The split drag rudder is an important yawing control device for the tailless flying-wing aircraft. In this article, a new morphing drag rudder is proposed based on the chordwise continuous variable camber technology. The designs of the structure and actuation system are first presented. A comparative study on the aerodynamics of the morphing and traditional drag rudders is performed numerically. The results show that the morphing drag rudder experiences a larger aerodynamic drag than the traditional one at small angles of attack. The analysis on the structural deformation and the required actuating moment at zero angle of attack are performed. The results show that the deformation due to the aerodynamic load increases more and more slowly with the angle of deflection. Besides, the relationship between the required actuating moment and the trailing edge deformation is linear, which indicates the applicability of using morphing drag rudder for yawing control.
BaeJSSeiglerTMInmanDJet al. (2004) Aerodynamic and aeroelastic considerations of a variable-span morphing wing. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, 19–22 April, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
2.
BarbarinoSBilgenOAjajRMet al. (2011) A review of morphing aircraft. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures22(9): 823–877.
3.
BarbarinoSLecceLConcilioAet al. (2009) Wing shape control through an SMA-based device. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures20(3): 283–296.
4.
FengLWangJYuD (2010) Lateral-directional control of tailless aircraft with multiple control surfaces. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics36(9): 1038–1042.
5.
GongJZhuXTaoY (2010) Split drag rudder hinge moment predict for flying wing aircraft. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica28(4): 472–477.
6.
GregoryNReillyCL (1970) Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 aerofoil sections, including the effects of upper-surface roughness simulation hoar frost. Cheminform23(48): 6697–6700.
7.
HanPWuZYangC (2014) Effect of different split angles on flutter velocity of split drag rudder. Aeronautical Science and Technology25(10): 26–32.
8.
HongWMaD (2016) Influence of control coupling effect on landing performance of flying wing aircraft. Applied Mechanics and Materials829: 110–117.
9.
HuWYangZGuY (2015) Aeroelastic study for folding wing during the morphing process. Journal of Sound and Vibration365: 216–229.
10.
LiDGuoSXiangJ (2013) Modeling and nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of a wing with morphing trailing edge. Journal of Aerospace Engineering: Part G227(4): 619–631.
11.
LiDGuoSHeYet al. (2012) Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of morphing flap. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos22(5): 1250099.
12.
LiLMaCWangL (2007) Lateral-directional control characteristics of high aspect-ratio flying wing configurations. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Available at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-BJHK200710015.htm
13.
LiZMaD (2014a) Control characteristics analysis of drag yawing control devices of flying wing configuration. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics40(5): 695–700.
14.
LiZMaD (2014b) Control characteristics analysis of split-drag-rudder. Applied Mechanics and Materials472: 185–190.
15.
LiuGQiuYChenHet al. (2003) Investigation of the direction control for the tailless aircraft configuration. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics17(4): 1–9.
16.
MaSWuCChenH (2008) The application of drag rudder to flight control of tailless aircraft. Flight Dynamics26(2): 69–73.
17.
MohamadFWisnoeWNasirREMet al. (2012) A study about the split drag flaps deflections to directional motion of UiTM’s blended wing body aircraft based on computational fluid dynamics simulation. In: Proceedings of 4th international meeting of advances in thermofluids, Melaka, Malaysia, 3–4 October, pp. 324–329. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
18.
NickelKWohlfahrtM (1994) Tailless Aircraft in Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: AIAA Education Series.
19.
OlympioKRGandhiF (2010) Flexible skins for morphing aircraft using Cellular Honeycomb Cores. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures21(17): 1719–1735.
20.
PankonienAMFariaCTInmanDJ (2015) Synergistic smart morphing aileron: experimental quasi-static performance characterization. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26(10): 1179–1190.
21.
QuXZhangWShiJ (2016) Control allocation method for split-drag-rudders with asymmetrical deflection. Journal of System Simulation28(3): 627–639.
RajputJZhangWQuX (2014) A differential configuration of split drag-rudders with variable bias for directional control of flying-wing. Applied Mechanics and Materials643: 54–59.
24.
StenfeltGRingertzU (2009) Lateral stability and control of a tailless aircraft configuration. Journal of Aircraft46(6): 2161–2164.
25.
StenfeltGRingertzU (2010) Yaw control of a tailless aircraft configuration. Journal of Aircraft47: 1807–1811.
26.
SunJGuanQLiuYet al. (2016) Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures27(17): 2289–2312.
WangLWangLJiaZ (2011) Control features and application characteristics of split drag rudder utilized by flying wing. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica32(8): 1392–1399.
29.
WangQLiQChengNet al. (2014) Counteracting crosswind control method for flying-wing UAV without sideslip sensors. Journal of Tsinghua University54(4): 530–535.
30.
WangRZhuXZhouZet al. (2008) Exploring utilization of drag rudder in stability and control of flying wing high altitude long endurance UAV. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University26(6): 673–677.
31.
WangXYuCSuXet al. (2013) Study of control characteristics for split rudder in variable forward swept wing configuration. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica34(4): 741–749.
32.
WeisshaarTA (2013) Morphing aircraft systems: historical perspectives and future challenges. Journal of Aircraft50(2): 337–353.
33.
WildschekAHavarTPlötnerK (2010) An all-composite, all-electric, morphing trailing edge device for flight control on a blended-wing-body airliner. Journal of Aerospace Engineering224(1): 1–9.
34.
WoodsBKSBilgenBilgenOFriswellMI (2014) Wind tunnel testing of the fish bone active camber morphing concept. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures25(7): 772–785.
35.
WoodsBKSDayyaniIFriswellMI (2015) Fluid/structure-interaction analysis of the fish-bone-active-camber morphing concept. Journal of Aircraft52(1): 307–319.
36.
ZhangZLiJLiTet al. (2010) Experimental investigation of split rudder deflection on aerodynamic performance of tailless flying-wing aircraft. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics24(3): 63–66.
37.
ZuoLWangJ (2010) Experimental study of the effect of All-Moving wingtip on aerodynamic performance of tailless flying wing aircraft. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica28(2): 132–137.
