The suspension strut mount plays a crucial role in any vehicular suspension system, where it acts as a connector (bolted) to the vehicular body and suspension strut. The mount’s purpose is to cushion the Vehicular impacts and reduce the jarring effect, noise, and vibration caused due to vehicle movement over the undulated roads. The self-loosening of bolts results because of the up and down impact of the spring cause the jounce bouncer to push and pull action at the mount interface, cause vibrations transmitted to the vehicle camber. Self-loosening leads to damage of mount followed by clunking noises, noisy steering, tire misalignment, and can cause discomfort to the passenger. Therefore, condition monitoring and assessment of an upper strut mount is necessary for vehicles. This paper studies the feasibility of the piezo Impedance-based Structural health monitoring (SHM) technique to monitor the self-loosening bolts in the upper strut mount of the suspension system (MacPherson strut suspension) of passenger car. The piezo coupled signatures were obtained experimentally by loosening all the three bolts (connected to strut bearing) through control torques through a digital torque wrench. All the experimental signatures were acquired with a single PZT patch bonded to the surface of the upper strut mount for loosening bolts with pre-tight loss. Progressive damage scenarios are simulated along with preload loss of either single bolt or all three bolts, respectively. Three different statistical damage indices were evaluated for damage quantification raised due to bolt loosening. A 3D numerical modeling of strut mount is done using ANSYS WORKBENCH, and piezo impedance signatures were acquired (hence converted to admittance) for validating the experimental signatures. In an overall, this study provides an insight into the loss of structural integrity due to the self-loosening of suspension bolts, which can be threatful to vehicular integrity.
Agilent Technologies (2019) Test and measurement catalogue, USA. Agilent Technologies.
2.
AktanAEHelmickiAJHuntVJ (1998) Issues in health monitoring for intelligent infrastructure. Smart Materials and Structures7: 674–692.
3.
AmeriniFMeoM (2011) Structural health monitoring of bolted joints using linear and nonlinear acoustic/ultrasound methods. Structural Health Monitoring10: 659–672.
4.
Autozone (2019) Available at: Autozone.com/diy/repair-guides/Hyundai Elantra and Cars-1999-05-strut-macpherson-strut-assembly-repair-guidehttps://:www.autozone.com/diy/repair-guides/hyundai-car (accessed 10 September 2019).
5.
BhallaS (2001) Smart system based automated health monitoring of structures. M.Eng. Thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
6.
BhallaSGuptaABansalS, et al. (2009) Ultra low-cost adaptations of electro-mechanical impedance technique for structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures20: 991–999.
7.
BhallaSSohCK (2004a) Structural health monitoring by piezo-impedance transducers. I: Modeling. Journal of Aerospace Engineering17: 154–165.
8.
BhallaSSohCK (2004b) Structural health monitoring by piezo–impedance transducers. II: Applications. Journal of Aerospace Engineering17: 166–175.
9.
BhallaSSohCK (2004c) Electro-mechanical impedance modeling for adhesively bonded piezo transducers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures15: 955–972.
10.
BhallaSYangYWZhaoJ, et al. (2005) Structural health monitoring of underground facilities – Technological issues and challenges. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology20: 487–500.
11.
CacceseVMewerRVelSS (2004) Detection of bolt load loss in hybrid composite/metal bolted connections. Engineering Structures26: 895–906.
12.
ChenDHuoLSongG (2020) EMI based multi-bolt looseness detection using series/parallel multi-sensing technique. Smart Materials and Structures25: 423–432.
13.
DahilL (2017) Effect on the vibration of the suspension system. Metalurgija56(3–4): 375–378.
14.
De CastroBABaptistaFGCiampaF (2019) New signal processing approach for structural health monitoring in noisy environments based on impedance measurements. Journal of the International Measurement Confederation137: 155–167.
15.
FanSLiWKongQ, et al. (2018) Monitoring of pin connection loosening using eletromechanical impedance: Numerical simulation with experimental verification. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29: 1964–1973.
GoodarziAKhajepourA (2017) Vehicle suspension system technology and design. Synthesis Lectures on Advances in Automotive Technology1: i–77.
18.
HeistermannCPavlovićMVeljkovićM, et al. (2017) Influence of execution tolerances for friction connections in circular and polygonal towers for wind converters. Advanced Steel Construction – An International Journal13: 343–360.
19.
HuoLChenDLiangY, et al. (2017) Impedance based bolt preload monitoring using piezoceramic smart washer. Smart Materials and Structures26: 057004.
20.
HuynhTCDangNLKimJT (2018) Preload monitoring in bolted connection using piezoelectric-based smart interface. Sensors18: 2766.
21.
HuynhTCHoDDDangNL, et al. (2019) Sensitivity of piezoelectric-based smart interfaces to structural damage in bolted connections. Sensors19: 3670.
22.
JugulkarLMSinghSSawantSM (2016) Analysis of suspension with variable stiffness and variable damping force for automotive applications. Advances in Mechanical Engineering8: 1–19.
23.
JunkerGH (1969) New criteria for self-loosening of fasteners under vibration. Sae Transactions78: 314–335.
24.
KakirdeADravidS (2017) Study of vibration loosening of bolted joints: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology5: 36–45.
25.
KimHLiuXAhnE, et al. (2019) Performance assessment method for crack repair in concrete using PZT-based electro-mechanical impedance technique. NDT & E International104: 90–97.
26.
LimHJKimMKSohnH, et al. (2011) Impedance based damage detection under varying temperature and loading conditions. NDT & E International44: 740–750.
27.
LiNWangFSongG (2020a) Monitoring of bolt looseness using piezoelectric transducers: Three-dimensional numerical modeling with experimental verification. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures31: 911–918.
28.
LiYLiuZWangY, et al. (2020b) Experimental study on behavior of time-related preload relaxation for bolted joints subjected to vibration in different directions. Tribology International142: 106005.
29.
LiuZWangBLiYZhangCChuH (2021) Analysis of self-loosening behavior of high strength bolts based on accurate thread modeling. Engineering Failure Analysis127, 105541.
30.
LuoZDengHLiL, et al. (2021) A simple PZT transducer design for electro-mechanical impedance (EMI)-based multi-sensing interrogation. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring11: 235–249.
31.
ManoharanSKDuempelmannCFriedrichC (2017) Condition monitoring of multi-bolted joints with combination of preload measurement and extended evaluation from FEA. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars—Mechanical Systems10: 385–390.
32.
MartowiczASendeckiASalamonM, et al. (2016) Application of electro-mechanical impedance-based SHM for damage detection in bolted pipeline connection. Nondestructive Testing And Evaluation31: 17–44.
33.
MascarenasDDParkGFarrarCR (2005) Monitoring of bolt preload using piezoelectric active devices. In: Health Monitoring and Smart Nondestructive Evaluation of Structural and Biological Systems IV, vol. 5768. International Society for Optics and Photonics. Tribikram Kundu. pp.129–136.
34.
MiaoRShenRZhangS, et al. (2020) A review of bolt tightening force measurement and loosening detection. Sensors20: 3165.
35.
MoharanaS (2021) Investigation of a continuum shear lag model as an indicator for the damage detection in Piezo-Elasto dynamic structure. Journal of Vibration Engineering Technologies. 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s42417-021-00326-6
36.
MoharanaSBhallaS (2012) Numerical investigations of shear lag effect on PZT-structure interaction: Review and application. Current Science103: 685–696.
37.
MoharanaSVishnuSA (2019) Condition health monitoring of a suspension strut cap/upper strut mount using piezoelectric sensor for electro-mechanical impedance technique. In: IX ECCOMAS thematic conference on smart structures and materials, Paris, France8–11 July 2019.
38.
NaWS (2017) Possibility of detecting wall thickness loss using a PZT based structural health monitoring method for metal based pipeline facilities. NDT & E International88: 42–50.
39.
NguyenKDLeeSYLeePY, et al. (2011) Wireless SHM for bolted connections via multiple PZT-interfaces and Imote2-platformed impedance sensor node. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on advanced smart materials and smart structures technology (ANCRiSST2011), Dalian, China, 25–26 July 2011, pp.25–26. Korea, Techno-Press.
40.
NguyenTCHuynhTCYiJH, et al. (2017) Hybrid bolt-loosening detection in wind turbine tower structures by vibration and impedance responses. Wind and Structures24: 385–403.
41.
NikraveshSMYGoudarziM (2017) A review paper on looseness detection methods in bolted structures. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures14: 2153–2176.
42.
OkugawaM (2004) Bolt loosening detection method by using smart washer adopted 4SID. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, CA, 19–22 April 2004, p.1981. Reston, VA: AIAA.
43.
OrganiscakMJ (2014) Model-based suspension calibration for hybrid vehicle ride and handling recovery. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Ohio.
44.
PaiNGHessDP (2002) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of threaded fastener loosening due to dynamic shear load. Engineering Failure Analysis9: 383–402.
45.
PanidisTPavelkoIPavelkoV, et al. (2014) Bolt-joint structural health monitoring by the method of electro-mechanical impedance. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology86: 207–214.
46.
ParkJHHuynhTCChoiSH, et al. (2015) Vision-based technique for bolt-loosening detection in wind turbine tower. Wind and Structures21: 709–726.
47.
ParkGSohnHFarrarCRInmanDJ (2003b) Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward The Shock and Vibration Digest. 35(5): 451–463.
48.
ParvasiSMHoSCMKongQ, et al. (2016) Real time bolt preload monitoring using piezoceramic transducers and time reversal technique—A numerical study with experimental verification. Smart Materials and Structures25: 085015.
49.
PavelkoV (2013) Electromechanical impedance for SHM of aircraft bolted joints. In: Non-destructive characterization for composite materials, aerospace engineering, civil infrastructure, and homeland security, San Diego, CA, 11 April 2013, vol. 8694, p.869410. SPIE, USA. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
50.
PI Ceramic (2019) Product information catalogue, Lindenstrabe, Germany. Available at: http://www.piceramic.de (accessed 30 November 2019).
51.
RusliMMardiantoCBurM (2006) Experimental analysis of bolt loosening dynamics characteristic in a beam by impact testing. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences13: 175–180.
52.
RutherfordACParkGFarrarCR (2007) Non-linear feature identifications based on self-sensing impedance measurements for structural health assessment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing21: 322–333.
53.
ShirahattiAPrasadPSPanzadeP, et al. (2008) Optimal design of passenger car suspension for ride and road holding. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering30: 66–76.
54.
SunFPChaudhryZRogersCA, et al. (1995) Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition. In: Proceedings of SPIE conference on smart structures and materials (ed ChopraI), San Diego, CA, 27 February–1 March 1995, vol. 2443, pp.236–247. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
55.
SunQLinQYangB, et al. (2020) Mechanism and quantitative evaluation model of slip-induced loosening for bolted joints. Assembly Automation40: 577–588.
56.
TawieRParkHBBaekJ, et al. (2019) Damage detection performance of the electro-mechanical impedance (EMI) technique with various attachment methods on glass fibre composite plates. Sensors19: 1000.
57.
TemitopeSJ (2015) Condition monitoring of bolted joints. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Sheffield, UK.
58.
TsengKKHNaiduASK (2002) Non-parametric damage detection and characterization using smart piezoceramic material. Smart Materials and Structures11(3): 317–329.
59.
WangDSongHZhuH (2013a) Numerical and experimental studies on damage detection of a concrete beam based on PZT admittances and correlation coefficient. Construction and Building Materials49: 564–574.
60.
WangFChenZSongG (2020a) Monitoring of multi-bolt connection looseness using entropy-based active sensing and genetic algorithm-based least square support vector machine. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing136: 106507.
61.
WangFHoSCMHuoL, et al. (2018) A novel fractal contact-electromechanical impedance model for quantitative monitoring of bolted joint looseness. IEEE Access6: 40212–40220.
62.
WangFHoSCMSongG (2019) Monitoring of early looseness of multi-bolt connection: A new entropy-based active sensing method without saturation. Smart Materials and Structures28: 10LT01.
63.
WangFSongG (2019) Bolt early looseness monitoring using modified vibro-acoustic modulation by time-reversal. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing130: 349–360.
64.
WangTSongGLiuS, et al. (2013b) Review of bolted connection monitoring. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks9: 871213.
65.
WangTSongGWangZ, et al. (2013c) Proof-of-concept study of monitoring bolt connection status using a piezoelectric based active sensing method. Smart Materials and Structures22: 087001.
66.
WangTTanBLuG, et al. (2020b) Bolt pre-tightening force measurement based on strain distribution of bolt head surface. Journal of Aerospace Engineering33: 04020034.
67.
ZagraiADoyleDGigineishviliV, et al. (2010) Piezoelectric wafer active sensor structural health monitoring of space structures. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures21: 921–940.
68.
ZhangZXuHLiaoY, et al. (2017) Vibro-acoustic modulation (VAM)-inspired structural integrity monitoring and its applications to bolted composite joints. Composite Structures176: 505–515.
