This study describes the formation of a dispersed team and the communication processes to evolve in this team. The authors examine how the members of such a team actually used e-mail for communication instead of starting from assumptions concerning the richness or leanness of the communication medium being used. Aspects of group formation and group composition are considered, and team member behaviors in an occasional face-to-face meeting are described. Observing how communication actually unfolds will allows the authors to review media richness theory’s claim that teams need face-to-face communication or another allegedly rich communication medium for effective communication about complex problems or equivocal tasks. The team to be described is a international group of researchers who joined a mailing list dedicated to preparing a research proposal that was to be funded by the EU.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackhoff, R. L. , & Halbert, M. (1958). An operations research study of the scientific activity of chemists. Cleveland, OH: Operations Research Group, Case Institute of Technology.
2.
Adrianson, L. (2001). Gender and computer-mediated communication: Group processes in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 71-94.
3.
Allen, T. J. (1970). Communication networks inR&D laboratories. Journal of R&D Management, 1, 14-21.
4.
Atkinson, P. , & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Ayman, R. (2000, November 2-3). Impact of team diversity on collaboration dynamics. Paper presented at the IIT Symposium, “Collaborating Across Professional Boundaries: From Education to Practice,”Chicago.
6.
Barker, V. E. , Abrams, J. R., Tiyaamornwong, V., Seibold, D. R., Duggan, A., Park, H. S., et al. (2000). New contexts for relational communication in groups. Small Group Research, 31(4), 470-503.
7.
Barkhi, R. , Jacob, V. S., Pipino, L., & Pirkul, H. (1998). A study of the effect of communication channel and authority on group decision processes and outcomes. Decision Support Systems, 23, 205-226.
8.
Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication, 18, 133-170.
9.
Blecherman, B. (1999). Adopting automated negotiation. Technology in Society, 21, 167-174.
10.
Bordia, P. , Difonzo, N., & Chang, A. (1999). Rumor as group problem solving; Development patterns in informal computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 30(1), 8-28.
11.
Borges, M. R. S. , Pino, J. A., Fuller, D. A., & Salgado, A. C. (1999). Key issues in the design of an asynchronous system to support meeting preparation. Decision Support Systems, 27, 269-287.
12.
Burke, K. , Aytes, K. G., Chidambaram, L., & Johnson, J. J. (1999). A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance. Small Group Research, 30(4), 453-490.
13.
Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20(2), 143-166.
14.
Coleman, L. H. , Paternite, C. E., & Sherman, R. C. (1999). A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 51-65.
15.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233.
16.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
17.
Daft, R. L. , Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-366.
18.
Daft, R. L. , & Wiginton, J. C. (1979). Language and organization. Academy of Management Review, 4, 179-191.
19.
Dennis, A. R. , & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effect of cues, feedback and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 30-33.
20.
Dennis, A. R. , Kinney, S. T., & Hung, Y.-T. C. (1999). Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Research, 30(4), 405-437.
21.
Dennis, A. R. , & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
22.
Duxbury, L. , & Neufeld, D. (1999). An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16(1), 1-28.
23.
El-Shinnawy, M. , & Markus, M. L. (1997). The poverty of media richness theory: Explaining people’s choice of electronic mail vs. voice mail. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 443-467.
24.
Frost, P. A. , & Whitley, R. (1971). Communication patterns in a research laboratory. R&D Management, 1(2), 71-79.
25.
Fulk, J. , & Collins-Jarvis, L. (2000). Wired meetings: Technological mediation of organizational gatherings. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 624-663). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Fulk, J. , Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Gersick, C. I. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
28.
Hiltz, S. , Johnson, K., & Thuroff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
29.
Hollingshead, A. B. , McGrath, J. E., & O’Conner, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24(3), 307-333.
30.
Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53-75). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
31.
Kiesler, S. , & Sproull, L. S. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 52, 96-123.
32.
Klandermans, B. , & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519-531.
33.
Kock, N. (1998). Can communication medium limitations foster better group outcomes? An action research study. Information & Management, 34, 295-305.
34.
Lea, M. , O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
35.
Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 143-157.
36.
LiPera, S. D. (1996). The impact of new media: A model for the use of desktop video-conferencing in negotiations (Thesis Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley). Retrieved from http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/impact/f96/Projects/slipera/%23end5
37.
Mabry, E. A. (1997). Framing flames: The structure of argumentative messages on the Net. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/
38.
Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527.
39.
Ngwenyama, O. K. , & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145-167.
40.
Orengo, V. , Zornoza, A. M., Prieto, F., & Peiró, J. M. (2000). The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 141-159.
41.
Orlikowski, W. J. , & Yates, J. A. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.
42.
Pelz, D. C. , & Andrews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development (Rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
43.
Poltrock, S. E. , & Engelbeck, G. (1999). Requirements for a virtual collocation environment. Information and Software Technology, 41, 331-339.
44.
Rafaeli, S. , & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(2). Retrieved September 30, 2002, from www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
45.
Riley, M. W. (1963). Sociological research: A case approach (Vol. 1). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
46.
Sanderson, D. (1994). Mediated collaborative research? Claims, evidence, and a case study of a distributed science group. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2, 41-65.
47.
Shaw, J. B. , & Barrett-Power, E. (1998). The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations, 51, 1307-1325.
48.
Short, W. E. , Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
49.
Siegel, J. , Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
50.
Spears, R. , Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1991). De-individuation and group polarization in computer mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
51.
Sudweeks, F. , & Allbritton, M. (1996). Working together apart: Communication and collaboration in a networked group. In C. D. Keen, C. Urquhart, & J. Lamp (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference of Information Systems (ACIS96) (Vol. 2, pp. 701-712). Hobart: University of Tasmania, Department of Computer Science.
52.
Suh, K. O. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35, 295-312.
53.
Townsend, A. M. , DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17-29.
54.
Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
55.
Tuckman, B. , & Jensen, M. (1977). Stages of small-group development. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
56.
Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communications: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186-203.
57.
Walther, J. B. , Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 460-487.
58.
Walther, J. B. , & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
59.
Warkentin, M. E. , Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a Web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975-996.
60.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
61.
Williams, F. , Rice, E. R., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press.
