This study examines the relationship between the equity sensitivity orientation of individuals and their exhibition of organizational citizenship behaviors in a team setting. Equity sensitivity theory posits that individuals differ in their equity orientation. Individuals on the benevolent end of the scale do not mind if they are giving more than they are receiving. Conversely, individuals at the entitled end of the spectrum prefer to be in a situation where they are receiving more than they are giving. Participants were administered the Equity Sensitivity instrument (ESI) at the beginning of a team project to determine their equity orientation. At the conclusion of the team project, participants were asked to evaluate their teammates' citizenship behaviors. Through a regression analysis, a significantly positive relationship was found between equity sensitivity scores and team citizenship behaviors. Those participants holding a more benevolent orientation were significantly more likely to exhibit citizenship behaviors as reported by their teammates.
Adams, J.S. (1963a). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2.
Adams, J.S. (1963b). Wage inequities, productivity and work quality . Industrial Relations, 3, 9-16.
3.
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 267-299). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
Akan, O.H. (2005). The role of concrescent conversation in the performing stage of work groups. Team Performance Management Journal , 11, 51-62.
5.
Allen, R.S., & White, C.S. (2002). Equity sensitivity theory: A test of responses to two types of under-reward situations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14, 435-451.
6.
Becker, W.S. (2007). Field of dreams: Team implementations and greenfields . Team Performance Management, 13(3/4), 65-89.
7.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
8.
Bentler, P.M. (1992). On the fit of models to co-variances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
9.
Blakely, G.L., Andrews, M.C., & Moorman, R.H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 259-273.
10.
Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
11.
Druskat, V.U., & Wheeler, J.V. (2004). How to lead a self-managing team. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 65-71.
12.
Fok, L.Y., Hartman, S.J., Patti, A.L., & Razek, J.R. (2000a). Human factors affecting the acceptance of total quality management. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17, 714-729.
13.
Fok, L.Y., Hartman, S.J., Patti, A.L., & Razek, J.R. (2000b). The relationships between equity sensitivity, growth need strength, organizational citizenship behavior, and perceived outcomes in the quality environment: A study of accounting professionals. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 99-120.
14.
Foote, D.A., & Harmon, S. (2006). Measuring equity sensitivity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(1/2), 90-108.
15.
Graham, J.W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior . Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249-270.
16.
Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Ed.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 337-351). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories . Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
18.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
19.
Hursthouse, P., & Kolb, D. (2001). Cultivating culture in greenfields: The Heinz Watties's case. Personnel Review, 30, 317-330.
20.
Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D., & Miles, E.W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055-1064.
21.
Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D., & Miles, E.W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234.
22.
Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston : Houghton-Mifflin.
23.
Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
24.
Kickul, J., & Lester, S.W. (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior . Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 191-217.
25.
King, W.C., & Miles, E.W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 133-142.
26.
King, W.C., Miles. E.W., & Day, D.D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317.
27.
Konovsky, M.A., & Organ, D.W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253-266.
28.
Miles, E.W., Hatfield. J. D., & Huseman, R.C. (1989). The equity sensitivity construct: Potential implications for worker performance. Journal of Management, 15, 581-588.
29.
Miles, E.W., Hatfield, J.D., & Huseman, R.C. (1994). Equity sensitivity and outcome importance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 585-596.
30.
Mowday, R.T. (1991). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations . In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (5th ed., pp. 111-131). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
32.
Organ, D.W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
33.
O'Toole, J., & Lawler, E.E. (2006). The new American workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Patrick, S.L., & Jackson, J.J. (1991). Further examination of the equity sensitivity construct. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 1091-1106.
35.
Patti, A.L., Fok, L.Y., & Hartman, S.J. (2004). Differences between managers and line employees in a quality management environment. The International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 21, 214-230.
36.
Podsakoff, P.M., Ahearn, M., & MacKenzie, S.B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262-268.
37.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.
38.
Sauley, K.S., & Bedeian, A.G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26, 885-910.
39.
Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W., & Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655-663.
40.
Van Scotter, J.R., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.
41.
Varga, A., Rudas, T., Delaney, H.D., & Maxwell, S.E. (1996). Dichotomization, partial correlation, and conditional independence. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics , 21, 264-282.
42.
Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors . Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
