Flexible and stretchable tactile sensors show promising applications in robotics, prosthetics, and wearable electronics. This paper demonstrates an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) based highly flexible, touch-sensitive pressure sensor using magnetic hydrogels. EIT technology has been explored for continuous distributed strain sensing and tactile imaging. Magnetic hydrogel composites are synthesized by simultaneous polymerization and crosslinking of acrylamide with magnetic carbonyl iron particles (CIPs). The effects of CIPs percentage on morphology, sensitivity, and electrical/mechanical properties is investigated. EIT accurately discerns pressure quantity, shape, and spatial distribution. Lower CIPs volume fractions (3%) exhibit maximum sensitivity to strain fields. Mechanical testing show the hydrogels have excellent fatigue resistance, ideal for repeated compression loading. The results demonstrate the potential of EIT with magnetic hydrogel composites for tactile sensing and imaging, with applications in soft robotics, prosthetics, and wearable electronics. The tunable sensitivity and multifunctionality make these soft composites promising materials for flexible electronics.
AdlerALionheartWR (2006) Uses and abuses of EIDORS: An extensible software base for EIT. Physiological Measurement27(5): S25–S42.
3.
AiYHsuTHWuDC, et al. (2018) An ultrasensitive flexible pressure sensor for multimodal wearable electronic skins based on large-scale polystyrene ball@reduced graphene-oxide core–shell nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Chemistry C6(20): 5514–5520.
4.
BauerSBauer-GogoneaSGrazI, et al. (2014) 25Th anniversary article: A soft future: From robots and sensor skin to energy harvesters. Advanced Materials26(1): 149–161.
5.
BinLXuCDongS, et al. (2021) Alignment of magnetic particles in hydrogel matrix: A novel anisotropic magnetic hydrogels for soft robotics. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures32(13): 1432–1440.
6.
CheneyMIsaacsonDNewellJC, et al. (1990) NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology2(2): 66–75.
7.
ChenHYangXGengJ, et al. (2023) A skin-like hydrogel for distributed force sensing using an electrical impedance tomography-based pseudo-array method. ACS Applied Electronic Materials5(3): 1451–1460.
8.
ChenYLiuH (2021) Location-dependent performance of large-area piezoresistive tactile sensors based on electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Sensors Journal21(19): 21622–21630.
9.
ChipotMLeeKSeoJK (2017) Mathematical model of conductive fabric-based flexible pressure sensor. Applied Mathematical Modelling48: 775–786.
10.
ChoiY-TXieLWereleyNM (2016) Testing and analysis of magnetorheological fluid sedimentation in a column using a vertical axis inductance monitoring system. Smart Materials and Structures25(4): 04LT01.
11.
DaiHThostensonET (2019) Large-area carbon nanotube-based flexible composites for ultra-wide range pressure sensing and spatial pressure mapping. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces11(51): 48370–48380.
12.
GongSSchwalbWWangY, et al. (2014) A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires. Nature Communications5(1): 3132.
13.
GuoZLiuZLiuW, et al. (2021) Multifunctional flexible polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite hydrogel for stress and strain sensor. Journal of Nanoparticle Research23(10): 1–15.
14.
HolderDS (2004) Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications. Florida: CRC Press.
15.
KatoYMukaiTHayakawaT, et al. Tactile sensor without wire and sensing element in the tactile region based on EIT method. In: Sensors, 2007, pp. 792–795. New York, NY: IEEE.
16.
KimD-HLuNGhaffariR, et al. (2011) Materials for multifunctional balloon catheters with capabilities in cardiac electrophysiological mapping and ablation therapy. Nature Materials10(4): 316–323.
17.
KimJLeeMShimHJ, et al. (2014) Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nature Communications5(1): 5747.
18.
LeeHKwonDChoH, et al. (2017) Soft nanocomposite based multi-point, multi-directional strain mapping sensor using anisotropic electrical impedance tomography. Scientific Reports7(1): 1–10
19.
LiangGWangYMeiD, et al. (2015) Flexible capacitive tactile sensor array with truncated pyramids as dielectric layer for three-axis force measurement. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems24(5): 1510–1519.
20.
LiuZZhangTYangM, et al. (2021) Hydrogel pressure distribution sensors based on an imaging strategy and machine learning. ACS Applied Electronic Materials3(8): 3599–3609.
21.
LuYQuXZhaoW, et al. (2020) Highly stretchable, elastic, and sensitive mxene-based hydrogel for flexible strain and pressure sensors. Research2020: 1–13.
22.
NelaLTangJCaoQ, et al. (2018) Large-area high-performance flexible pressure sensor with carbon nanotube active matrix for electronic skin. Nano Letters18(3): 2054–2059.
23.
ParkS-HLeeHBYeonSM, et al. (2016) Flexible and stretchable piezoelectric sensor with thickness-tunable configuration of electrospun nanofiber mat and elastomeric substrates. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces8(37): 24773–24781.
24.
PuXLiuMChenX, et al. (2017) Ultrastretchable, transparent triboelectric nanogenerator as electronic skin for biomechanical energy harvesting and tactile sensing. Science Advances3(5): 1–10.
25.
RussoSNefti-MezianiSCarbonaroN, et al. (2017) A quantitative evaluation of drive pattern selection for optimizing EIT-based stretchable sensors. Sensors17(9): 1999.
26.
SarwarMSDobashiYPrestonC, et al. (2017) Bend, stretch, and touch: Locating a finger on an actively deformed transparent sensor array. Science Advances3(3): 1–8.
27.
Silvera-TawilDRyeDSoleimaniM, et al. (2015) Electrical impedance tomography for artificial sensitive robotic skin: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal15(4): 2001–2016.
28.
SunJYKeplingerCWhitesidesGM, et al. (2014) Ionic skin. Advanced Materials26(45): 7608–7614.
29.
TallmanTNGungorSWangKW, et al. (2015) Tactile imaging and distributed strain sensing in highly flexible carbon nanofiber/polyurethane nanocomposites. Carbon95: 485–493.
30.
MATLAB (2022) The MathWorks Inc. MATLAB version: 9.13.0 (R2022b), Natick, MA. https://www.math-works.com
31.
ViventiJKimD-HVigelandL, et al. (2011) Flexible, foldable, actively multiplexed, high-density electrode array for mapping brain activity in vivo. Nature Neuroscience14(12): 1599–1605.
32.
WangFLiuSShuL, et al. (2017) Low-dimensional carbon based sensors and sensing network for wearable health and environmental monitoring. Carbon121: 353–367.
33.
WangM (2002) Inverse solutions for electrical impedance tomography based on conjugate gradients methods. Measurement Science and Technology13(1): 101–117.
34.
WangZCongYFuJ (2020) Stretchable and tough conductive hydrogels for flexible pressure and strain sensors. Journal of Materials Chemistry B8(16): 3437–3459.
WebbRCBonifasAPBehnazA, et al. (2013) Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nature Materials12(10): 938–944.
37.
WebbRCMaYKrishnanS, et al. (2015) Epidermal devices for noninvasive, precise, and continuous mapping of macrovascular and microvascular blood flow. Science Advances1(9): 1–13.
XuRWangWSunJ, et al. (2019) A flexible, conductive and simple pressure sensor prepared by electroless silver plated polyester fabric. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects578: 123554.
40.
YangTXieDLiZ, et al. (2017) Recent advances in wearable tactile sensors: Materials, sensing mechanisms, and device performance. Materials Science and Engineering R Reports115: 1–37.
41.
ZangYZhangFHuangD, et al. (2015) Flexible suspended gate organic thin-film transistors for ultra-sensitive pressure detection. Nature Communications6(1): 6269.
42.
ZhangXShengNWangL, et al. (2019) Supramolecular nanofibrillar hydrogels as highly stretchable, elastic and sensitive ionic sensors. Materials Horizons6(2): 326–333.
43.
ZouXLiangTLopezN, et al. (2017) Arrayed force sensors made of paper, elastomer, and hydrogel particles. Micromachines8(12): 356.
