology, 60, 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00084.x

50.

Karakowsky

Siegel

(1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.620

51.

Kearney

Gebert

(2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013077

52.

Kendall

Tannen

(1997). Gender and language in the workplace. In Ruth

(Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 81–105). Sage.

53.

Korsgaard

M. A.

Soyoung Jeong

Mahony

D. M.

Pitariu

A. H.

(2008). A multilevel view of intragroup conflict. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1222–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308325124

54.

Labianca

Brass

D. J.

(2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318920

55.

Labianca

Brass

D. J.

Gray

(1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/256897

56.

LePine

J. A.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Ilgen

D. R.

Colquitt

J. A.

Ellis

(2002). Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 445–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2986

57.

Lynn

Martin

(1997). Gender differences in extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in 37 nations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(3), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595447

58.

Lyubomirsky

King

Diener

(2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803

59.

Madson

Trafimov

(2001). Gender comparisons in the private, collective, and allocentric selves. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600571

60.

Maertz

C. P.

Griffeth

R. W.

(2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.04.001

61.

Mathieu

J. E.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

van Knippenberg

Ilgen

D. R.

(2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128

62.

McAllister

(1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727

63.

McIntyre

(2010). Gender differences in the nature and linkage of higher-order personality factors to trait and ability emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.019

64.

Merluzzi

(2017). Gender and negative network ties: Exploring difficult work relationships within and across gender. Organization Science, 28(4), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1137

65.

Miller

J. B.

(1991). Women’s and men’s scripts for interpersonal conflict. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00475.x

66.

Morrison

R. L.

(2008). Negative relationships in the workplace: Associations with organizational commitment, cohesion, job satisfaction and intention to turnover. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(4), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200003126

67.

Morrison

R. L.

(2009). Are women tending and befriending in the workplace? Gender differences in the relationship between workplace friendships and organizational outcomes. Sex Roles, 60(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9513-4

68.

Mount

M. K.

Barrick

M. R.

Strauss

J. P.

(1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.272

69.

Neubert

M. J.

(1999). Too much of a good thing or the more the merrier? Exploring the dispersion and gender composition of informal leadership in manufacturing teams. Small Group Research, 30(5), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000507

70.

Porter

C. O. L. H.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Ilgen

D. R.

Ellis

A. P. J.

West

B. J.

Moon

(2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.391

71.

Reilly

R. R.

Lynn

G. S.

Aronson

Z. H.

(2002). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(01)00045-5

72.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Erickson

K. G.

(2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 579–615. https://doi.org/10.1086/318966

73.

Rubineau

Lim

Neblo

(2019). Low status rejection: How status hierarchies influence negative tie formation. Social Networks, 56, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.08.005

74.

Schermuly

C. C.

Meyer

(2016). Good relationships at work: The effects of leader-member exchange and team-member exchange on psychological empowerment, emotional exhaustion, and depression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2060

75.

Schmitt

D. P.

Realo

Voracek

Allik

(2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168

76.

Sherf

E. N.

Venkataramani

(2015). Friend of foe? The impact of relational ties with comparison others on outcome fairness and satisfaction judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.02.002

77.

Tannen

(1993). Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford University Press.

78.

Tannen

(1994). Talking from 9 to 5: Women and men in the workplace: Language, sex and power. Avon Books.

79.

Taylor

S. E.

(1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67

80.

Thiel

C. E.

Harvey

Courtright

Bradley

(2017). What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger: How teams rebound from early-stage relationship conflict. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1623–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317729026

81.

Venkataramani

Dalal

R. S.

(2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.952

82.

Weisberg

Y. J.

DeYoung

C. G.

Hirsh

J. B.

(2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178

83.

Woolley

A. W.

Chabris

C. F.

Pentland

Hashimi

Malone

T. W.

(2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147

84.

Xia

Yuan

Y. C.

Gay

(2009). Exploring negative group dynamics: Adversarial network, personality, and performance in project groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 32–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335416

85.

Yang

S. W.

Trincado

Labianca

Agneessens

(2020). Negative ties at work. In Brass

D. J.

Borgatti

S. P.

(Eds.), Social networks at work. Routledge.

86.

Zaheer

McEvily

Perrone

(1997). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141

87.

Zhang

Peterson

S. J.

(2011). Advice networks in teams: The role of transformational leadership and members’ core self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023254