It is essential to have a robust sensor fault detection and isolation algorithm integrated with successful online continuous structural health monitoring scheme to avoid false alarms. In this work, a sensor fault detection and isolation technique based on null subspace method is presented. The robustness of the proposed sensor failure detection and isolation algorithm is demonstrated using the vibration data obtained from an experimental study of a scaled down bridge model. Studies presented in this article clearly indicate that the proposed method is robust in identification of exact time instant of sensor fault and also isolation of faulty sensor. The proposed algorithm is equally good for all possible types of sensor faults (both additive and multiplicative) and also capable of isolating multiple sensor faults in spatial location of the structure.
AbdelghaniMFriswellMI (2004) Sensor validation for structural systems with additive sensor faults. Structural Health Monitoring3(3): 265–275.
2.
AbdelghaniMFriswellMI (2007) Sensor validation for structural systems with multiplicative sensor faults. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing21: 270–279.
3.
DuniaRQinSJ (1998) Joint diagnosis of process and sensor faults using principal component analysis. Control Engineering Practice6: 457–469.
4.
DuniaRQinSJEdgarTF. (1996) Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. AIChE Journal42(10): 2797–2812.
5.
FriswellMIInmanDJ (1999) Sensor validation for smart structures. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures10: 973–982.
6.
FriswellMIInmanDJ (2000) Sensor validation of smart structures. In: Proceedings of IMAC-XVIII: a conference on structural dynamics, San Antonio, TX, 7–10 February, pp. 483–489. Society for experimental Mechanics. Bethel, Conneticut.
7.
HermansLVan Den AuweraerH (1999) Modal testing and analysis of structures under operational conditions: industrial applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing13(2): 193–216.
8.
Hernandez-GarciaMRMasriSF (2008) Multivariate statistical analysis for detection and identification of faulty sensors using latent variable methods. Advances in Science and Technology56: 501–507.
9.
Hernandez-GarciaMRMasriSF (2013) Application of statistical monitoring using latent-variable techniques for detection of faults in sensor networks. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. Epub ahead of print 4March. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X13479182.
10.
KerschenGDe BoePGolinvalJC. (2004) Sensor validation for on-line vibration monitoring. In: Proceedings of the second European workshop on structural health monitoring, Munich, 7–9 July, pp. 819–827. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
11.
KerschenGDe BoePGolinvalJC. (2005) Sensor validation using principal component analysis. Smart Materials and Structures14: 36–42.
12.
KramerMA (1992) Autoassociative neural networks. Computers & Chemical Engineering16: 313–328.
13.
KullaaJ (2006) Sensor fault identification and correction in structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of ISMA 2006, international conference on noise and vibration engineering, Leuven, 18–20 September, pp. 873–884. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Departement Werktuigkunde: Leuven.
14.
KullaaJ (2007) Sensor fault identification and correction in vibration-based multi channel structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA, 11–13 September, pp. 606–613. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
15.
KullaaJ (2009) Three models for sensor validation. In: Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA, 9–11 September, pp. 529–536. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
16.
LiZKohBHNagarajaiahS (2007) Detecting sensor failure via decoupled error function and inverse input–output model. Journal of Engineering Mechanics: ASCE133(11): 1222–1228.
17.
Rama Mohan RaoALakshmiKKrishna KumarS (2012) Sensor fault detection in large sensor networks using PCA with a multi-level search algorithm. Structural Durability and Health Monitoring8(3): 271–293.
18.
RencherAC (1998) Multivariable Statistical Influence and Applications. New York: Wiley.
19.
Van OverscheePDe MoorB (1996) Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory Implementation – Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20.
YanAMGolinvalJC (2006) Null-subspace-based damage detection of structures using vibration measurements. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing20: 611–626.
21.
YanAMDe BoePGolinvalJC (2003) Structural integral monitoring by vibration measurements. In: FM2003 – structural integrity and materials aging (ed SihGCTuSTWangZD), Shanghai, China, 19–22 August, pp. 363–370. ECUST Press, Shanghai, China.
