Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2019-9
On the manufacturing,integration,and wiring techniques of in situ piezoelectric devices for the manufacturing and structural health monitoring of polymer–matrix composites: A literature review
This article aims to provide a general overview on what has been achieved recently in the scientific community on the manufacturing, embedding, and wiring techniques of various kinds of piezoelectric devices for manufacturing monitoring and structural health monitoring applications of polymer–matrix composites.
AtasASoutisC (2013) Subcritical damage mechanisms of bolted joints in CFRP composite laminates. Composites Part B: Engineering54: 20–27.
2.
BadcockRABirtEA (1998) The use of 0-3 piezocomposite embedded Lamb wave sensors for damage detection in advanced fibre composites. In: Smart Materials and Structures: Proceedings of the 4th European and 2nd MIMR Conference (eds TomlinsonGRBulloughWA), Harrogate, pp. 373–380. IOP Publishing.
3.
BaeJHChangSH (2015) Characterization of an electroactive polymer (PVDF-TrFE) film-type sensor for health monitoring of composite structures. Composite Structures131: 1090–1098.
4.
BaeJHLeeSWChangSH (2018) Characterization of low-velocity impact-induced damages in carbon/epoxy composite laminates using a poly(vinylidene fluoride–trifluoroethylene) film sensor. Composites Part B: Engineering135: 189–200.
5.
BarnesRAthertonDL (1993) Effects of bending stresses on magnetic flux leakage patterns. NDT & E International26(1): 3–6.
6.
BellanFBullettiACapineriL, et al. (2005) A new design and manufacturing process for embedded Lamb waves interdigital transducers based on piezopolymer film. Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical 123–124: 379–387.
7.
BlanasPDas-GuptaDK (1999) Composite piezoelectric sensors for smart composite structures. In: IEEE 10th international symposium on electrets, pp. 4–7. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/832148
BoccardiSCarlomagnoGMMeolaC, et al. (2017) Evaluation of polypropylene based composites from thermal effects developing under cyclic bending tests. Composite Structures182: 628–635.
10.
CanevaCDe RosaIMSarasiniF (2008) Monitoring of impacted aramid-reinforced composites by embedded PVDF acoustic emission sensors. Strain44(4): 308–316.
CastaingsMHostenB (2008) Ultrasonic guided waves for health monitoring of high-pressure composite tanks. NDT & E International41(8): 648–655.
13.
ChenXMeyerYLachatR, et al. (2017a) Laminates with integrated piezoelectric transducers: influence of the transducers location along the thickness-axis on the structural performance. In: 8th conference on smart structures and materials, SMART 2017 and 6th international conference on smart materials and nanotechnology in engineering, Madrid25–27 April.
14.
ChenXMeyerYLachatR, et al. (2017b) Structural health monitoring of a smart composite structure with a Time-of-Flight method. In: MEDYNA 2017: 2nd Euro-Mediterranean conference on structural dynamics and vibroacoustics, Sevilla, pp. 25–28. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02131285
15.
ChillesJSKoutsomitopoulouAFCroxfordAJ, et al. (2016) Monitoring cure and detecting damage in composites with inductively coupled embedded sensors. Composites Science and Technology134: 81–88.
16.
ChrysochoidisNAGutiérrezE (2015) Evaluation of the sensitivity and fatigue performance of embedded piezopolymer sensor systems in sandwich composite laminates. Smart Materials and Structures24(2). DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025032.
17.
CrastoASKimRYRussellJD (2002) In situ monitoring of residual strain development during composite cure. Polymer Composites23: 454–463.
18.
De RosaIMSarasiniF (2010) Use of PVDF as acoustic emission sensor for in situ monitoring of mechanical behaviour of glass/epoxy laminates. Polymer Testing29(6): 749–758.
19.
DjemanaMHrairiM (2016) Impedance based detection of delamination in composite structures. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering755: 011001.
20.
DongJLocquetADeclercqNF, et al. (2016) Polarization-resolved terahertz imaging of intra- and inter-laminar damages in hybrid fiber-reinforced composite laminate subject to low-velocity impact. Composites Part B: Engineering92: 167–174.
21.
DziendzikowskiMDraganKKatuninA (2017) Localizing impact damage of composite structures with modified RAPID algorithm and non-circular PZT arrays. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering17(1): 178–187.
22.
DziendzikowskiMKurnytaADraganK, et al. (2016) In situ barely visible impact damage detection and localization for composite structures using surface mounted and embedded PZT transducers: a comparative study. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing78: 91–106.
23.
DziendzikowskiMNiedbalaPKurnytaA, et al. (2018) Structural health monitoring of a composite panel based on PZT sensors and a transfer impedance framework. Sensors18(5): 1521.
24.
FoulonA (2016) Détermination de la signature acoustique de la corrosion des composites SVR (stratifiés verre résine). Université de Technologie de Compiègne. Available at: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01333278
25.
GellerSTyczynskiTGudeM (2016) Studies on the characterization of novel piezoelectric sensor elements, integrated in glass fibre-reinforced polyurethane composites. Procedia Engineering168: 868–871.
26.
Ghasemi-NejhadMNRussRPourjalaliS (2005) Manufacturing and testing of active composite panels with embedded piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures16(4): 319–333.
27.
GhodhbaniNMarechalPDufloH (2015) Ultrasonic broadband characterization of a viscous liquid: methods and perturbation factors. Ultrasonics56: 308–317.
28.
GhodhbaniNMaréchalPDufloH (2016) Ultrasound monitoring of the cure kinetics of an epoxy resin: identification, frequency and temperature dependence. Polymer Testing56: 156–166.
29.
GhoshalAAyersJGurvichM, et al. (2015) Experimental investigations in embedded sensing of composite components in aerospace vehicles. Composites Part B: Engineering71: 52–62.
30.
GuzmanECugnoniJGmürT (2014) A new structural health monitoring (SHM) system using an integrated PVDF transducer network. In: Proceedings of the 65th international astronautical congress, Toronto, ON, Canada, 29 September – 3 October.
31.
GuzmanECugnoniJGmürT, et al. (2013) Survivability of integrated PVDF film sensors to accelerated ageing conditions in aeronautical/aerospace structures. Smart Materials and Structures22(6). DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/6/065020.
32.
HaghiashtianiGGremingerMA (2015) Fabrication, polarization, and characterization of PVDF matrix composites for integrated structural load sensing. Smart Materials and Structures24(4): 45038. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/4/045038.
33.
HamdiKAbouraZHariziW, et al. (2017) Improvement of the electrical conductivity of carbon fiber reinforced polymer by incorporation of nanofillers and the resulting thermal and mechanical behavior. Journal of Composite Materials52: 1495–1503.
34.
HariziWChakiSBourseG, et al. (2014) Mechanical damage assessment of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites using passive infrared thermography. Composites Part B: Engineering59: 74–79.
35.
HariziWChakiSBourseG, et al. (2015) Mechanical damage characterization of glass fiber-reinforced polymer laminates by ultrasonic maps. Composites Part B: Engineering70: 131–137.
36.
HaywoodJCoverleyPTStaszewskiWJ, et al. (2005) An automatic impact monitor for a composite panel employing smart sensor technology. Smart Materials and Structures14(1): 265–271.
37.
HufenbachWBöhmRThiemeM, et al. (2011) Damage monitoring in pressure vessels and pipelines based on wireless sensor networks. Procedia Engineering10: 340–345.
38.
HuguetS (2002) Application de classificateurs aux données d’émission acoustique : identification de la signature acoustique des mécanismes d’endommagement dans les composites à matrice polymère. PhD Thesis, INSA, Lyon.
39.
HuguetSGodinNGaertnerR, et al. (2002) Use of acoustic emission to identify damage modes in glass fibre reinforced polyester. Composites Science and Technology62: 1433–1444.
KatuninADraganKDziendzikowskiM (2015) Damage identification in aircraft composite structures: a case study using various non-destructive testing techniques. Composite Structures127: 1–9.
42.
KlineRParasnisNKonanurR (1992) Ultrasonic monitoring of the dynamic properties of composites during manufacture. In: Ultrasonics symposium. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/275865
KonkaHPWahabMALianK (2012a) On mechanical properties of composite sandwich structures with embedded piezoelectric fiber composite sensors. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology134: 011010.
45.
KonkaHPWahabMALianK (2012b) The effects of embedded piezoelectric fiber composite sensors on the structural integrity of glass-fiber-epoxy composite laminate. Smart Materials and Structures21(1). DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/21/1/015016.
46.
KonkaHPWahabMALianK (2013) Piezoelectric fiber composite transducers for health monitoring in composite structures. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical194: 84–94.
47.
KoyamaKHoshikawaHKojimaG (2013) Eddy current nondestructive testing for carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology135(4): 041501.
48.
KumarSMahtoD (2013) Recent trends in industrial and other engineering applications of non destructive testing: a review. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research4(9): 183–195.
49.
KwonOLeeS (1999) Acousto-ultrasonic evaluation of adhesively bonded CFRP-aluminum joints. NDT & E International32: 153–160.
50.
LachatRMeyerY (2017) Method for producing a part made of a composite material, incorporating components and marking means, Genève, Switzerland, WO 2017/013346 A1. Organisation Mondiale de la Propriété Intellectuelle.
51.
LeeCW (1991) Monitoring of epoxy/graphite composites using a scaling analysis and a dual heat flux sensor on-line cure. Journal of Composite Materials26: 274–292.
52.
LinMChangF-K (1999) Composite structures with built-in diagnostics. Materials Today2(2): 18–22.
53.
LinMChangFK (2002) The manufacture of composite structures with a built-in network of piezoceramics. Composites Science and Technology62(7–8): 919–939.
54.
LinMQingXKumarA, et al. (2001) Smart layer and smart suitcase for structural health monitoring applications. In: Proc. SPIE (ed. A-MRMcGowan), 14June, pp. 98–106. DOI: 10.1117/12.429646.
55.
LinYSodanoHA (2008) Concept and model of a piezoelectric structural fiber for multifunctional composites. Composites Science and Technology69(11–12): 1825–1830.
56.
LinYSodanoHA (2009) Fabrication and electromechanical characterization of a piezoelectric structural fiber for multifunctional composites. Advanced Functional Materials19(4): 592–598.
57.
LuSChenDWangX, et al. (2017) Real-time cure behaviour monitoring of polymer composites using a highly flexible and sensitive CNT buckypaper sensor. Composites Science and Technology152: 181–189.
58.
MarecAThomasJHEl GuerjoumaR (2008) Damage characterization of polymer-based composite materials: multivariable analysis and wavelet transform for clustering acoustic emission data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing22(6): 1441–1464.
59.
MarinERobertLTriolletS, et al. (2012) Liquid resin infusion process monitoring with superimposed Fibre Bragg Grating sensor. Polymer Testing31(8): 1045–1052.
60.
MartinsATAbouraZHariziW, et al. (2018) Structural health monitoring for GFRP composite by the piezoresistive response in the tufted reinforcements. Composite Structures209: 103–111.
61.
MartinsPLopesACLanceros-MendezS (2014) Electroactive phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride): determination, processing and applications. Progress in Polymer Science39: 683–706.
MasmoudiSEl MahiAEl GuerjoumaR (2014a) Mechanical behaviour and health monitoring by acoustic emission of sandwich composite integrated by piezoelectric implant. Composites Part B: Engineering67: 76–83.
64.
MasmoudiSEl MahiATurkiS (2015a) Use of piezoelectric as acoustic emission sensor for in situ monitoring of composite structures. Composites Part B: Engineering80: 307–320.
65.
MasmoudiSEl MahiATurkiS (2016) Fatigue behaviour and structural health monitoring by acoustic emission of E-glass/epoxy laminates with piezoelectric implant. Applied Acoustics108: 50–58.
66.
MasmoudiSEl MahiATurkiS (2017) Effect of piezoelectric implant on the structural integrity of composite laminates subjected to tensile loads. Applied Composite Materials24: 39–54.
67.
MasmoudiSEl MahiAEl GuerjoumaR, et al. (2014b) Mechanical behaviour and identification of damage by acoustic emission of smart composites. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures10(1): 2–17.
68.
MasmoudiSEl MahiATurkiS, et al. (2014c) Mechanical behavior and health monitoring by Acoustic Emission of unidirectional and cross-ply laminates integrated by piezoelectric implant. Applied Acoustics86: 118–125.
69.
MasmoudiSEl MahiATurkiS, et al. (2015b) Structural integrity of laminated composite with embedded piezoelectric sensors. In: ChouchaneMFakhfakhTDalyHetal. (eds) Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems, Vol. II (Lecture notes in mechanical engineering). Cham: Springer, pp. 673–680. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17527-0.
MelnykowyczMBelloliAErmanniP, et al. (2006) Integration and reliability of active fiber composite (AFC) sensors/actuators in carbon/epoxy laminates. In: Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Active Materials: Behavior and Mechanics, vol. 6170. Available at: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/6170.toc?SSO=1
72.
MeolaCCarlomagnoGMSquillaceA, et al. (2006) Non-destructive evaluation of aerospace materials with lock-in thermography. Engineering Failure Analysis13(3): 380–388.
NonnSSchagerlMZhaoY, et al. (2018) Application of electrical impedance tomography to an anisotropic carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite laminate for damage localization. Composites Science and Technology160: 231–236.
77.
ParkJMKongJWKimDS, et al. (2005) Nondestructive damage detection and interfacial evaluation of single-fibers/epoxy composites using PZT, PVDF and P(VDF-TrFE) copolymer sensors. Composites Science and Technology65(2): 241–256.
78.
ParlevlietPPBerseeHENBeukersA (2010) Measurement of (post-)curing strain development with fibre Bragg gratings. Polymer Testing29(3): 291–301.
79.
PegorinFPingkarawatKMouritzAP (2017) Electrical-based delamination crack monitoring in composites using z-pins. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing104: 120–128.
QingXPBeardSJKumarA, et al. (2006) Advances in the development of built-in diagnostic system for filament wound composite structures. Composites Science and Technology66: 1694–1702.
82.
QingXPBeardSJKumarA, et al. (2007) Built-in sensor network for structural health monitoring of composite structure. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures18(1): 39–49.
83.
RothWGiurgiutiuV (2017) Structural health monitoring of an adhesive disbond through electromechanical impedance spectroscopy. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives73: 109–117.
84.
RoundySWrightPK (2004) A piezoelectric vibration based generator for wireless electronics. Smart Materials and Structures13(5). DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/018.
85.
Saint-PierreNPerrissin-FabertIJayetY, et al. (1996) Monitoring the hydrolytic degradation of polyester-based composites by a piezoelectric method. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites15: 663–672.
86.
SametNMaréchalPDufloH (2011) Ultrasound monitoring of bubble size and velocity in a fluid model using phased array transducer. NDT & E International44(7): 621–627.
87.
SametNMaréchalPDufloH (2012) Ultrasonic characterization of a fluid layer using a broadband transducer. Ultrasonics52(3): 427–434.
88.
SametNMarechalPDufloH (2015) Monitoring of an ascending air bubble in a viscous fluid/fiber matrix medium using a phased array transducer. European Journal of Mechanics, B/fluids54: 45–52.
89.
ScheererMCardoneTRapisardaA, et al. (2012) Online damage detection on metal and composite space structures by active and passive acoustic methods. Available at: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ESASP.691E.164S
90.
SchulzeRStreitPFischerT, et al. (2014) Fiber-reinforced composite structures with embedded piezoelectric sensors. IEEE Sensors2014: 6–9.
91.
ShinSZamoranoBElvinN (2016) Comparison of the electromechanical properties of embedded and surface-mounted piezoelectric transducers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures27(20): 2837–2850.
92.
SuZWangXChenZ, et al. (2006) A built-in active sensor network for health monitoring of composite structures. Smart Materials and Structures15(6): 1939–1949.
93.
TanKTWatanabeNIwahoriY (2011) X-ray radiography and micro-computed tomography examination of damage characteristics in stitched composites subjected to impact loading. Composites Part B: Engineering42(4): 874–884.
94.
TodorokiATanakaY (2002) Delamination identification of cross-ply graphite/epoxy composite beams using electric resistance change method. Composites Science and Technology62: 629–639.
95.
UssorioMWangHOginSL, et al. (2006) Modifications to FBG sensor spectra due to matrix cracking in a GFRP composite. Construction and Building Materials20(1–2): 111–118.
WengerMPBlanasPShufordRJ, et al. (1999) Characterization and evaluation of piezoelectric composite bimorphs for in-situ acoustic emission sensors. Polymer Engineering & Science39(3): 508–518.
98.
WinklerADannemannMStarkeE, et al. (2015) Manufacturing and characterisation of fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composite structures with embedded piezoelectric sensor-actuator-arrays for ultrasonic applications. In: 6th international conference on emerging technologies in non destructive testing, Brussels, 27–29 May.
99.
YangSKimKGeunH, et al. (2013) Non-contact detection of impact damage in CFRP composites using millimeter-wave reflection and considering carbon fiber direction. NDT & E International57: 45–51.
100.
YuLGiurgiutiuV (2008) In situ 2-D piezoelectric wafer active sensors arrays for guided wave damage detection. Ultrasonics48(2): 117–134.
101.
YuLBottai-SantoniGGiurgiutiuV (2010) Shear lag solution for tuning ultrasonic piezoelectric wafer active sensors with applications to Lamb wave array imaging. International Journal of Engineering Science48(10): 848–861.
