Although it is often assumed that an individual’s self-view as a leader has an impact on that individual’s emergence as a leader, there is currently no empirical evidence of this effect in the literature. Longitudinal social network analysis is used to study both the impact of an individual’s self-view as a leader on leadership emergence and how the process of leadership emergence influences an individual’s self-view as a leader over time. Results suggest a reciprocal process: An individual’s self-view as a leader influences the number of leadership nominations an individual receives over time and the number of leadership nominations received over time influences an individual’s self-view as a leader.
Amaral, M., & Monteiro, M. ( 2002). To be without being seen: Computer-mediated communication and social identity management. Small Group Research, 33, 575-589. doi:10.1177/104649602237171
2.
Amit, K., Popper, M., Gal, R., Mamane-Levy, T., & Lisak, A. ( 2009). Leadership-shaping experiences: A comparative study of leaders and non-leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30, 302-318. doi:10.1108/ 01437730910961658
3.
Ashford, S.J., Blatt, R., & VandeWell, D. ( 2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773-799. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5
4.
Back, M.D., Schmukle, S.C., & Egloff, B. ( 2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533-548. doi:10.1037/a0016229
5.
Balkundi, P., Barsness, Z., & Michael, J. ( 2009). Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability. Small Group Research, 40, 301-322. doi:10.1177/1046496409333404
6.
Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. ( 2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership . Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941-961. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.004
7.
Byrne, B.M. ( 1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept (pp. 287-316). New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
Calder, B.J. ( 1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179-204). Chicago, IL: St. Clair.
9.
Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E., & Marrone, J.A. ( 2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal , 50, 1217-1234. doi:10.2307/20159921
10.
Cooley, C.H. ( 1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribners.
11.
Durham, C.C., Knight, D., & Locke, E.A. ( 1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231. doi:10.1006/obhd. 1997.2739
12.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B.J., & Shamir, B. ( 2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744. doi:10.2307/3069307
13.
Gamble, W.C., & Yu, J.J. ( 2008). Adolescent siblings’ looking glass self-orientations: Patterns of liabilities and associations with parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 860-874. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9276-9
14.
Goffman, E. ( 1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
15.
Gronn, P. ( 2002). Distributed leadership as unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
16.
Grubb, E.L., & Grathwohl, H.L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31, 22-27. doi:10.2307/1249461
17.
Hogg, M.A. ( 2001a). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
18.
Hogg, M.A. ( 2001b). From prototypicality to power: A social identity analysis of leadership. In S. R. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 1-30). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
19.
Hogg, M.A. ( 2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
Hogg, M., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. ( 2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35. doi:10.1177/1046496404263424
21.
Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. ( 2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140. doi:10.2307/259266
22.
Hogue, M., & Lord, R.G. ( 2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 370-390. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.006
23.
Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. ( 1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2, 107-124.
Huang, M. ( 2009). A conceptual framework of the effects of positive affective relationships on group knowledge networks. Small Group Research , 40, 323-346. doi:10.1177/1046496409332441
26.
Ibarra, H. ( 1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly , 44, 764-791. doi:10.2307/ 2667055
27.
Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. ( 2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontier of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16, 359-371. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0129
28.
James, W. ( 1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
29.
Jackson, J. ( 2008). Reactions to social dilemmas as a function of group identity, rational calculations, and social context. Small Group Research , 39, 673-705. doi:10.1177/1046496408322761
30.
Judge, T.A., Colin, A.E., & Ilies, R. ( 2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology , 89, 542-552. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.542
31.
Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J.P. ( 1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.620
32.
Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 307-332. doi:10.1177/1046496404264941
33.
Kellett, J.B., Humphrey, R.H., & Sleeth, R.G. ( 2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership . Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523-544. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00142-X
34.
Kellett, J.B., Humphrey, R.H., & Sleeth, R.G. ( 2006). Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders . Leadership Quarterly, 17, 146-162. doi:10.1016/j. leaqua.2005.12.003
35.
Kolb, J. ( 1999). The effect of gender role, attitude toward leadership, and self-confidence on leader emergence: Implications for leadership development . Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 305-320. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920100403
36.
Lord, R.G., & Brown, D.J. ( 2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Lord, R.G., Brown, D.J., & Freiberg, S.J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167-203. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2832
38.
Lord, R.G., de Vader, C.L., & Alliger, G.M. ( 1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures . Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.402
39.
Lord, R.G., & Hall, R.J. ( 2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 591-615.
40.
Lospinoso, J.A., Schweinberger, M., Snijders, T.A.B., & Ripley, R.M. ( 2010). Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models. Unpublished manuscript.
41.
Marsh, H.W. ( 1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review , 2, 77-171. doi:10.1007/ BF01322177
42.
Marsh, H.W. ( 1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research . In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
43.
Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M., & Yeung, A.S. ( 1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 154-157. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2
44.
Marsh, H.W., Chanal, J.P., Sarrazin, P.G., & Bois, J.E. ( 2005). Self-belief does make a difference: A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of physical self-concept and gymnastics performance . Journal of Sport Sciences, 27, 53-70.
45.
Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. ( 1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
46.
Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. ( 2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
47.
Marsh, H.W., Papaioannou, A., & Theodorakis, Y. (2006). Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: Reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology, 25, 316-328. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.316
48.
Marsh, H.W., & Perry, C. ( 2005). Does a positive self-concept contribute to winning gold medals in elite swimming? The causal ordering of elite athlete self-concept and championship performances. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27, 71-91.
49.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. ( 1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist , 41, 954-969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
50.
Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D.R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT. Emotion, 3, 97-105. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.97
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.J. ( 2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for the workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly , 46, 121-146. doi:10.2307/2667127
53.
Mehra, A., Smith, B.R., Dixon, A.L., & Robertson, B. ( 2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232-245. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003
54.
Meindl, J. ( 1993). Reinventing leadership: A radical, social psychological approach. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations (pp. 89-118). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
Midkiff, R.M., Burke, J.P., Hunt, J.P., & Ellison, G.C. ( 1986). The role of self-concept of academic attainment in achievement-related behaviors. Psychological Reports, 58, 151-159.
56.
Neubert, M.J., & Taggar, S. ( 2004). Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. Leadership Quarterly , 15, 175-194. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.006
57.
Nicholls, J. ( 1979). Development of perception of attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94-99. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.94
58.
Ripley, R.M., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2010). Manual for SIENA Version 4.0. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics.
59.
Rosenberg, M. ( 1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY : Basic Books.
60.
Sanders, K., & Nauta, A. ( 2004). Social cohesiveness and absenteeism: The relationship between characteristics of employees and short-term absenteeism within an organization. Small Group Research, 35, 724-741. doi:10.1177/1046496404267186
61.
Schyns, B., & Sczesny, S. ( 2010). Leadership attributes valence in self-concept and occupational self-efficacy. Career Development International, 15, 78-92. doi:10.1108/13620431011020907
62.
Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. ( 2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509-538. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x
63.
Shaffer, D.R. ( 2008). Social and personality development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
64.
Shamir, B., House, R.J., & Arthur, M.B. ( 1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 557-594. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
65.
Snijders, T.A.B. ( 2009). Longitudinal methods of network analysis. In B. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and system science (pp. 5998-6013). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
66.
Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., & van de Bunt, G.G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60. doi:10.1016/ j.socnet.2009.02.004
67.
Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. van Montfort , H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68.
Sparrowe, R.T. ( 2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 419-439. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.004
69.
Snyder, M. ( 1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. doi:10.1037/h0037039
70.
Steglich, C.E.G., Snijders, T.A.B., & Pearson, M. ( 2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x/pdf)
71.
Taggar, S., Hackett, R., & Saha, S. ( 1999). Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52, 899-926. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00184.x
72.
Valacich, J.S., Jung, J.H., & Looney, C.A. ( 2006). The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 1-15. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.1.1
73.
Van den bergh, B.R.H. ( 2006). Influences of distal and proximal family environment variables on the pre-adolescents’ self-concept. In A. P. Prescott (Ed.), The concept of self in education, family and sports (pp. 153-177). New York, NY: Nova Science.
74.
Van der Mescht, H. ( 2004). Phenomenology in education: A case study in educational leadership. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 4, 1-16.
75.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M.A. ( 2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243-295. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1
76.
Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M.A. ( 2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002
77.
Wheelan, S.A., & Johnston, F. ( 1996). The role of informal member leaders in a system containing formal leaders. Small Group Research, 27, 33-55. doi:10.1177/1046496496271002
78.
Wiley, S., Perkins, K., & Deaux, K. ( 2008). Through the looking glass: Ethnic and generational patterns of immigrant identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 385-398. doi:10.1177/1046496496271002
79.
Wolff, S.B., Pescosolido, A.T., & Druskat, V.U. ( 2002). Emotional intelligence as the basis for leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 505-522. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00141-8
80.
Yeung, K.T., & Martin, J.L. ( 2003). The looking glass self: An empirical test and elaboration . Social Forces, 81, 843-879. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0048
81.
Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.308
