In this paper, the effects of thermal parameters including the deformation temperature, shape recovery temperature, and heating rate on the shape recovery of a specific rounded rectangle structure were investigated using the design of experiments. Three-point bending thermo-mechanical tests were subsequently carried out where water was used for controlling the temperature. It was found that the deformation temperature and heating rate have the most and the least effect on the shape recovery of polylactic acid (PLA) SMPs, respectively. The mathematical modeling results showed that the optimum condition of the highest shape recovery is obtained at the deformation temperature of 53.31°C, recovery temperature of 59.94°C, and heating rate of 8.05°C/min. It was also observed that the shape recovery of the specified rounded rectangle structure manufactured by the 3D printing method was enhanced from 93.03% to 98.14% by optimizing the thermal parameters. Besides, the optimum condition was applied to structures with different cell geometries and it was shown that the obtained condition was also enhanced the shape recovery of structures with diamond and honeycomb. More specifically, the shape recovery of noted structures was significantly enhanced to 98.00% and 97.71 % from 82.86% and 78.89%, respectively.
Abbasi-ShirsavarMBaghaniMTaghavimehrM, et al. (2019) An experimental – numerical study on shape memory behavior of PU/PCL/ZnO ternary blend. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures30(1): 116–126.
2.
AkhoundiBNabipourMHajamiF, et al. (2020) An experimental study of nozzle temperature and heat treatment (annealing) effects on mechanical properties of high-temperature polylactic acid in fused deposition modeling. Polymer Engineering and Science60(5): 979–987.
3.
AkhoundiBNabipourMKordiO, et al. (2021) Calculating printing speed in order to correctly print PLA/continuous glass fiber composites via fused filament fabrication 3D printer. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 089270572199753. doi.org/10.1177/0892705721997534
4.
AnsariMGolzarMBaghaniM, et al. (2018) Shape memory characterization of poly (ε-caprolactone)(PCL)/polyurethane (PU) in combined torsion-tension loading with potential applications in cardiovascular stent. Polymer Testing68: 424–432.
5.
AnsariMGolzarMBaghaniM, et al. (2019) Force recovery evaluation of thermo-induced shape-memory polymer stent: Material, process and thermo-viscoelastic characterization. Smart Materials and Structures28(9): 095022.
6.
ArrietaSDianiJGilorminiP (2014) Experimental characterization and thermoviscoelastic modeling of strain and stress recoveries of an amorphous polymer network. Mechanics of Materials68: 95–103.
7.
BaniasadiMMaleki-BigdeliMABaghaniM (2020a) Force and multiple-shape-recovery in shape-memory-polymers under finite deformation torsion-extension. Smart Materials and Structures29(5): 055011.
8.
BaniasadiMFoyouzatABaghaniM (2020b) Multiple shape memory effect for smart helical springs with variable stiffness over time and temperature. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences182: 105742.
9.
BesseNRossetSZarateJJ, et al. (2017) Flexible active skin: Large reconfigurable arrays of individually addressed shape memory polymer actuators. Advanced Materials Technologies2(10): 1700102.
10.
BilyeuBBrostowWMenardK (2001) Materials Characterization by Dynamic and Modulated Thermal Analytical Techniques, ASTM STP 1402. PA, West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials.
11.
BiswasASinghAPRanaD, et al. (2018) Biodegradable toughened nanohybrid shape memory polymer for smart biomedical applications. Nanoscale10(21): 9917–9934.
12.
ChenGQPatelMK (2012) Plastics derived from biological sources: Present and future: A technical and environmental review. Chemical Reviews112(4): 2082–2099.
13.
DietschBTongT (2007) A review: Features and benefits of shape memory polymers (smps). Journal of Advanced Materials39(2): 3–12.
14.
DingZYuanCPengX, et al. (2017) Direct 4D printing via active composite materials. Science Advances3(4): e1602890.
15.
DoganSKBoyaciogluSKodalM, et al. (2017) Thermally induced shape memory behavior, enzymatic degradation and biocompatibility of PLA/TPU blends: “Effects of compatibilization. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials71: 349–361.
16.
GallKYakackiCMLiuY, et al. (2005) Thermomechanics of the shape memory effect in polymers for biomedical applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 73A(3): 339–348.
17.
GeQSakhaeiAHLeeH, et al. (2016) Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Scientific Reports6(1): 31110.
18.
GladmanASMatsumotoEANuzzoRG, et al. (2016) Biomimetic 4D printing. Nature Materials15(4): 413–418.
19.
González-HenríquezCMSarabia-VallejosMARodriguez-HernandezJ (2019) Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: Materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science94: 57–116.
20.
HavensDEHoodPJHavensTE, et al.; Cornerstone Research Group Inc (2011) Environmental condition cumulative tracking integration sensor using shape memory polymer. U.S. Patent 8,033,237.
21.
HongSSycksDChanHF, et al. (2015) 3D printing: 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Advanced Materials27(27): 4034–4040.
22.
HoodPJHavensDE; Cornerstone Research Group Inc (2006) Structural and optical applications for shape memory polymers (SMP). U.S. Patent 6,986,855.
23.
JebellatEBaniassadiMMoshkiA, et al. (2020) Numerical investigation of smart auxetic three-dimensional meta-structures based on shape memory polymers via topology optimization. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures31(15): 1838–1852.
24.
LasprillaAJRMartinezGARLunelliBH, et al. (2012) Poly-lactic acid synthesis for application in biomedical devices: a review. Biotechnology Advances30(1): 321–328.
25.
LiAChallapalliALiG (2019) 4D printing of recyclable lightweight architectures using high recovery stress shape memory polymer. Scientific Reports9(1): 7621.
26.
LuHYuKLiuY, et al. (2010) Sensing and actuating capabilities of a shape memory polymer composite integrated with hybrid filler. Smart Materials and Structures19(6): 065014.
27.
MaitlandDJLeeAPSchumannDL, et al. (2000) Shape memory polymer (SMP) gripper with a release sensing system. U.S. Patent 6,102,917.
28.
Maleki-BigdeliMABaniassadiMWangK, et al. (2020) Developing a beam formulation for semi-crystalline two-way shape memory polymers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures31(12): 1465–1476.
29.
MengQHuJ (2009) A review of shape memory polymer composites and blends. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing40(11): 1661–1672.
30.
MomeniFM.Mehdi Hassani.NSLiuX, et al. (2017) A review of 4D printing. Materials & Design122: 42–79.
31.
MyersRHMontgomeryDCAnderson-CookCM (2016) Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
NiQQZhangCSFuY, et al. (2007) Shape memory effect and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Composite Structures81(2): 176–184.
RaaschJIveyMAldrichD, et al. (2015) Characterization of polyurethane shape memory polymer processed by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing8: 132–141.
35.
RoudbarianNBaghaniMBaniasadiM, et al. (2019a) An experimental investigation on the energy storage in a shape-memory-polymer system. Energy Equipment and Systems7(4): 309–316.
36.
RoudbarianNBaniasadiMAnsariM, et al. (2019b) An experimental investigation on structural design of shape memory polymers. Smart Materials and Structures28(9): 095017.
37.
SainiPAroraMKumarMNVR (2016) Poly(lactic acid) blends in biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews107: 47–59.
38.
SongJJChangHHNaguibHE (2015) Biocompatible shape memory polymer actuators with high force capabilities. European Polymer Journal67: 186–198.
39.
SunJLiuYLengJ (2015) Mechanical properties of shape memory polymer composites enhanced by elastic fibers and their application in variable stiffness morphing skins. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26(15): 2020–2027.
40.
SunLHuangWM (2010) Thermo/moisture responsive shape-memory polymer for possible surgery/operation inside living cells in future. Materials & Design (1980-2015)31(5): 2684–2689.
41.
TibbitsS (2013) The emergence of “4D printing”. In: TED conference, August.
42.
TobushiHShimadaDHayashiS, et al. (2003) Shape fixity and shape recovery of polyurethane shape-memory polymer foams. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications217(2): 135–143.
43.
TuriE, ed. (1981) Thermal Characterization of Polymeric Materials. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
44.
TylerBGullottiDMangravitiA, et al. (2016) Polylactic acid (PLA) controlled delivery carriers for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews107: 163–175.
45.
WoodwardAE (1966) Relaxation phenomena and polymer structure. Pure and Applied Chemistry12(1-4): 341–358.
46.
WuJYuanCDingZ, et al. (2016) Multi-shape active composites by 3D printing of digital shape memory polymers. Scientific Reports6(1): 24224.
47.
WuWYeWWuZ, et al. (2017) Influence of layer thickness, raster angle, deformation temperature and recovery temperature on the shape-memory effect of 3D-printed polylactic acid samples. Materials10(8): 970.
48.
YaraliETaheriABaghaniM (2020) A comprehensive review on thermomechanical constitutive models for shape memory polymers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures31(10): 1243–1283.
49.
YuKGeQQiHJ (2014) Reduced time as a unified parameter determining fixity and free recovery of shape memory polymers. Nature Communications5(1): 3066.
50.
ZhaoQQiHJXieT (2015) Recent progress in shape memory polymer: New behavior, enabling materials, and mechanistic understanding. Progress in Polymer Science 49–50: 79–120.
