A new conceptual framework of collective orientation in team contexts has recently been proposed in terms of vertical and horizontal dimensions of idiocentrism and allocentrism. A two-phase longitudinal study of 270 university students engaged in 86 academic groups partly confirmed the conceptualization by identifying four interpretable factors: vertical and horizontal idiocentrism, horizontal allocentrism, and avoiding arguments. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and a structural model of relationships between the four dimensions in both phases of the study are reported in this article.
Alavi, S.B., & McCormick, J. (2004). Theoretical and measurement issues for studies of collective orientation in team contexts. Small Group Research , 35, 111-127.
2.
Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103, 411-423.
3.
Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277-288.
4.
Earley, P.C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319-348.
5.
Eby, L.T., & Dobbins, G.H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual- and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 18, 275-295.
6.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-50.
7.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
8.
Gudykunst, W.B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures . Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
11.
Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D., du Toit, S., & du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
12.
Kenny, D.A., Mannetty, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D.A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
13.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
14.
Miles, J.A. (2000). Relationships of collective orientation and cohesion to team outcomes. Psychological Reports, 86, 435-444.
15.
Oetzel, J.G. (2001). Self-construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Small Group Research, 32, 19-54.
16.
Stout, R.J., Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1997). Collective orientation and team performance. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1190-1194.
17.
Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
19.
Wagner, J.A., III. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal,38, 152-172.
20.
Watson, W.E., Johnson, L., & Merritt, D. (1998). Team orientation, self-orientation, and diversity in task groups: Their connection to team performance over time. Group & Organization Management, 23, 161-189.
21.
Workman, M. (2001). Collectivism, individualism, and cohesion in a team-based occupation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 82-97.
