We provide an empirical examination of peer justice climate, defined as team-level judgments of the fairness with which coworkers generally treat one another, and justice climate, defined as team-level judgments of the fairness with which the team is collectively treated by an authority figure. Based on previous theoretical work, we tested a hierarchical structural model determining that peer justice climate was best represented as three first-order factors, which combine into a single second-order dimension. We found a similar two-level structure for justice climate. We also found that the relationship between peer justice climate and team satisfaction was mediated by cooperative team process.
AkgünA. E.KeskinH.ByrneJ. C. (2010). Procedural justice climate in new product development teams: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 1096-1111. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00773.x
2.
AmbroseM. L.SchminkeM. (2007). Examining justice climate: Issues of fit, simplicity, and content. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues (Vol. 6, pp. 397-412). New York, NY: Elsevier.
3.
AmbroseM. L.SchminkeM. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491-500. doi:10.1037/a0013203
4.
BarskyA.KaplanS. A. (2007). If you feel bad, it’s unfair: A quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 286-295. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286
5.
BarskyA.KaplanS. A.BealD. J. (2011). Just feelings? The role of affect in the formation of organizational fairness judgments. Journal of Management, 37, 248-279. doi:10.1177/0149206310376325
6.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
7.
BlieseP. D.HalversonR. R. (1998). Group consensus and psychological well-being: A large field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 563-580.doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01720.x
8.
ChenF.CurranP. J.BollenK. A.KirbyJ.PaxtonP. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462-494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
9.
ChenX.LamS. K.NaumannS. E.SchaubroeckJ. (2005). Group citizenship behavior: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of its antecedents and consequences. Management and Organization Review, 1, 273-300. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00012.x
10.
ChoJ.DansereauF. (2010). Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 409-421. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.006
11.
ChoiJ. (2008). Event justice perceptions and employees’ reactions: Perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 513-528. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513
12.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
13.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
14.
ColquittJ. A. (2007). Justice in teams. In RogelbergS. G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 432-434). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. H.NgK. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
16.
ColquittJ. A.NoeR. A.JacksonC. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x
17.
ColquittJ. A.Zapata-PhelanC. P.RobersonQ. M. (2005). Justice in teams: A review of fairness effects in collective contexts. In MartocchioJ. J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 24, pp. 53-94). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
18.
CompeauD.MarcolinB. L.KelleyH.HigginsC. A. (2012). Research commentary—Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Research, 23, 1093-1109. doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0411
19.
CropanzanoR.AmbroseM. L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Eds.), Advances in organization justice (pp. 119-151). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
CropanzanoR.LiA.BensonL. (2011). Peer justice and teamwork process. Group & Organization Management, 36, 567-596. doi:10.1177/1059601111414561
21.
CropanzanoR.LiA.JamesK. (2007). Intraunit justice and interunit justice and the people who experience them. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (Vol. 6, pp. 415-437). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
22.
CropanzanoR.SteinJ. H.NadisicT. (2011). Social justice and the experience of human emotion. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
23.
DayanM.Di BenedettoC. A.ColakM. (2009). Managerial trust in new product development projects: Its antecedents and consequences. R&D Management, 39, 21-37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00538.x
24.
De CremerD. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1335-1341. doi:10.1023/A:1021267007531
25.
DeeryS. J.IversonR. D. (2005). Labor-management cooperation: Antecedents and impact on organizational performance. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 58, 588-609.
26.
EhrhartM. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61-94. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x
27.
ErdoganB.BauerT. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1104-1120. doi:10.1037/a0020578
28.
FassinaN. E.JonesD. A.UggerslevK. L. (2008). Relationship clean-up time: Using meta-analysis and path analysis to clarify relationships among job satisfaction, perceived fairness, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 161-188. doi:10.1002/job.494
29.
GriffinB. (2010). Multilevel relationships between organizational-level incivility, justice and intention to stay. Work & Stress, 24, 309-323. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.531186
30.
GuzzoR. A.SheaG. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31.
HakonenM.LipponenJ. (2008). Procedural justice and identification with virtual teams: The moderating role of face-to-face meetings and geographical dispersion. Social Justice Research, 21, 164-178. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0070-3
32.
HammerT.BayazitM.WazeterD. L. (2009). Union leadership and member attitudes: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 392-410. doi:10.1037/a0013613
33.
HoeglM.GemuendenH. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12, 435-449. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
34.
HofmannD. A.JonesL. M. (2005). Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 509-522. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.509
35.
HowesJ. C.CropanzanoR.GrandeyA. A.MohlerC. (2000). Who is supporting whom?: Quality team effectiveness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Quality Management, 5, 207-223. doi:10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00021-9
36.
HsiungH. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 349-361. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1043-2
37.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM.JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
38.
JamesL. R.McIntyreM. D. (1996). Perceptions of organizational climate. In MurphyK. (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 416-450). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
JohnsonJ. P.KorsgaardM.SapienzaH. J. (2002). Perceived fairness, decision control, and commitment in international joint venture management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1141-1160. doi:10.1002/smj.277
40.
JonesD. A.MartensM. L. (2009). The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1025-1051. doi:10.1002/job.577
41.
KimK. H. (2005). The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 368-390. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_2
42.
KimW. C.MauborgneR. (1993). Effectively conceiving and executing multinational’s worldwide strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 419-448. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<323::AID-SMJ976>3.0.CO;2-F
43.
KonovskyM. A.FreemanA. B. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 489-511. doi:10.1177/014920630002600306
44.
KozlowskiS. J.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
45.
KroonB. B.van de VoordeK. K.van VeldhovenM. M. (2009). Cross-level effects of high-performance work practices on burnout: Two counteracting mediating mechanisms compared. Personnel Review, 38, 509-525. doi:10.1108/00483480910978027
46.
KuenziM.SchminkeM. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35, 634-717. doi:10.1177/0149206308330559
47.
LavelleJ. J.McMahanG. C.HarrisC. M. (2009). Fairness in human resource management, social exchange relationships, and citizenship behavior: Testing linkages of the target similarity model among nurses in the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 2419-2434. doi:10.1080/09585190903363748
48.
LavelleJ. J.RuppD. E.BrocknerJ. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33, 841-866. doi:10.1177/0149206307307635
49.
LePineJ. A.PiccoloR. F.JacksonC. L.MathieuJ. E.SaulJ. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273-307. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
50.
LesterS. W.MeglinoB. M.KorsgaardM. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368. doi:10.2307/3069351
51.
LeventhalG. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In BerkowitzL.WalsterW. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York, NY: Academic Press.
52.
LiA.CropanzanoR. (2009a). Do East Asians respond more/less strongly to organizational justice than North Americans? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 787-805. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00825.x
53.
LiA.CropanzanoR. (2009b). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35, 564-599. doi:10.1177/0149206308330557
54.
LiN.LiangJ.CrantJ. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 395-404. doi:10.1037/a0018079
55.
LiaoH.RuppD. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242-256. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242
56.
LinS.TangT.LiC.WuC.LinH. (2007). Mediating effect of cooperative norm in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors from procedural justice climate. Psychological Reports, 101, 67-78. doi:10.2466/PR0.101.5.67-78
57.
LindE. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Press.
58.
LindE. A.KrayL.ThompsonL. (1998). The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and others’ unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 1-22. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2785
59.
LipponenJ.WisseB. (2010). Shared perceptions of perceived justice as a predictor of externally rated departmental level academic performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 1065-1074. doi:10.1348/096317909X479727
60.
LuoY. (2008). Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 27-46. doi:10.1002/smj.646
61.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376. doi:10.1348/096317901167523
62.
MastersonS. S. (2001). A trickle-down model of organizational justice: Relating employees’ and customers’ perceptions of and reactions to fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 594-604. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594
63.
MayerD. M.KuenziM. (2010). Exploring the “black box” of justice climate: What mechanisms link justice climate and outcomes? In MullenE.MannixE.NealeM. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Fairness (Vol. 13, pp. 331-346). London, England: Elsevier Science Press.
64.
McGonigleT. P.HauensteinN. M. A. (2000, April). An investigation of the dimensionality of organizational justice. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Society of Industrial /Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
65.
MichalisinM. D.KarauS. J.TangpongC. (2004). The effects of performance and team cohesion on attribution: A longitudinal simulation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1108-1115. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00042-0
66.
MolinerC.Martínez-TurV.PeiróJ. M.RamosJ.CropanzanoR. (2005). Relationships between organizational justice and burnout at the work-unit level. International Journal of Stress Management, 12, 99-116. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.12.2.99
67.
MossholderK. W.BennettN.MartinC. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199803)19:2<131::AID-JOB878>3.0.CO;2-P
68.
NaumannS. E.BennettN. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881-889. doi:10.2307/1556416
69.
NaumannS. E.BennettN. (2002). The effects of procedural justice climate on work group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 361-377. doi:10.1177/10496402033003004
70.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
71.
RuppD. E.BashshurM. R.LiaoH. (2007). Justice climate past, present, and future: Models of structure and emergence. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues (Vol. 6, pp. 357-396). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
72.
RuppD. E.CropanzanoR. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925-9246. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5
73.
RuppD. E.McCanceA.SpencerS.SonntagK. (2008). Customer (in)justice and emotional labor: The role of perspective taking, anger, and emotional regulation?Journal of Management, 34, 903-924. doi:10.1177/0149206307309261
74.
ScheinE. H. (2004). Learning when and how to lie: A neglected aspect of organizational and occupational socialization. Human Relations, 57, 260-273. doi:10.1177/0018726704043270
75.
SimonsT. L.RobersonQ. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 432-443. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.432
76.
SkarlickiD. P.EllardJ. H.KellnB. R. C. (1998). Third-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 119-127. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.119
77.
SkarlickiD. P.KulikC. (2005). Third party reactions to employee mistreatment: A justice perspective. In StawB.KramerR. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 183-230). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
78.
SpellC. S.ArnoldT. J. (2007). A multi-level analysis of organizational justice climate, structure, and employee mental health. Journal of Management, 33, 724-751. doi:10.1177/0149206307305560
79.
TangiralaS.RamanujamR. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61, 37-68. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.x
80.
ThatcherS. B.BaggerJ. (2011). Working in pajamas: Telecommuting, unfairness sources, and unfairness perceptions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 248-276. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00082.x
81.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
82.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
83.
Van den BosK.LindE. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
84.
WallaceJ.EdwardsB. D.MondoreS. P.FinchD. M. (2008). Employee discrimination claims and employee-initiated lawsuits: Does procedural justice climate moderate the claims → disputes relationship?Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 313-326.
85.
WalumbwaF. O.HartnellC. A.OkeA. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517-529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
86.
WalumbwaF. O.WuC.OrwaB. (2008). Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 251-265. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.004
87.
WhitmanD. S.CaleoS.CarpenterN. C.HornerM. T.BernerthJ. B. (2012). Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 776-791. doi:10.1037/a0028021
