Decision-making groups tend to favor the introduction and use of shared over unshared information, often leading teams to make suboptimal decisions. This study examined the influence of time (restricted vs. ample) and perceptions of task demonstrability (solve vs. judge) on information sampling and decision quality in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Three-person face-to-face and computer-mediated groups were asked to read about a fictional murder investigation and to determine which of the three suspects was the guilty individual. The results indicated that the computer-mediated groups, who were given a solve set of instructions and ample time to discuss the task, had the highest solution rates. Analyses of the computer-mediated discussion logs indicated that the solve groups who were given extended time repeated and recalled more unshared information.
Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., & Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision-making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
2.
Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27, 532-550.
3.
Durso, F. T., Hackworth, C. A., Barile, A. L., Dougherty, M. R., & Ohrt, D. D. (1998). Source monitoring in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. Cognitive Technology, 3, 32-38.
4.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
5.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997). The impact of information on small group choice. Journal of 0Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 132-140.
6.
Graetz, K. A., Boyle, E. S., Kimble, C. E., Thompson, P., & Garloch, J. L. (1998). Information sharing in face-to-face, teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29, 714-743.
7.
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turhoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
8.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1996a). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
9.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1996b). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 181-193.
10.
Joinson, A. N. (1998). Causes and effects of disinhibition on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), The psychology of the internet (pp. 43-60). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Kelly, J., & McGrath, J. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction in four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-406.
12.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
13.
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
14.
Kruglanski, A. W., Friedman, I., & Zeevi, G. (1971). The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance. Journal of Personality, 39, 606-617.
15.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.”Psychological Review, 103, 263-283
16.
Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
17.
Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). The discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
18.
Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
19.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
20.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 415-469). Boston: McGraw Hill.
21.
McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
22.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
23.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
24.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-197.
25.
Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
26.
Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
28.
Stasser, G., Stewart, D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
29.
Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussion of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
30.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
31.
Stasser, G. & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
32.
Stasser, G. & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 304-313.
33.
Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116.
34.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35.
Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628.
36.
Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
37.
Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
38.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
39.
Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
40.
Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
41.
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (2000). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye and A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? (pp. 1-28). London: Sage.
