An experimental and computational comparison of the structural and electromechanical coupling properties of composite beams with surface-mounted and embedded piezoelectric disks shows that the embedded sensors tend to have higher electromechanical coupling coefficients due to improved strain transfer between the transducer and host material. Experimental testing of fiber–epoxy composite beams with embedded and surface-mounted piezoelectric disks under quasi-static three-point bending tests shows that bending elastic moduli and ultimate stresses are not significantly different between these two cases, while ultimate strains are greater for the surface-mounted cases compared with the embedded cases. Electromechanical coupling decreases with increasing bending loads due to either debonding between the sensor and host structure or due to damage of the brittle piezoelectric material. Embedded sensors tend to show a smaller degradation in electromechanical coupling with increasing stress level.
AntonSRErturkAInmanDJ (2012) Bending strength of piezoelectric ceramics and single crystals for multifunctional load-bearing applications. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control59: 1085–1092.
2.
ArellanoMTCrouzeixLCollombetF. (2012) Mechanical characterization of an alternative technique to embed sensors in composite structures: the monitoring patch. Applied Composite Materials19: 379–391.
CivjanSMargetisPMReddickRL (1969) Properties of n-butyl-α-cyanoacrylate mixtures. Journal of Dental Research48: 536–542.
5.
CrawleyEFDe LuisJHagoodN. (1988) Development of piezoelectric technology for applications in control of intelligent structures. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, 1988, Atlanta, GA, 15–17 June, pp. 1890–1896. New York: IEEE.
6.
DasguptaAWanYSirkisJ (1992) Prediction of resin pocket geometry for stress analysis of optical fibers embedded in laminated composites. Smart Materials and Structures1: 101–107.
7.
DelaleFErdoganFAydinogluM (1981) Stresses in adhesively bonded joints: a closed-form solution. Journal of Composite Materials15: 249–271.
ErturkA (2011) Piezoelectric energy harvesting for civil infrastructure system applications: moving loads and surface strain fluctuations. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures22(17): 1959–1973.
10.
ErturkAInmanDJ (2009) An experimentally validated bimorph cantilever model for piezoelectric energy harvesting from base excitations. Smart Materials and Structures18(2): 025009.
11.
ErturkAInmanDJ (2011) Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
Ghasemi-NejhadMNRussRPourjalaliS (2005) Manufacturing and testing of active composite panels with embedded piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures16: 319–333.
13.
GiurgiutiuVZagraiABaoJJ. (2002) Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring1.1: 41–61.
14.
GuillonOThiebaudFDelobelleP. (2004) Tensile behavior of PZT in short and open-circuit conditions. Materials Letters58: 986–990.
15.
HansenJPVizziniAJ (2000) Fatigue response of a host structure with interlaced embedded devices. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures11: 902–909.
16.
HeslehurstRB (2013) Design and Analysis of Structural Joints with Composite Materials. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications, Inc.
17.
HuangYNemat-NasserS (2007) Structural integrity of composite laminates with embedded micro-sensors. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on, smart structures and materials and nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring, pp. 65300W-1–65300W-6. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, April 2007.
18.
IslamMHuangH (2014) Understanding the effects of adhesive layer on the electromechanical impedance (EMI) of bonded piezoelectric wafer transducer. Smart Materials and Structures23: 125037.
19.
KimJSwansonSR (2001) Design of sandwich structures for concentrated loading. Composite Structures52: 365–373.
20.
LinMChangF-K (2002) The manufacture of composite structures with a built-in network of piezoceramics. Composites Science and Technology62: 919–939.
21.
LinMQingXKumarA. (2001) SMART layer and SMART suitcase for structural health monitoring applications. In: Proceedings of the SPIE’s 8th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials, Newport Beach, CA, 4 March, pp. 98–106. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
22.
MaKGhasemi-NejhadMN (2004) Frequency-weighted adaptive control for simultaneous precision positioning and vibration suppression of smart structures. Smart Materials and Structures13: 1143.
23.
MallSColemanJ (1998) Monotonic and fatigue loading behavior of quasi-isotropic graphite/epoxy laminate embedded with piezoelectric sensor. Smart Materials and Structures7: 822.
24.
PagetC (2001) Active health monitoring of aerospace composite structures by embedded piezoceramic transducers. PhD dissertation, Department of Aeronautics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
25.
PagetCALevinK (1999) Structural integrity of composites with embedded piezoelectric ceramic transducers. In: Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on smart structures and materials, Newport Beach, CA, 1 March, pp. 306–313. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
26.
PreumontA (2011) Vibration Control of Active Structures: An Introduction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
27.
RobertsSSDavidsonR (1991) Mechanical properties of composite materials containing embedded fiber-optic sensors. In: Proceedings of the OE fiber-DL tentative, Boston, MA, 1 September, pp. 326–341. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
28.
SalaGOlivierM (2004) Embedded piezoelectric sensors and actuators for control of active composite structures. Available at: http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/
29.
SuZWangXChenZ. (2006a) A built-in active sensor network for health monitoring of composite structures. Smart Materials and Structures15: 1939.
30.
SuZYeLLuY (2006b) Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration295: 753–780.
31.
TanimotoTOkazakiKYamamotoK (1993) Tensile stress-strain behavior of piezoelectric ceramics. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics32: 4233–4236.
32.
WarkentinDJCrawleyEFSenturiaSD (1992) The feasibility of embedded electronics for intelligent structures. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures3: 462–482.
33.
WilkieWKInmanDJLloydJM. (2006) Anisotropic laminar piezocomposite actuator incorporating machined PMN–PT single-crystal fibers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures17: 15–28.
34.
WinkelmannCLestariWLa SaponaraV (2011) Composite structural health monitoring through use of embedded PZT sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. Epub ahead of print 19May. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X11406303.
35.
YangGLiuS-FRenW. (2000) Uniaxial stress dependence of the piezoelectric properties of lead zirconate titanate ceramics. In: Proceedings of the SPIE’s 7th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials, Newport Beach, CA, 6 March, pp. 103–113. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
36.
Zamorano SenderosBElvinN (2013) High-speed impact location detection on anisotropic composite panels using embedded piezoelectric sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. Epub ahead of print 19 November. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X13512188.
37.
ZhaoSErturkA (2013) Electroelastic modeling and experimental validations of piezoelectric energy harvesting from broadband random vibrations of cantilevered bimorphs. Smart Materials and Structures22: 015002.
