The extremely useful superelastic behavior of NiTi has been poorly explored because of the limited number of models that can describe the complete hysteretic behavior of NiTi, including a superelastic condition that strongly depends on the applied stress. This paper presents the development of a stress-dependent phenomenological model of NiTi by modifying the existing generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii (GPI) model. The parameters of the envelop function of the GPI model’s play operator are reformulated as quadratic functions of the applied stress. The stress-dependent GPI model can satisfactorily predict the output strain of a NiTi #6 wire under temperature and stress variation.
AhnKKKhaNB (2007) Internal model control for shape memory alloy actuators using fuzzy based preisach model. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical136(2): 730–741.
2.
AhnKKKhaNB (2008) Modeling and control of shape memory alloy actuators using preisach model, genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic. Mechatronics18(3): 141–152.
3.
Al JanaidehMFengYRakhejaS, et al. (2009) Generalized prandtl–ishlinskii hysteresis: Modeling and robust control for smart actuators. In: Proceedings of the 48th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2009 held jointly with the 2009 28th Chinese control conference 2009, pp.7279–7284.
4.
Al JanaidehMSuCYRakhejaS (2008) Development of the rate-dependent prandtl–ishlinskii model for smart actuators. Smart Materials and Structures17(3): 1–11.
5.
AuricchioFSaccoE (1997) A superelastic shape-memory-alloy beam model. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures8(6): 489–501.
6.
BasaeriHZakerzadehMYousefikomaA, et al. (2019) Hysteresis modeling, identification and fuzzy pid control of sma wire actuators using generalized prandtl–ishlinskii model with experimental validation. Journal of Computational Applied Mechanics50(2): 263–274.
7.
BoydJGLagoudasDC (1994) Thermomechanical response of shape memory composites. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures5(3): 333–346.
8.
BuehlerWJWileyRC (1965) Nickel-base alloys. US Patent 3,174,851.
9.
ChengSSKimYDesaiJP (2017) Modeling and characterization of shape memory alloy springs with water cooling strategy in a neurosurgical robot. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures28(16): 2167–2183.
10.
DargahiARakhejaSSedaghatiR (2019) Development of a field dependent prandtl–ishlinskii model for magnetorheological elastomers. Materials & Design166: 107608.
11.
De BlonkBJLagoudasDC (1998) Actuation of elastomeric rods with embedded two-way shape memory alloy actuators. Smart Materials and Structures7(6): 771–783.
12.
DengMJiangCInoueA, et al. (2011) Operator-based robust control for nonlinear systems with prandtl–ishlinskii hysteresis. International Journal of Systems Science42(4): 643–652.
13.
FalvoAFurgiueleFMalettaC (2007) Two-way shape memory effect of a ti rich niti alloy: Experimental measurements and numerical simulations. Smart Materials and Structures16(3): 771–778.
14.
FengYLiZRakhejaS, et al. (2018) A modified prandtl–ishlinskii hysteresis modeling method with load-dependent delay for characterizing magnetostrictive actuated systems. Mechanical Sciences9(1): 177.
15.
GorbetRWangDMorrisK (1998) Preisach model identification of a two-wire sma actuator. In: Proceedings 1998 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol. 3. pp.2161–2167.
16.
HamiltonRSehitogluHChumlyakovY, et al. (2004) Stress dependence of the hysteresis in single crystal niti alloys. Acta Materialia52(11): 3383–3402.
17.
IvshinYPenceTJ (1994) A thermomechanical model for a one variant shape memory material. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures5(4): 455–473.
18.
JanaidehMAMaoJRakhejaS, et al. (2008) Generalized prandtl–ishlinskii hysteresis model: Hysteresis modeling and its inverse for compensation in smart actuators. In: 2008 47th IEEE conference on decision and control. IEEE, pp.5182–5187.
19.
JaniJMLearyMSubicA, et al. (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Materials & Design56: 1078–1113.
20.
KhanMMLagoudasDC (2002) Modeling of shape memory alloy pseudoelastic spring elements using preisach model for passive vibration isolation. In: SPIE’s 9th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp.336–347.
21.
KleinOKrejči P (2003) Outwards pointing hysteresis operators and asymptotic behaviour of evolution equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications4(5): 755–785.
22.
KolyvasETzesA (2018) Model based design of antagonistic shape memory alloy spring devices. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29(12): 2619–2640.
23.
Levintant-ZayontsNStarzynskiGKopecM, et al. (2019) Characterization of niti sma in its unusual behaviour in wear tests. Tribology International137: 313–323.
24.
LiCZhouZZhuY (2019) A uniaxial constitutive model for niti shape memory alloy bars considering the effect of residual strain. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures30(8): 1163–1177.
25.
LiuSSuCY (2011) A note on the properties of a generalized prandtl–ishlinskii model. Smart Materials and Structures20(8): 087003.
26.
LiuSLiZSuCY (2012) Robust adaptive control of a class of nonlinear system with an asymmetric shifted prandtl–ishlinskii hysteresis model. In: International conference on advanced mechatronic systems (ICAMechS), 2012. IEEE, pp.217–222.
27.
MosleyMJMavroidisC (2001) Experimental nonlinear dynamics of a shape memory alloy wire bundle actuator. Transactions – American Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control123(1): 103–112.
28.
MüllerI (1979) A model for a body with shape-memory. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis70(1): 61–77.
29.
MüllerIWilmanskiK (1980) A model for phase transition in pseudoelastic bodies. Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 1157(2): 283–318.
30.
NguyenBKAhnKK (2009) Feedforward control of shape memory alloy actuators using fuzzy-based inverse preisach model. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology17(2): 434–441.
31.
Owusu-DanquahJSSaleebAF (2017) Detwinning of preloaded martensite in shape memory alloys and its effect on the cyclic behavior of niti cylindrical actuators. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures28(19): 2835–2852.
32.
PaivaASaviMA (2006) An overview of constitutive models for shape memory alloys. Mathematical Problems in Engineering2006; 56876: 1–30.
33.
RiccardiLNasoDJanochaH, et al. (2012) A precise positioning actuator based on feedback-controlled magnetic shape memory alloys. Mechatronics22(5): 568–576.
34.
SayyaadiHZakerzadehMR (2012) Position control of shape memory alloy actuator based on the generalized prandtl–ishlinskii inverse model. Mechatronics22(7): 945–957.
35.
SayyaadiHZakerzadehMRZanjaniMAV (2011) Accuracy evaluation of generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model in characterizing asymmetric saturated hysteresis nonlinearity behavior of shape memory alloy actuators. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Mechatronic Design and Simulation (IJRRMDS)1: 59–68.
36.
ShakibaSYousefi-KomaAJokarM, et al. (2019) Modeling and characterization of the shape memory alloy-based morphing wing behavior using proposed rate-dependent prandtl–ishlinskii models. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering234(4): 550–565.
37.
SongGChaudhryVBaturC (2003a) A neural network inverse model for a shape memory alloy wire actuator. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures14(6): 371–377.
38.
SongGChaudhryVBaturC (2003b) Precision tracking control of shape memory alloy actuators using neural networks and a sliding-mode based robust controller. Smart Materials and Structures12(2): 223–231.
39.
TanakaKIwasakiR (1985) A phenomenological theory of transformation superplasticity. Engineering Fracture Mechanics21(4): 709–720.
40.
TanakaKNagakiS (1982) A thermomechanical description of materials with internal variables in the process of phase transitions. Ingenieur-Archiv51(5): 287–299.
41.
Van VietNZakiWUmerR (2018) Analytical model for a superelastic timoshenko shape memory alloy beam subjected to a loading–unloading cycle. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29(20): 3902–3922.
42.
Van VietNZakiWMoumniZ (2019) A model for shape memory alloy beams accounting for tensile compressive asymmetry. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures30(18–19): 2697–2715.
43.
VisintinA (2013) Differential models of hysteresis, vol. 111. Springer Science & Business Media.
44.
WangYFSuCYHongH, et al. (2007) Modeling and compensation for hysteresis of shape memory alloy actuators with the preisach representation. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on control and automation, pp.239–244.
45.
WebbGVLagoudasDCKurdilaAJ (1998) Hysteresis modeling of sma actuators for control applications. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures9(6): 432–448.
46.
WebbGKurdilaALagoudasD (2000a) Adaptive hysteresis model for model reference control with actuator hysteresis. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics23(3): 459–465.
47.
WebbGWilsonLLagoudasD, et al. (2000b) Adaptive control of shape memory alloy actuators for underwater biomimetic applications. AIAA Journal38(2): 325–334.
48.
XiaoYZengPLeiL (2019) A microstructure-based constitutive model accounting for rate dependence of superelastic niti alloy under cyclic deformation. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures .
49.
ZakerzadehMSayyaadiHZanjaniMV (2011) Characterizing hysteresis nonlinearity behavior of sma actuators by krasnosel’skii-pokrovskii model. Applied Mathematics1(1): 28–38.
50.
ZakerzadehMRSayyaadiH (2012) Experimental comparison of some phenomenological hysteresis models in characterizing hysteresis behavior of shape memory alloy actuators. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures23(12): 1287–1309.
51.
ZakerzadehMRSayyaadiH (2014) Deflection control of sma-actuated beam-like structures in nonlinear large deformation mode. American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics4(5): 167–185.
52.
ZhangZMaoJChenW (2008) Stress-dependent hysteresis modeling and tracking control of giant magnetostrictive actuator for periodic reference input. IFAC Proceedings Volumes41(2): 2288–2293.
53.
ZhangZMaoJZhouK (2013) Experimental characterization and modeling of stress-dependent hysteresis of a giant magnetostrictive actuator. Science China Technological Sciences56(3): 656–665.
54.
ZhouMWangSGaoW (2013) Hysteresis modeling of magnetic shape memory alloy actuator based on krasnosel’skii-pokrovskii model. The Scientific World Journal 2013. Article ID 865176, 1–7.
55.
ZhouMZhangQWangJ (2014) Feedforward-feedback hybrid control for magnetic shape memory alloy actuators based on the krasnosel’skii–pokrovskii model. PloS One9(5): e97086.
