In this article of the “Interdisciplinary Insights Into Group and Team Dynamics” special issue, we provide guidance for computer scientists and social scientists who seek an interdisciplinary approach to group research. We include how-to guidelines for researchers interested in initiating and maintaining collaborations, and discuss opportunities and pitfalls of interdisciplinary group research. Last, we include a brief case study that portrays some of the complications of creating shared understanding.
CarlettaJ.AshbyS.BourbanS.FlynnM.GuillemotM.HainT.. . . WellnerP. (2006, January-March). Announcing the AMI meeting corpus. The ELRA Newsletter, 11, 3-5. Retrieved from http://groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/ami/corpus/
2.
ChoiB. C. K.PakA. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29, 351-364.
3.
DuRusselL. A.DerryS. J. (2005). Schema (mis)alignment in interdisciplinary teamwork. In DerryS. J.SchunnC. D.GernsbacherM. A. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 187-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
AllenJ.A.FisherC.ChetouaniM.ChiuM. M.GunesH.MehuM.HungH. (2017). Comparing social science and computer science workflow processes for studying group interactions. Small Group Research, 48, 568-590. doi:10.1177/1046496417721747
HuutoniemiK.KleinJ. T.BruunH.HukkinenJ. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39, 79-88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
7.
JanisI. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Kettner-PolleyR. (2016). A brief history of interdisciplinary cooperation in the study of small groups. Small Group Research, 47, 15-133. doi:10.1177/1046496415626514
9.
KleinJ. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
10.
KleinJ. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and integration. In DerryS. J.SchunnC. D.GernsbacherM. A. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 23-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
KleinJ. T. (2006). Afterword: The emergent literature on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research evaluation. Research Evaluation, 15, 75-80.
12.
KleinJ. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MitchamC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15-30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
KleinJ. T. (2013). Communication and collaboration in interdisciplinary research. In O’RourkeM.CrowleyS.EigenbrodeS. D.WulfhorstJ. D. (Eds.), Enhancing communication & collaboration in cross-disciplinary research (pp. 11-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
LedfordH. (2015). Team science. Nature, 525, 308-311.
15.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.HungH.KeytonJ. (2017). New frontiers in analyzing dynamic group interactions: Bridging social and computer science. Small Group Research, 48, 519-531. doi: 10.1177/1046496417721745
16.
MansillaV. B.LamontM.SatoK. (2016). Shared cognitive–emotional–interactional platforms: Markers and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41, 571-612. doi:10.1177/0162243915614103
17.
RylanceR. (2015). Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity. Nature, 525, 313-315.
18.
Van NoordenR. (2015). Interdisciplinarity by the numbers. Nature, 525, 306-307.
19.
WittenbaumG. M.MorelandR. L. (2008). Small-group research in social psychology: Topics and trends over time. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 187-203. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00065.x
