This study examined male and female decision making under risk and uncertainty at both the individual and the group levels. Participants included 163 undergraduate business students who responded to four business decision-making scenarios individually and in groups of varying gender composition. The results of this study raise a number of important issues regarding patterns of risk tolerance among male and female decision makers, both as sole decision makers and as members of decision-making teams in organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Berger, J. , Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
3.
Berger, J. , Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
4.
Berger, J. , Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.
5.
Berger, J. , Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479-508.
6.
Busenitz, L. (1999). Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision-making: It’s a matter of perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 325-340.
7.
Byrnes, J. (1998). The nature and development of decision-making: A self-regulation model. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Byrnes, J. , Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383.
9.
Carli, L. (1982). Are women more social and men more task-oriented? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in group interaction, reward allocation, coalition formation, and cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
10.
Dobbins, G. H. , Long, W. S., Dedrick, E. J., & Clemons, T. C. (1990). The role of self-monitoring and gender on leader emergence: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Management, 16, 609-618.
11.
Driskell, J. E. , Olmstead, B., & Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues and influence in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 51-60.
12.
Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971-981.
13.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Gender differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Eagly, A. H. , & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influence ability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.
15.
Eagly, A. H. , & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915-928.
16.
Eagly, A. H. , & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315.
17.
Fennell, M. L. , Barchas, P. R., Cohen, E. G., McMahon, A. M., & Hildebrand, P. (1978). An alternative perspective on sex differences in organizational settings: The process of legitimization. Sex Roles, 4, 589-604.
18.
French, J. R. , & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
19.
Greenspan, M. (1983). A new approach to women and therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Hudgens, G. , & Fatkins, L. (1985). Gender differences in risk taking: Repeated sessions on a computer-simulated task. Journal of Psychology, 119, 197-206.
21.
Isen, A. M. , & Patrick, R. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 31, 194-202.
22.
Jackson, S. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.) Group Process and Productivity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Jamieson, B. (1977). Gender differences among drivers in yielding right-of-way. Psychological Reports, 41, 1243-1248.
24.
Johnson, E. , & Tversky, A. (1984). Representations of perceptions of risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113, 55-70.
25.
Johnson, J. , & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605-628.
26.
Johnson, J. , & Powell, P. (1994). Decision-making, risk and gender: Are managers different?British Journal of Management, 5, 123-138.
27.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
28.
Karakowsky, L. , & McBey, K. (in press). Do my contributions matter? The influence of imputed expertise on member involvement and self-evaluations in the work group. Group and Organization Management.
29.
Karakowsky, L. , & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631.
30.
Kelly, J. , Wildman, H., & Urey, J. (1982). Gender and gender role differences in group decision-making social interactions: A behavioral analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 112-127.
31.
Kent, R. L. , & Moss, S. E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1335-1346.
32.
Levin, I. , Snyder, M., & Chapman, D. (1988). The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. Journal of Psychology, 122, 173-181.
33.
Libby, R. , Trotman, K. T., & Zimmer, I. (1987). Member variation, recognition of expertise and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 81-87.
34.
Littlepage, G. E. , Whisler, E., Schmidt, G., & Frost, A. (1991). Social processes related to influence and performance in decision making groups. Paper presented at the Nags Head Conference on Groups, Networks and Organizations, Highland Beach, FL.
35.
Maccoby, E. , & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Press.
36.
Marshall, J. (1984). Women managers: Travelers in a male world. New York: John Wiley.
37.
Meeker, B. F. , & Weitzel-O’Neill, P. A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 91-105.
38.
Mittal, V. , & Ross, W., Jr. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 298-324.
39.
Myers, D. , & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602-627.
40.
Powell, G. N. (1988). Women and men in management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Sherer, M. , Maddux, J., Mecandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
42.
Sitkin, S. , & Weingart, L. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573-1592.
43.
Vancouver, J. B. , & Ilgen, D. R. (1989). Effects of interpersonal orientation and the sex-type of the task on choosing to work alone or in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 927-934.
44.
Whyte, G. , Saks, A., & Hook, S. (1989). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 415-432.
45.
Wood, W. , & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 341-347.
46.
Zinkhan, G. , & Karande, K. (1991). Cultural and gender differences in risk-taking behavior among American and Spanish decision makers. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 741-742.
