This paper examines the impact of brief but intense thermal cycling on surface-bonded guided waves (GW) piezoelectric transducers (PZT). The effects on both electromechanical impedance (EMI) self-diagnostic measurements and Lamb wave emission and reception performance are investigated through experimental and numerical studies. EMI spectra are acquired in the 80–400 kHz range with both the real and imaginary parts being studied. GW pitch-catch measurements are conducted for two frequency ranges (15–25 kHz and 150–250 kHz) to investigate the two fundamental Lamb wave modes. Furthermore, laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) scans are performed to detect and localize transducer debondings. A finite element model of a surface bonded PZT is used to reproduce qualitatively both pitch-catch measurements and EMI spectrum in order to test the impact of different parameters and to support the interpretation of the test results. Two types of evolution with thermal cycling have been identified, each with distinct EMI and GW signatures. Firstly, the PZTs show a uniform 15%–20% reduction in GW sensing capabilities across the studied frequency range, with unchanged emission capabilities. This behavior is associated with irreversible effects of the thermal cycling on the constitutive properties of the PZT (mainly on the relative permittivity) and, to a lesser extent, to the evolution of the mechanical properties of the bonding layer. Secondly, a unique signature of partial PZT debondings is exhibited on the EMI spectra and LDV scans. The debonding has little impact on the GW signals at low frequency but results in amplitude changes and phase delays of both the received and emitted waveforms in the higher frequency range.
AiDLuoHZhuH (2017) Diagnosis and validation of damaged piezoelectric sensor in electromechanical impedance technique. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures28(7): 837–850.
2.
AttarianVACeglaFBCawleyP (2014) Long-term stability of guided wave structural health monitoring using distributed adhesively bonded piezoelectric transducers. Structural Health Monitoring13(3): 265–280.
BlackshireJLGiurgiutiuVCooneyA, et al. (2005) Characterization of sensor performance and durability for structural health monitoring systems. In: Advanced sensor technologies for nondestructive evaluation and structural health monitoring II (eds N Meyendorf, GY Baaklini and B Michel), San Diego, CA, p.66. Available at: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.599888 (accessed 5 July 2023).
5.
BuetheIEcksteinBFritzenC-P (2014) Model-based detection of sensor faults under changing temperature conditions. Structural Health Monitoring13(2): 109–119.
6.
ChanHLWChenYChoyCL (1996) Thermal hysteresis in the permittivity and polarization of lead zirconate titanate/vinylidenefluoride-trifluoroethylene 0-3 composites. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation3(6): 800–805.
7.
EirasJNGavérinaLRocheJ-M (2024) Durability assessment of bonded piezoelectric wafer active sensors for aircraft health monitoring applications. Sensors24(2): 2.
8.
FengTAliabadiMHF (2021) Structural integrity assessment of composites plates with embedded PZT transducers for structural health monitoring. Materials14(20): 6148.
GaoDWuZYangL, et al. (2018) Integrated impedance and Lamb wave–based structural health monitoring strategy for long-term cycle-loaded composite structure. Structural Health Monitoring17(4): 763–776.
11.
GavérinaLRocheJMBeauchêneP, et al. (2022) Study of the effects of thermal stress on piezoelectric sensors for the structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on structural health monitoring. Destech Publications, Inc. Available at: http://dpi-proceedings.com/index.php/shm2021/article/view/36353 (accessed 31 July 2023).
12.
Georges SabatRMukherjeeBKRenW, et al. (2007) Temperature dependence of the complete material coefficients matrix of soft and hard doped piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate ceramics. Journal of Applied Physics101(6): 064111.
13.
GiurgiutiuV (2005) Tuned Lamb wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures16(4): 291–305.
14.
GiurgiutiuV (2007) Structural Health Monitoring: With Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15.
GiurgiutiuVZagraiAJing BaoJ (2002) Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring1(1): 41–61.
16.
GorginRLuoYWuZ (2020) Environmental and operational conditions effects on Lamb wave based structural health monitoring systems: A review. Ultrasonics105: 106114.
17.
HaiderMFGiurgiutiuVLinB, et al. (2017) Irreversibility effects in piezoelectric wafer active sensors after exposure to high temperature. Smart Materials and Structures26(9): 095019.
18.
HaSChangF-K (2010) Adhesive interface layer effects in PZT-induced lamb wave propagation. Smart Materials and Structures19(2): 025006.
HostenBCastaingsM (2005) Finite elements methods for modeling the guided waves propagation in structures with weak interfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America117(3): 1108–1113.
HuynhT-CNguyenT-DHoDD, et al. (2020) Sensor Fault diagnosis for impedance monitoring using a piezoelectric-based smart interface technique. Sensors20(2): 510.
23.
IEEE (ed.) (1988) IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity. In: ANSI/IEEE Std 176–1987.
24.
JiangXZhangXTangT, et al. (2021) Electromechanical impedance based self-diagnosis of piezoelectric smart structure using principal component analysis and libsvm. Scientific Reports11(1): 11345.
25.
KeWCastaingsMBaconC (2009) 3D finite element simulations of an air-coupled ultrasonic NDT system. NDT & E International42(6): 524–533.
26.
LanzaraGYoonYKimY, et al. (2009) Influence of interface degradation on the performance of piezoelectric actuators. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures20(14): 1699–1710.
27.
MastromatteoLGaverinaLLavelleF, et al. (2023) Thermal cycling durability of bonded PZT transducers used for the SHM of reusable launch vehicles. In: RizzoPMilazzoA (eds) European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp.727–736. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-07258-1_73 (accessed 1 December 2024).
28.
MitraMGopalakrishnanS (2016) Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Materials and Structures25(5): 053001.
29.
Moix-BonetMBuetheIBachM, et al. (2014) Durability of co-bonded piezoelectric transducers. Procedia Technology15: 638–647.
30.
MuellerIFritzenC-P (2017) Inspection of piezoceramic transducers used for structural health monitoring. Materials10(1): 71.
31.
MuellerIShpakAGolubMV, et al. (2016) Effects of debonding of PWAS on the wave propagation and the electro-mechanical impedance spectrum. In: Proceedings of the 8th European workshop on structural health monitoring, Bilbao.
32.
ParkGFarrarCRRutherfordAC, et al. (2006b) Piezoelectric active sensor self-diagnostics using electrical admittance measurements. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics128(4): 469–476.
33.
ParkGFarrarCRScaleaFLD, et al. (2006a) Performance assessment and validation of piezoelectric active-sensors in structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures15(6): 1673–1683.
34.
ParkSParkGYunC-B, et al. (2009) Sensor self-diagnosis using a modified impedance model for active sensing-based structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring8(1): 71–82.
35.
QingXPChanH-LBeardSJ, et al. (2006) Effect of adhesive on the performance of piezoelectric elements used to monitor structural health. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives26(8): 622–628.
36.
RaghavanACesnikCES (2005) Finite-dimensional piezoelectric transducer modeling for guided wave based structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures14(6): 1448–1461.
37.
RaghavanACesnikCES (2008) Effects of elevated temperature on guided-wave structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures19(12): 1383–1398.
38.
RenBLissendenCJ (2018) Modeling guided wave excitation in plates with surface mounted piezoelectric elements: Coupled physics and normal mode expansion. Smart Materials and Structures27(4): 045014.
39.
Saint-PierreNJayetYPerrissin-FabertI, et al. (1996) The influence of bonding defects on the electric impedance of a piezoelectric embedded element. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics29(12): 2976–2982.
40.
SalmanpourMSSharif KhodaeiZAliabadiMH (2016) Airborne transducer integrity under operational environment for structural health monitoring. Sensors16(12): 2110.
