Although small group research has been marginalized within sociology during the past decades, the authors argue that a focus on interaction arenas can contribute to a more complete analysis of social life. Specifically, the authors examine three central domains of sociological analysis—culture, organizations, and the economy—to demonstrate how a focus on the mesolevel of analysis allows for a merging of macrosociology and microsociology. The authors draw on the perspective of sociological miniaturism to provide a model for cross-level research.
Abolafia, M. (1984). Structured anarchy. In P. Adler & P. Adler (Eds.), The social dynamics of financial markets (pp. 129-150). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Baker, W. (1984). The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 107-128.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Buenza, D., & Stark, D. (2004). Tools of the trade: The socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 369-400.
7.
Campbell, K., Marsden, P., & Hurlbert, J. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8, 97-117.
8.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the networked society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
9.
Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 984-1014.
10.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 735-794.
12.
Ely, R. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics on social identity and relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
13.
Fine, G. A. (1979). Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of Little League Baseball teams. American Sociological Review, 44, 733-745.
14.
Fine, G. A., & Kleinman, S. (1979). Rethinking subculture: An interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1-20.
15.
Friedman, B. (1993). Comments and discussion. Response to Shiller’s “Stock Prices and Social Dynamics.” In R. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 207-216). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
Geen, R. G. (1991). Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 377-399.
17.
Goffman, E. (1967). Where the action is. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction ritual (pp. 149-270). New York: Doubleday.
18.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17.
19.
Gouldner, A. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
20.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
21.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
22.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 25-56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. (1999). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 473-506.
24.
Hallett, T. (2003). Symbolic power and organizational culture. Sociological Theory, 21, 128-149.
25.
Harrington, B. (2001). Organizational performance and corporate social capital. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 18, 83-106.
26.
Harrington, B. (2005). The content of network ties: A multi-method study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
Harrington, B. (in press). Pop finance: Investment clubs and the new ownership society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Harrington, B., & Fine, G. (2000). Opening the “black box”: Small groups and twenty-first-century sociology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 312-323.
29.
Hurlbert, J., Haines, V., & Beggs, J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations? American Sociological Review, 65, 598-618.
30.
Ibarra, H. (1992a). Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Toward a network theory of getting things done. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp.156-189). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
Ibarra, H. (1992b). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
32.
Katona, G. (1975). Psychological economics. New York: Elsevier.
33.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.”Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
35.
Lin, N., Woelfel, M., & Light, S. (1985). The buffering effect of social support subsequent to an important life event. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 247-263.
36.
Marsden, P., & Hurlbert, J. (1988). Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. Social Forces, 66, 1038-1059.
37.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
Mizruchi, M. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298.
39.
National Association of Investors Corporation. (2002). NAIC factbook. Available at www.betterinvesting.org/about/fact.html
40.
National Association of Securities Dealers. (1997). National Investor Survey. Washington, DC: Peter D. Hart Research Associates.
41.
O’Barr, W., & Conley, J. (1992). Fortune and folly: The wealth and power of institutional investing. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
42.
Podolny, J. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 33-60.
43.
Podolny, J., & Baron, J. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693.
44.
Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320-1350.
45.
Samuelson, R. (1999, November 11). Stocks without risks? Newsweek, p. 62.
46.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.
47.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
48.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: Oklahoma Book Exchange.
49.
Shiller, R. (1993). Stock prices and social dynamics. In R. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 167-207). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
51.
Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
52.
Stolte, J., Fine, G. A., & Cook, K. (2001). Sociological miniaturism: Seeing the big through the small in social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 387-413.
53.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
54.
Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
55.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
56.
Weisberg, J. (1998, January 25). United shareholders of America. New York Times Magazine, p. 30.
57.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
