The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) is a measure of group cohesion that has a long history of use in sports psychology and group research. However, researchers often fail to account for the hierarchical nature of group data in their analysis, leading to statistical aggregation biases. This study used multilevel confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the factorial validity of the GEQ at the individual and group levels simultaneously, using a sample of 519 netball players from 56 New Zealand semi-elite and elite teams. Results supported a four-factor model, based on the four subscales of the GEQ, at each level. Factor loadings for the final multilevel model were stronger at the group level, compared with the individual level, suggesting that cohesion is a group-level construct. This study provides evidence for the multilevel factorial validity of the GEQ and suggests that group-level analysis and interpretation should be emphasized in future research.
BassB. M. (1962). The orientation inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
2.
BentlerP. M. (2007). EQS 6.1 for Windows. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
4.
BrawleyL. R.CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 275-294.
5.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
BurkeS. M.CarronA. V.PattersonM. M.EstabrooksP. A.HillJ. L.LougheadT. M.SpinkK. S. (2005). Cohesion as shared beliefs in exercise classes. Small Group Research, 36, 267-288. doi:10.1177/1046496404267942
7.
ByrneB. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CarlessS. A.De PaolaC. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71-88. doi:10.1177/104649640003100104
9.
CarronA. V.BallJ. R. (1978). Cause-effect characteristics of cohesiveness and participation motivation in intercollegiate hockey. International Review of Sport Sociology, 12, 49-60.
10.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31, 89-106. doi:10.1177/104649640003100105
11.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R.EysM. A.BrayS.DorschK.EstabrooksP.PattersonM. M. (2003). Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis. Small Group Research, 34, 468-496. doi:10.1177/1046496403254274
12.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R.WidmeyerW. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In DudaJ. L. (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
13.
CarronA. V.BrayS. R.EysM. A. (2002). Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 119-126. doi:10.1080/026404102317200828
14.
CarronA. V.RamsayM. C. (1994). Internal consistency of the Group Environment Questionnaire modified for university residence settings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 141-142. doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.141
15.
CarronA. V.SpinkK. S. (1995). The group-size cohesion relationship in minimal groups. Small Group Research, 26, 86-105. doi:10.1177/1046496495261005
16.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
17.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1988). Group cohesion and individual adherence to physical activity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 127-138.
18.
DedrickR. F.GreenbaumP. E. (2011). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interageny collaboration of children’s mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 27-40. doi:10.1177/1063426610365879
19.
DionK. L. (2000). Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 7-26. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.7
20.
DyceJ. A.CornellJ. (1996). Factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among musicians. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 263-264. doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9714003
21.
DyerN. G.HangesP. J.HallR. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 149-167. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009
22.
EysM. A.CarronA. V.BrayS. R.BrawleyL. R. (2007). Item wording and internal consistency of a measure of cohesion: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29, 395-402.
23.
GrandR. R.CarronA. V. (1982). Development of a team climate questionnaire. In WankelL. M.WilbergR. B. (Eds.), Psychology of sport and motor behaviour: Research and practice (pp. 217-229). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies.
24.
GullyS. M.DevineD. J.WhitneyD. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497-520. doi:10.1177/1046496495264003
25.
HeckR. H. (2001). Multilevel modeling with SEM. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 89-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
HeuzeJ. P.RaimbaultN.FontayneP. (2006). Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 59-68. doi:10.1080/02640410500127736
27.
HoggM. A.HainsS. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 323-341. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<323::AID-EJSP854>3.0.CO;2-Y
28.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
KennyD. A.LavoieL. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339
30.
LeesonH.FletcherR. B. (2005). Longitudinal stability of the Group Environment Questionnaire with elite female athletes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 147-160. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.147
31.
LiF.HarmerP. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with an intercollegiate sample. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 49-63.
32.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 127-137. doi:10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00252.x
33.
MarshH. W.BallaC. R.McDonaldR. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
34.
MartensR.LandersD. M.LoyJ. W. (1971). Sports cohesiveness questionnaire. Champaign: Department of Physical Education, University of Illinois.
35.
McDonaldR. P.MarshH. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247
36.
MoritzS. E.WatsonC. B. (1998). Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 285-295. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.285
37.
PaskevichD. M.BrawleyL. R.DorschK. D.WidmeyerW. N. (1995). Implications of individual and group level analyses applied to the study of collective efficacy and cohesion. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7, S95.
38.
PaskevichD. M.BrawleyL. R.DorschK. D.WidmeyerW. N. (1999). Relationship between collective efficacy and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 210-222. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.3.210
39.
PattersonM. M.CarronA. V.LougheadT. M. (2005). The influence of team norms on the cohesion–self-reported performance relationship: A multilevel analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 479-493. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.04.004
40.
PrapavessisH.CarronA. V. (1996). The effects of group cohesion on competitive state anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 64-74.
41.
PrapavessisH.CarronA. V. (1997). Cohesion and work output. Small Group Research, 28, 294-301. doi:10.1177/1046496497282006
42.
PrapavessisH.CarronA. V.SpinkK. S. (1996). Team building in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 269-285.
43.
SchutzR. W.EomH. J.SmollF. L.SmithR. E. (1994). Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 226-236. doi:10.1080/02701367.1994.10607623
44.
SenecalJ.LougheadT. M.BloomG. A. (2008). A season-long team-building intervention: Examining the effect of team goal setting on cohesion. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 186-199.
45.
ShapcottK. M.CarronA. V.GreenleesI.HakimY. E. E. (2010). Determinants of team-referent attributions: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 227-244. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2010.9671951
46.
SpinkK. S. (2005). Using a multilevel approach to examine the relationship between task cohesion and team task satisfaction in elite ice hockey players. Small Group Research, 36, 539-554. doi:10.1177/1046496405275229
47.
SpinkK. S.CarronA. V. (1992). Group cohesion and adherence in exercise classes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 78-86.
48.
SpinkK. S.CarronA. V. (1993). The effects of team building on the adherence patterns of female exercise participants. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 39-49.
49.
SpinkK. S.CarronA. V. (1994). Group cohesion effects in exercise classes. Small Group Research, 25, 26-42. doi:10.1177/1046496494251003
50.
SpinkK. S.WilsonK. S.OdnokonP. (2010). Examining the relationship between cohesion and return to team in elite athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 6-11. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.06.002
51.
SullivanP. J.ShortS. E.CramerK. M. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with co-acting sports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 341-347. doi:10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.341
52.
TuckmanB. W.JensenM. A. C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427. doi:10.1177/105960117700200404
53.
WestreK. R.WeissM. R. (1991). The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams. Sport Psychologist, 5, 41-54.
