This study investigated the influence of production team size (small vs. large) and employees’ perceptions of their production work teams (negative, neutral, and positive) on their level of workplace commitment.Twenty-three production work teams composed of 205 employees (105 males, 100 females), drawn from two team-based private manufacturing organizations, participated in the study. They responded to the workgroup functioning scale and Buchanan’s organizational commitment scale. Team size had no significant correlation with how employees perceived their production work team and their levels of workplace commitment. The results of the 2 × 3 analysis of variance indicated that production team size had no significant influence on workplace commitment. However, employees who had positive perceptions of their production work teams were significantly more committed to the workplace than were those who held either neutral or negative perceptions.
Bayazit, M., & Mannix, E.A. ( 2003). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting team members’ intent to remain in the team. Small Group Research, 34, 290-321.
2.
Belanger, J., Edwards, P.K., & Wright, M. ( 2003). Commitment at work and independence from management: A study of advanced team-working. Work and Occupations, 30, 234-252.
3.
Brewer, M., Hong, Y., & Li, O. ( 2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In L. Judd, V. Yzerbyt, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 25-38). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
4.
Brown, M.E., & Trevino, L.K. ( 2006) Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 954-962.
5.
Buchanan, B. ( 1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organization. Administrative Science Quarterly , 19, 533-546.
6.
Campbell, D.T. ( 1958). Common fates, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science , 3, 14-24.
7.
Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J., & Higgs, A.C. ( 1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective workgroups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
8.
Carron, A.V., Brawley, L.R., Eys, M.A., Bray, S., Dorsch, K., Estabrooks, P., Terry, P.C. ( 2003). Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? Small Group Research, 34, 468-496.
9.
Cook, J., & Wall, T.D. ( 1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
10.
Costa, C.C. ( 2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32, 605-623.
11.
De Dreu, C.K.W. ( 2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83-107.
12.
DeChurch L.A., & Marks, M.A. ( 2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311-329.
13.
DeNisi, A.S., Hitt, M.A., & Jackson, S.E. ( 2003). The knowledge-based approach to sustainable competitive advantage. In S. E. Jackson, M. A. Hitt, & A. S. DeNisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (pp. 3-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Devine, D.J. ( 2002). A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 291-310.
15.
Dion, K.L. ( 2000). Group cohesion: From "field of forces" to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice , 4, 7-26.
16.
Edwards, B.D., Day, E.A., Arthur, Jr., W., & Bell, S.T. ( 2006). Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology , 91, 727-726.
17.
Elloy, D.F. ( 2005). The influence of superleader behaviors on organizational commitment, job satisfaction and organization self-esteem in a self-managed workteam. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal , 26, 120-127.
18.
Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M.G., & Orina, M.M. ( 2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
19.
Gevers, J.M.P., Rutte, G.O., & van Eerde, W. ( 2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 52-72.
20.
Glassop, L. ( 2002). The organizational benefits of teams. Human Relations, 55, 225-249.
21.
Greenberg, E.S., Sikora, P.B., Grunberg, L., & Moore, S. ( 2006). Work teams and organizational commitment: Exploring the influence of the team experience on employee attitudes (Workplace Change Project Working Paper, WP-012). Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/PEC/workplacechange/papers/WP_012.pdf
22.
Hackman, J.R. ( 2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances . Boston: HBS Press.
23.
Hamilton, B.H., Nickerson, J.A., & Owan, H. ( 2003). Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. Journal of Political Economy, 117, 465-497.
24.
Hirschfeld, R.R., Jordan, M.H., Feild, H.S., Giles, W.F., & Armenakis, A.A. (2006). Becoming team players: Team members’ mastery of teamwork, knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 467-474.
25.
Huckman, R.S., Staats, B.R., & Upton, D.M. ( 2009). Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian Software Services. Management Sciences, 55, 85-100.
26.
Ip, W.G., Chiu, C., & Wan, C. ( 2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait-versus goal-based group perception . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 368-381.
27.
Jackson, C.L., Colquitt, J.A., Wesson, M.J., & Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884-899.
28.
Jex, S.M. ( 2002). Organizational psychology: A scientist-practitioner approach . New York: Wiley.
29.
Jex, S.M., & Thomas, J.L. ( 2003). Relations between stressors and group perceptions: Main and mediating effects. Work & Stress, 17, 158-169.
30.
Kashima, Y., Kashima, E., Chiu, C., Farsides, T., Gelfand, M., & Hong, Y., Yzerbyt, V. ( 2005). Culture, essentialism, and agency: Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups?European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 147-169.
31.
Kerr, N.L., & Tindale, R.S. ( 2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 623-655.
32.
Kirkman, B.L., & Rosen, B. ( 2000). Powering up teams. Organizational Dynamics , 28, 48-65.
33.
Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (2000). Bewitched, bothered, and bewildered: The meaning and experience of teamworking for employees in an automobile company. Human Relations, 53, 1481-1517.
34.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Bell, B.S. ( 2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. T. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 12, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
35.
Laughlin, P.R., Hatch, E.C., Silver, J.S., & Boh, L. ( 2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644-651.
36.
Leach, D.J., Wall, T.D., Rogelberg, S.G., & Jackson, P.R. ( 2005): Team autonomy performance, and member job strain: Uncovering the teamwork KSA link. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 1-24.
37.
Lester, S.W., Meglino, B.M., & Korsgaard, M.A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed workgroups . Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
38.
Lim, B.C., & Klein, K.J. ( 2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental models similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403-418.
39.
Lok, P., Westwood, R., & Crawford, J. ( 2005). Perceptions of organizational subculture and their significance for organizational commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 490-514.
40.
Marimuthu, M., & Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Can demographic diversity in top management team contribute for greater financial performance? An empirical discussion. The journal of International Social Research, 2, 274-286.
41.
Mason, C.M., & Griffin, M.A. ( 2003). Identifying group task satisfaction at work. Small Group Research, 34, 413-422.
42.
Mathieu, J.E., Gilson, L.L., & Ruddy, T.M. ( 2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 97-108.
43.
Mayer, D., Nishii, L., Schneider, B., & Goldstein, H. ( 2007). The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. Personnel Psychology, 60, 929-963.
44.
Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Sablynski, C.J., & Erez, M. ( 2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102-1123.
45.
Mohrman, S.A. ( 2003). Designing work for knowledge based competition. In S E. Jackson, M. A. Hitt, & A. S. DeNisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (pp. 94-123). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
46.
Mueller, J.S. ( 2006, August). Why individuals in larger teams perform worse . Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, GA.
47.
Nadler, A., & Halabi, S. ( 2006): Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability, identification, and type of help on receptivity to high-status group’s help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 97-110.
48.
Parris, M.A. ( 2003). Work team: Perceptions of a ready-made support system ? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 71-83.
49.
Price, P.C., Smith, A.R., & Lench, H.C. ( 2006). The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: The more, the riskier. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 382-398.
50.
Pruljt, H. ( 2003). Teams between neo-Taylorism and anti-Taylorism. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24, 77-101.
51.
Rico, R., Molleman, E., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., & Van der Vegt, G.S. (2007). The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration . Journal of Management, 33, 111-132.
52.
Roberson, Q.M., & Stevens, C.K. ( 2006). Making sense of diversity in the workplace: Organizational justice and language abstraction in employees’ accounts of diversity-related incidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 379-391.
53.
Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2006). Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 944-960.
54.
Schippers, M.C., Den Hartog, D.N., & Koopman, P.L. ( 2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 189-211.
55.
Schippers, M.C., Den Hartog, D.N., Koopman, P.L., & Wienk, J.A. ( 2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779-802.
56.
Schneider, B., Smith, D.B., & Sipe, W.P. ( 2000). Personnel selection and psychology. Multilevel considerations . In K. J. Klein & S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations. Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 91-156). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
57.
Seashore, S.E., Lawler, E.E., Mirvis, P., & Cammann, C. ( 1982). Observing and measuring organizational change: A guide to field practice. New York: Wiley .
58.
Somech, A. ( 2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous team. Journal of Management, 32, 132-157.
59.
Sommers, S.R. ( 2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612.
60.
Spreitzer, G.M., & Mishra, A.K. ( 2002). To stay or go: Voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 23, 707-729.
61.
Stahl, G.K., Maznevski, M.L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. ( 2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural workgroups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 690-709.
62.
Stewart, G.L. ( 2003). Toward an understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 183-204). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63.
Stewart, G.L. ( 2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management , 32, 29-54.
64.
Stewart, G.L., Manz, C.C., & Sims, H.P. ( 2000). Teamwork and group dynamics. New York : Wiley.
65.
Walumbwa, F.O., Lawler, J.J., & Avolio, B.J. ( 2007). Leadership, individual differences, and work-related attitudes: A cross culture investigation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 212-230.
66.
West, M.A. ( 2000) Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1-29). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
67.
Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, D., Seron, E., & Demoulin, S. ( 2004). Subjective essentialism in action: Self-anchoring and social control as consequences of fundamental social divides. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd , & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 101-124). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
