A smart sensing layer based on polystyrene and carbon nanoparticles has been developed. It has been deposited on the composite specimens for real-time, in situ monitoring of structural health. The strain response of the smart sensing layer has been recorded for composite laminates using different defect configurations (notch spacing). Numerical simulations of the stress–strain concentration have been carried out in order to determine the state of strain at the smart sensing layer, in the presence of different notch configurations. It has been observed that the sensing layer detects well the presence of large deformations and damage due to defects in the structure, with clearly defined peaks at the points of structural damage.
AbryJCBochardSChateauminoisA. (1999) In situ detection of damage in CFRP laminates by electrical resistance measurements. Composites Science and Technology59(6): 925–935.
2.
AbryJCChoiYKChateauminoisA. (2001) In-situ monitoring of damage in CFRP laminates by means of AC and DC measurements. Composites Science and Technology61(6): 855–864.
3.
BalageasDFritzenC-PGuemesA (2006) Structural Health Monitoring. Wiley: USA.
4.
ChangF-K (1998) Structural Health Monitoring: Current Status and Perspectives. CRC Press: USA.
5.
ChangF-KMarkmillerJFCYangJ. (2011) Structural health monitoring. In: JohnsonSBGormleyTKesslerS. (eds) System Health Management: With Aerospace Applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 419–428.
6.
DoeblingSWFarrarCRPrimeMB. (1996) Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
7.
FinlaysonRDFrieselMCarlosM. (2001) Health monitoring of aerospace structures with acoustic emission and acousto-ultrasonics. Insight43(3): 155–158.
8.
GurneyRWCondonEU (1929) Quantum mechanics and radioactive disintegration. Physical Review33(2): 127.
9.
HechtDSHuLGrunerG (2007) Electronic properties of carbon nanotube/fabric composites. Current Applied Physics7(1): 60–63.
10.
JohnsonTMFullwoodDTHansenG (2012) Strain monitoring of carbon fiber composite via embedded nickel nano-particles. Composites Part B: Engineering43(3): 1155–1163.
11.
LiCThostensonETChouT-W (2008) Sensors and actuators based on carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Composites Science and Technology68(6): 1227–1249.
12.
LiWHeDDangZ. (2014) In situ damage sensing in the glass fabric reinforced epoxy composites containing CNT-Al2O3 hybrids. Composites Science and Technology99(0): 8–14.
13.
LynchJPLohKJ (2006) A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock and Vibration Digest38(2): 91–130.
14.
NaumanSCristianIKoncarV (2011a) Simultaneous application of fibrous piezoresistive sensors for compression and traction detection in glass laminate composites. Sensors11(10): 9478–9498.
15.
NaumanSCristianIKoncarV (2012) Intelligent carbon fibre composite based on 3D-interlock woven reinforcement. Textile Research Journal82(9): 931–944.
16.
NaumanSLapeyronniePCristianI. (2011b) Online measurement of structural deformations in composites. IEEE Sensors Journal11(6): 1329–1336.
17.
RisicatoJ-VKellyFSoulatD. (2014) A complex shaped reinforced thermoplastic composite part made of commingled yarns with integrated sensor. Applied Composite Materials1–18.
18.
SebastianJSchehlNBouchardM. (2014) Health monitoring of structural composites with embedded carbon nanotube coated glass fiber sensors. Carbon66: 191–200.
19.
SohnHFarrarCRHemezFM. (2004) A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
20.
ThostensonETChouTW (2006) Carbon nanotube networks: sensing of distributed strain and damage for life prediction and self healing. Advanced Materials18(21): 2837–2841.
21.
ZouYTongLStevenGP (2000) Vibration-based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures—a review. Journal of Sound and vibration230(2): 357–378.
