Past research examining group cohesion and performance was reviewed using meta analysis. The results indicated a positive relationship with the average cohesive group performing 18 percentile points above the average noncohesive group. Given the nature of the studies used here (all studies had been previously published), caution is suggested in generalizing these results to “real” work groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalesR. F.CohenS. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
2.
CartwrightD.ZanderA. (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper & Row.
3.
ErezM.KanferF. H. (1983). The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance. Academy of Management Review, 8, 454-463.
4.
GlassG. V.McGawB.SmithM. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. London: Sage.
5.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L.JacksonG. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
KellyL.DuranR. L. (1985). Interactions and performance in small groups: A descriptive report. International Journal ofSmall Group Research, 1, 182-192.
7.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (1979). Goal setting—A motivational technique that works. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 68-80.
8.
LockeE. A. (1978). The ubiquity of the technique of goal setting in theories of and approaches to employee motivation. Academy of Management Review, 3, 594-601.
9.
MartensR.LandersD.LoyJ. (1972). Sports Cohesiveness Questionnaire. Unpublished inventory. (Available from R. Martens, Department of Physical Education, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801).
10.
MartensR.PetersonJ. A. (1971). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance. International Review of Sport Sociology, 6, 50-59.
11.
PolleyR. B. (1985). A general theory of polarization and unification. International Journal of Small Group Research, 1, 150-161.
12.
PolleyR. B.JessupL. M. (1988, August). Beyond cohesiveness: Assessing group effectiveness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, Anaheim, CA.
13.
RosenthalR. (1984). Meta-analysis procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
StogdillR. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26-43.
15.
ZaccaroS. J.LoweC. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
