A Small Group Socialization Scale (SGSS) was developed and tested for reliability and validity. In Study 1, scale items were developed by reviewing research as well as asking group members for open-ended responses regarding fitting in, comfort, certainty, and satisfaction with recent group experiences. Thirty-five items were developed and administered to 445 college student participants. Subsequent reliability and factor analyses resulted in the identification of 14 items reflecting group socialization. In Study 2, the SGSS along with measures of cohesion, consensus, communication satisfaction, and loneliness were administered to 210 small group communication students. Based on acceptable reliability coefficients and correlation coefficients, concurrent validity for the SGSS was demonstrated. Implications for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, M. B. , & Frey, L. R. (1997). The fragile community: Living together with AIDS. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Anderson, C. M. , & Martin, M. M. (1995). The effects of communication motives, interaction involvement, and loneliness on satisfaction: A model of small groups. Small Group Research, 26, 118-137.
3.
Anderson, C. M. , & Martin, M. M. (1999). How argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness relate to cohesion, consensus, and satisfaction in small groups. Communication Reports, 12, 21-31.
4.
Anderson, C. M. , Martin, M. M., & Infante, D. A. (1999). Decision-making collaboration scale: Tests of validity. Communication Research Reports, 15, 245-255.
5.
Anderson, C. M. , Riddle, B. L., & Martin, M. M. (1999). Socialization processes in groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 139-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
7.
Ashford, S. J. , & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370-398.
8.
Bales, R. F. , & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 485-495.
9.
Berger, C. R. (1975). Proactive and retroactive attribution processes in interpersonal communications. Human Communication Research, 2, 33-50.
10.
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122-144). Baltimore: University Park Press.
11.
Berger, C. R. , & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some exploration in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
12.
Bonito, J. A. , & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 227-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Bowers, J. W. , & Courtright, J. A. (1984). Communication research methods. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
14.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1990). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Communication Studies, 41, 212-236.
15.
Cusella, L. P. (1987). Feedback, motivation, and performance. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 624-678). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
DeStephen, R. S. , & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Small group consensus: Stability of group support of the decision, task process, and group relationships. Small Group Behavior, 19, 227-239.
17.
Elias, F. G. , Johnson, M. E., & Fortman, J. B. (1989). Task-focused self-disclosure: Effects on group cohesiveness, commitment to task, and productivity. Small Group Behavior, 20, 87-96.
18.
Evans, C. R. , & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
19.
Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 433-452.
20.
Frey, L. R. (1997). Individuals in groups. In L. R. Frey & J. K. Barge (Eds.), Managing group life: Communicating in decision-making groups (pp. 52-79). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Gouran, D. S. (1997). Effective versus ineffective group decision making. In L. R. Frey & J. K. Barge (Eds.), Managing group life: Communicating in decision-making groups (pp. 133-155). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22.
Gouran, D. S. (1999). Communication in groups: The emergence and evolution of a field of study. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 3-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Hare, A. P. (1980). Consensus versus majority vote: A laboratory experiment. Small Group Behavior, 11, 131-143.
24.
Haslett, B. B. , & Ruebush, J. (1999). What differences do individual differences in groups make? The effects of individuals, culture, and group composition. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 115-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Hecht, M. L. (1978). Measurement of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 350-368.
26.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Hess, J. A. (1993). Assimilating newcomers into an organization: A cultural perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 189-210.
28.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , Erbert, L., & Hurst, A. (1996). Communication and group decision-making effectiveness. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 269-300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Infante, D. A. , & Rancer, A. S. (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research. Communication Yearbook, 19, 319-351.
30.
Jablin, F. M. (1982). Organizational communication: An assimilation approach. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 225-286). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Jablin, F. M. (1884). Assimilating new members into organizations. Communication Year-book, 8, 594-626.
32.
Jablin, F. M. (1987). Organizational entry, assimilation, and exit. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 679-740). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262-279.
34.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35.
Keyton, J. (1999). Group communication: Process and analysis. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
36.
Lester, R. E. (1987). Organizational culture, uncertainty reduction, and the socialization of new organizational members. In S. Thomas (Ed.), Culture and communication: Methodology, behavior, artifacts, and institutions: Selected proceedings from the Fifth International Conference on Culture and Communication (pp. 105-113). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37.
Martin, M. M. , & Anderson, C. A. (1998, April). Interpersonal communication motives in small groups. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Saratoga Springs, NY.
38.
McCroskey, J. C. , & Young, T. J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5, 375-382.
39.
Meyers, R. A. , & Brashers, D. E. (1999). Influence processes in group interaction. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 288-312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Mignerey, J. T. , Rubin, R. B., & Gorden, W. I. (1995). Organizational entry: An investigation of newcomer communication behavior and uncertainty. Communication Research, 22, 54-58.
41.
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relationships. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 137-192). San Diego: Academic Press.
42.
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1984). Role transition in small groups. In V. L. Allen & E. VandeVliert (Eds.), Role transitions: Explorations and explanations (pp. 181-195). New York: Plenum.
43.
Pace, R. C. (1988). Communication patterns in high- and low-consensus discussions: A descriptive analysis. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 53, 184-202.
44.
Pavitt, C. , & Curtis, E. (1998). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (3rd. ed.) [Online]. Available: www.udel.edu/communication356/pavitt
45.
Pepper, G. L. (1995). Communicating in organizations: A cultural approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Poole, M. S. (1999). Group communication theory. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Grouan, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 37-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Poole, M. S. , & Baldwin, C. L. (1996). Developmental processes in group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 215-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Putnam, L. L. , & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
49.
Riddle, B. L. (1994). Organizational communication, uncertainty reduction, and role-identity salience in the socialization of entering college students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10A), 3793. (University Microfilms No. AAI96-04454)
50.
Rook, K. S. (1988). Toward a more differentiated view of loneliness. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 579-590). New York: John Wiley.
51.
Rosenfeld, L. B. , & Gilbert, J. R. (1989). The measurement of cohesion and its relationship to dimensions of self-disclosure in classroom settings. Small Group Behavior, 20, 291-301.
52.
Russell, D. , Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
53.
Scheerhorn, D. , & Geist, P. (1995). Social dynamics in groups. In L. R. Frey & J. K. Barge (Eds.), Managing group life (pp. 81-103). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
54.
Schein, E. H. (1968). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Industrial Management Review, 9, 1-16.
55.
Schultz, B. G. (1999). Improving group communication performance: An overview of diagnosis and intervention. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 371-394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Schutz, W. C. (1966). The interpersonal underworld (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
57.
Spillman, B. , Bezdek, J., & Spillman, R. (1979). Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus. Communication Monographs, 46, 1-12.
58.
Spitzberg, B. H. , & Cupach, W. R. (1989). Handbook of interpersonal competence research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
59.
Stockton, R. , & Hulse, D. (1981). Developing cohesion in small groups: Theory and research. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 6, 188-195.
60.
Thomas, E. J. , & Fink, C. F. (1961). Models of group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 53-63.
61.
Worchel, S. (1994). You can go home again: Returning group research to the group context with an eye on developmental issues. Small Group Research, 25, 205-223.
62.
Zakahi, W. R. , & Duran, R. L. (1985). Loneliness, communicative competence, and communication apprehension: Extension and replication. Communication Quarterly, 33, 50-60.
