Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). New York: Free Press.
3.
Bales, R. F. , & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
4.
Benne, K. D. , & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41-49.
5.
Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups, and other papers. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
9.
Keyton, J. (1999). Relational communication in groups. In L. F. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 192-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7-27.
11.
Meyers, R. A. , & Brashers, D. E. (1994). Expanding the boundaries of small group communication research: Exploring a feminist perspective. Communication Studies, 45, 68-85.
12.
Poole, M. S. , Keyton, J., & Frey, L. R. (1999). Group communication methodology: Issues and considerations. In L. F. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 92-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Poole, M. S. , Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
14.
Propp, K. M. , & Kreps, G. L. (1994). A rose by any other name: The vitality of group communication research. Communication Studies, 45, 7-19.
15.
Putnam, L. L. , & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
16.
Putnam, L. L. , & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Sanderlin, R. (1994). [On-line]. Available: gopher://csf.Colorado.edu:70/0R18809-21293-/hac/CoHousing/1994/jun94
18.
Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19.
Seibold, D. R. , & Meyers, R. A. (1988, June). What has group research done for us lately? An expanded view of “group research,” and prospects for the future. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
20.
Special section on the measurement of cohesion . (2000). Small Group Research, 31, 71-118.
21.
Stock, D. , & Thelen, H. A. (1958). Emotional dynamics and group culture: Experimental studies of individual and group behavior. New York: University Press.
22.
Wheelan, S. A. (Ed.). (1999). Group development [Special issue]. Small Group Research, 30(1).
23.
Wheelan, S. A. , McKeage, R. L., Verdi, A. F., Abraham, M., Krasick, C., & Johnston, F. (1994). Communication and developmental patterns in a system of interacting groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 153-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.