This article describes how an extrinsically amplified Cymbal-type piezoelectric actuator is optimized for displacement generation by using genetic algorithms in combination with COMSOL Multiphysics finite element method modeling software. The research was focused on optimizing the shape of the end cap profile in a quasi-static operation scheme in order to keep the number of parameters and calculation times at a reasonable level. In contrast to conventional linear end cap profiles, a genetic algorithm tends to generate more complex shapes and especially a corrugated structure in the vicinity of the output point of force and displacement. Modeling showed that about 26.9% higher displacement could be produced with a complex shape derived by the algorithm compared with a linear end cap profile. Moreover, about the same level of displacement as achieved with a wagon wheel transducer was obtained simply by profile optimization without material removal, which could, however, improve performance even further. The developed genetic algorithm proved to be a feasible tool for complex multi-parameter optimization, utilizable in a wide range of shape and structure optimizations for future electromechanical components.
AdamsDBWatsonLTGürdalZ (2002) Blending of composite panel designs using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of international parallel and distributed processing symposium, IPDPS2002, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 15–19 April, pp. 409–414. New York: IEEE.
2.
BruantIGallimardLNikoukarS (2010) Optimal piezoelectric actuator and sensor location for active vibration control using genetic algorithm. Journal of Sound and Vibration329: 1615–1635.
3.
ChangL-KTsaiM-C (2014) Design of star-shaped flextensional stator for ultrasonic motor. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Epub ahead of print 26 May. DOI: 10.1155/2014/162535.
4.
ChiuC-WChaoPC-PWuD-Y (2007) Optimal design of magnetically actuated optical image stabilizer mechanism for cameras in mobile phones via genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics43(6): 2582–2584.
5.
CodreanuI (2005) A parallel between differential evolution and genetic algorithms with exemplification in a microfluidics optimization problem. In: Proceedings of the international semiconductor conference, CAS2005, vol. 2, Sinaia, Romania, 5 October, pp. 421–424. New York: IEEE.
6.
DarnobytIKryvyyRLoburM. (2008) Possibilities of the use of genetic algorithms in design of MEMS elements. In: Proceedings of international conference on perspective technologies and methods in MEMS design, MEMSTECH2008, Polyana, 21–24 May, p. 87. New York: IEEE.
7.
EibenAESmithJE (2003) Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
8.
FrancoVRVarotoPS (2013) On different optimization techniques applied to vibration-based piezoelectric energy harvesting. In: Proceedings XV international symposium on dynamic problems of mechanics, XV DINAME, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 17–22 February, pp. 1–4. ABCM.
IwasakiTIkedaM (2001) Optimal design of flat structures for vibration suppression. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on control applications, CCA2001, Mexico City, Mexico, 5–7 September, pp. 583–587. New York: IEEE.
11.
KocBDoganAFernándezJF. (1996) Accelerometer application of the modified Moonie (Cymbal) transducer. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics35: 4547–4549.
LeinonenMPalosaariJJuutiJ. (2014) Combined electrical and electromechanical simulations of a piezoelectric cymbal harvester for energy harvesting from walking. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures25(4): 391–400.
14.
LeuGSimionSSerbanescuA (2004) MEMS optimization using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of international semiconductor conference, CAS2004, vol. 2, Sinaia, Romania, 4–6 October, pp. 475–478. New York: IEEE.
15.
LiXShihWYVartuliJS. (2002) Effect of a transverse tensile stress on the electric-field-induced domain reorientation in soft PZT: in situ XRD study. Journal of the American Ceramic Society86(4): 844–850.
16.
MaioneEShungKKMeyerRJ. (2002) Transducer design for a portable ultrasound enhanced transdermal drug-delivery system. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control49: 1430–1436.
17.
MeyerRJHughesWJMontgomeryTC. (2002) Design of and fabrication improvements to the cymbal transducer aided by finite element analysis. Journal of Electroceramics8: 163–174.
18.
MotieeMKhajepourAMansourRR (2008) A new topology optimization method for multi-physics micro domains. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME international conference on mechatronic and embedded systems and applications, MESA2008, Beijing, China, 12–15 October, pp. 106–111. New York: IEEE.
19.
NarayananMSchwartzR (2010) Design fabrication and finite element modeling of a new wagon wheel flextensional transducer. Journal of Electroceramics24: 205–213.
20.
ObayashiSSasakiDTakeguchiY. (2000) Multiobjective evolutionary computation for supersonic wing-shape optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation4(2): 182–187.
21.
OyamaAObayashiSNakahashiK (1999) Wing design using real-coded adaptive range genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, IEEE SMC1999, vol. 4, Tokyo, Japan, 12–15 October, pp. 475–480. New York: IEEE.
22.
PalosaariJJuutiJHeinonenE. (2009) Electromechanical performance of structurally graded monolithic piezoelectric actuator. Journal of Electroceramics22(1): 156–162.
23.
SaxenaA (2005) Topology design of large displacement compliant mechanisms with multiple materials and multiple output ports. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization30(6): 477–490.
24.
SilvaENaderGShirahigeA. (2003) Characterization of novel flextensional actuators designed by using topology optimization method. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures14(4–5): 297–308.
25.
TresslerJFDoganAFernándezJF. (1995) Capped ceramic hydrophones. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE ultrasonics symposium, vol. 2, Seattle, WA, 7–10 November, pp. 897–900. New York: IEEE.
26.
ZhangQMZhaoJ (1999) Electromechanical properties of lead zirconate titanate piezoceramics under the influence of mechanical stresses. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control46(6): 1518–1526.
