Over the years, with the construction of increasingly longer and lighter bridges, dynamic behavior has become a limiting factor in the design of these structures and the significant interest in developing structural vibration control systems. Among the variety of materials currently used for vibration suppression, the use of shape memory alloys (SMAs) sounds as an uncommon solution. These materials have gained popularity due to their ability to undergo large reversible deformations, coupled with their energy dissipation properties. In this context, this study aims to achieve passive vibration control in a scaled-down prototype of a cable-stayed bridge using superelastic mini-springs made from NiTi (Nitinol) SMA. In this study, dynamic analyses of the structure based on the experimental results showed up to a 75% reduction in force transmissibility in free vibration compared to a similar structure with steel springs. In forced vibration, the force transmissibility reduction reached up to 85.5%. It was concluded that SMA mini-springs have the capability to dissipate vibrational energy for application in bridge structures.
AbavisaniIRezaifarOKheyroddinA (2021) Multifunctional properties of shape memory materials in civil engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering44: 102657.
2.
ABNT NBR 15307 (2006) Non-destructive testing – Dynamic load test on large structures – Procedure. Associação Brasileira de Normas Tércnicas [ Brazilian Technical Rules Association].
3.
AdachiYUnjohS (1999) Development of shape memory alloy damper for intelligent bridge systems. In: Smart Structures and Materials 1999: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, vol. 3671. SPIE. DOI: 10.1117/12.348687.
4.
AnS-MRyuJChoM, et al. (2012) Engineering design framework for a shape memory alloy coil spring actuator using a static two-state model. Smart Materials and Structures21(5): 055009.
Ben MekkiOAuricchioF (2011) Performance evaluation of shape-memory-alloy superelastic behavior to control a stay cable in cable-stayed bridges. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics46(2): 470–477.
7.
CasciatiFFaravelliLFugginiC (2008) Cable vibration mitigation by added SMA wires. Acta Mechanica195(1–4): 141–155.
8.
CasciatiSMarziA (2011) Fatigue tests on SMA bars in span control. Engineering Structures33(4): 1232–1239.
9.
ChangW-SArakiY (2016) Use of shape-memory alloys in construction: A critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering169(2): 87–95.
10.
CostanzaGTataME (2020) Shape memory alloys for aerospace, recent developments, and new applications: A short review. Materials13(8): 1856.
11.
DanDChenYXiaoR (2014) Dynamic properties analysis of a stay cable-damper system in consideration of design and construction factors. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration13(2): 317–326.
12.
DiengLHelbertGChiraniSA, et al. (2013) Use of shape memory alloys damper device to mitigate vibration amplitudes of bridge cables. Engineering Structures56: 1547–1556.
13.
DolceMCardoneD (2001) Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences43(11): 2657–2677.
14.
DongJCaiCSOkeilAM (2011) Overview of potential and existing applications of shape memory alloys in bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering16(2): 305–315.
15.
Dos ReisRPBSilvaPCSSenkoR, et al. (2019) Methodology for the estimation of material damping as applied to superelastic shape memory alloy mini-springs. Materials & Design161: 124–135.
16.
FangC (2022) SMAs for infrastructures in seismic zones: A critical review of latest trends and future needs. Journal of Building Engineering57: 104918.
17.
FaravelliLFugginiCUbertiniF (2009) Toward a hybrid control solution for cable dynamics: Theoretical prediction and experimental validation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring17(4): 386–403.
18.
FolladorMCianchettiMArientiA, et al. (2012) A general method for the design and fabrication of shape memory alloy active spring actuators. Smart Materials and Structures21(11): 115029.
19.
FujinoYSiringoringoD (2013) Vibration mechanisms and controls of long-span bridges: A review. Structural Engineering International23(3): 248–268.
20.
FumagalliLButeraFCodaA (2009) SmartFlex® NiTi wires for shape memory actuators. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance18(5–6): 691–695.
21.
GhafooriEWangBAndrawesB (2022) Shape memory alloys for structural engineering: An editorial overview of research and future potentials. Engineering Structures273: 115138.
22.
GimsingNJGeorgakisCT (2011) Cable Supported Bridges: Concept and Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
GraesserEJCozzarelliFA (1991) Shape-Memory alloys as new materials for aseismic isolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics117(11): 2590–2608.
24.
HasanMMBaxevanisT (2022) Structural fatigue and fracture of shape memory alloy actuators: Current status and perspectives. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures33(12): 1475–1486.
25.
HeidariBKadkhodaeiMBaratiM, et al. (2016) Fabrication and modeling of shape memory alloy springs. Smart Materials and Structures25(12): 125003.
26.
HosseiniRRashidiMBulajićBĐ, et al. (2020) Multi-objective optimization of three different SMA-LRBs for seismic protection of a benchmark highway bridge against real and synthetic ground motions. Applied Sciences10(12): 4076.
27.
HuangHSunLJiangX (2012) Vibration mitigation of stay cable using optimally tuned MR damper. Smart Structures and Systems9(1): 35–53.
28.
JaniJMLearyMSubicA, et al. (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Materials & Design56: 1078–1113.
29.
JankeLCzaderskiCMotavalliM, et al. (2005) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—Overview, limits and new ideas. Materials and Structures38(5): 578–592.
30.
JavanbakhtMChengSGhribF (2020) Multimode vibration control of stay cables using optimized negative stiffness damper. Structural Control and Health Monitoring27(4): 1–25. DOI: 10.1002/stc.2503
31.
JavanmardiAGhaediKHuangF, et al. (2022) Application of structural control systems for the cables of cable-stayed bridges: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering29(3): 1611–1641.
32.
LarsenALaroseGL (2015) Dynamic wind effects on suspension and cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Sound and Vibration334: 2–28.
33.
LiHLiuMOuJ (2004) Vibration mitigation of a stay cable with one shape memory alloy damper. Structural Control and Health Monitoring11(1): 21–36.
LiSDezfuliFHWangJQ, et al. (2018) Longitudinal seismic response control of long-span cable-stayed bridges using shape memory alloy wire-based lead rubber bearings under near-fault records. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29(5): 703–728.
36.
LiuA-RYuQ-CZhangJ-P, et al. (2011) Study on vibration control of long cable with shape memory alloy damper. Advanced Science Letters4(8): 3023–3026.
37.
LiuMLiHSongG, et al. (2007) Investigation of vibration mitigation of stay cables incorporated with superelastic shape memory alloy dampers. Smart Materials and Structures16(6): 2202–2213.
38.
LiuM-YZuoDJonesNP (2013) Analytical and numerical study of deck-stay interaction in a cable-stayed bridge in the context of field observations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics139(11): 1636–1652.
39.
LiZQXuYLZhouLM (2006) Adjustable fluid damper with SMA actuators. Smart Materials and Structures15(5): 1483–1492.
40.
MirzaeifarRDesRochesRYavariA (2011) A combined analytical, numerical, and experimental study of shape-memory-alloy helical springs. International Journal of Solids and Structures48(3–4): 611–624.
41.
MoraesYJOSilvaAARodriguesMC, et al. (2018) Dynamical analysis applied to passive control of vibrations in a structural model incorporating SMA-SE coil springs. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering2018(1): 1–15. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2025839.
42.
Muntasir BillahAHMRahmanJZhangQ (2022) Shape memory alloys (SMAs) for resilient bridges: A state-of-the-art review. Structures37: 514–527.
43.
NguyenTPAl-MosaweAAl-MahaidiR (2021) State of the art review of the application of SMA in steel bridges. In: NguyenTPAl-MosaweAAl-MahaidiR (eds) Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Sustainability and Innovations. pp.1403–1408. CRC Press.
44.
OliveiraAGSilvaAARodriguesMC, et al. (2025) Helicopter vibration control employing superelastic pitch link with shape memory alloy. Journal of Vibration and Control. 31(13–14): 2676–2688. DOI: 10.1177/10775463241259568
45.
OzbulutOEHurlebausSDesrochesR (2011) Seismic response control using shape memory alloys: A review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures22(14): 1531–1549.
46.
PetriniLMigliavaccaF (2011) Biomedical applications of shape memory alloys. Journal of Metallurgy2011: 1–15.
47.
QianHLiHNSongG, et al. (2010) Seismic vibration control of civil structures using shape memory alloys: A review. In: Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp.3377–3395.
48.
RajoriyaSMishraSS (2024) Efficacy of SMA wire in vibration suppression of a stay cable: An experimental investigation. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance33(14): 6966–6985.
49.
RaoSS (2019) Vibration of Continuous Systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
50.
RoyDBuravallaVMangalgiriPD, et al. (2008) Mechanical characterization of NiTi SMA wires using a dynamic mechanical analyzer. Materials Science and Engineering A494(1–2): 429–435.
51.
SaadatSSalichsJNooriM, et al. (2002) An overview of vibration and seismic applications of NiTi shape memory alloy. Smart Materials and Structures11(2): 218–229.
52.
SaediSAcarERajiH, et al. (2023) Energy damping in shape memory alloys: A review. Journal of Alloys and Compounds956: 170286.
53.
SharabashAMAndrawesBO (2009) Application of shape memory alloy dampers in the seismic control of cable-stayed bridges. Engineering Structures31(2): 607–616.
54.
ShreekrishnaSNachimuthuRNairVS (2023) A review on shape memory alloys and their prominence in automotive technology. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures34: 499–524.
55.
SongGMaNLiH-N (2006) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Engineering Structures28(9): 1266–1274.
56.
SongMCaoDZhuW (2016) Dynamic analysis of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to a continuous sequence of moving forces. Advances in Mechanical Engineering8(12): 168781401668172.
57.
SunLChenLHuangH (2022) Stay cable vibration mitigation: A review. Advances in Structural Engineering25(16): 3368–3404.
58.
TabrizikahouAKuczmaMŁasecka-PluraM, et al. (2022) Application and modelling of Shape-memory alloys for structural vibration control: State-of-the-art review. Construction and Building Materials342: 127975.
59.
TorraVAuguetCIsalgueA, et al. (2013) Built in dampers for stayed cables in bridges via SMA. The SMARTeR-ESF project: A mesoscopic and macroscopic experimental analysis with numerical simulations. Engineering Structures49: 43–57.
60.
ValdevinoHPMSilvaAAMoraesYJO, et al. (2025) Passive vibration control applied to a building prototype incorporating a friction damping device. International Journal of Dynamics and Control13(3): 110.
61.
VirlogeuxM (2005) State-of-the-art in cable vibrations of cable-stayed bridges. Bridge Structures1(3): 133–168.
62.
ZareieSIssaASSeethalerRJ, et al. (2020) Recent advances in the applications of shape memory alloys in civil infrastructures: A review. Structures27: 1535–1550.
63.
ZhouPLiuMLiH, et al. (2018) Experimental investigations on seismic control of cable-stayed bridges using shape memory alloy self-centering dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring25(7): e2180.
64.
ZuoX-BLiA-QSunXH, et al. (2009) Optimal design of shape memory alloy damper for cable vibration control. Journal of Vibration and Control15(6): 897–921.
