While wireless sensor networks have been successfully deployed on a variety of civil infrastructure systems for structural monitoring, past studies have shown that there is room for improvement in terms of network robustness and overall resource consumption efficiency. The mechanisms employed by biological nervous systems (e.g. signal modulation, communication, and integration) can be used as inspiration for overcoming the performance bottlenecks seen in existing wireless sensor nodes and networks. The mammalian auditory system is of particular interest due to its unique signal decomposition techniques (performed by the cochlea) that enable real-time processing of complex sound signals. In this article, a novel wireless sensor architecture based on the operational principles of cochlea is described. The performance of the proposed sensor is validated on a single-degree-of-freedom structure that is excited by seismic ground motion signals, thus demonstrating its real-time monitoring capabilities while maintaining high data compression rates.
AvissarMFurmanACSaundersJC. (2007) Adaptation reduces spike-count reliability, but not spike-timing precision, of auditory nerves responses. Journal of Neuroscience27: 6461–6472.
2.
BialekWRiekeFde Ruyter Van SteveninckRR. (1991) Reading a neural code. Science252: 1854–1857.
3.
CarterB (2000) A single-supply op-amp circuit collection. Report No. SLOA058, Texas Instruments, Dallas, Texas, USA.
4.
DallosP (1996) Overview: cochlear neurobiology. In: DallosPPopperANFayRR (eds) The Cochlea (Springer Handbook of Auditory Research). New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–43.
5.
ElliottSJSheraCA (2012) The cochlea as a smart structure. Smart Materials and Structures21: 064001.
6.
EmadiGRichterCPDallosP (2004) Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: radial and longitudinal vibrations. Journal of Neurophysiology91: 474–488.
7.
FeltrinGMeyerJBischoffR. (2010) Long-term monitoring of cable stays with a wireless sensor network. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance6: 535–548.
8.
HudspethAJ (1989) How the ear’s works work. Nature341: 397–404.
9.
HudspethAJ (2000) Hearing. In: KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM (eds) Principles of Neural Science. 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 590–624.
10.
JangSJoHChoK. (2010) Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: deployment and evaluation. Smart Structures and Systems5: 439–459.
11.
KandelER (2000) Nerve cells and behavior. In: KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM (eds) Principles of Neural Science. 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 19–35.
12.
KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM (2000) Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
KimJLynchJP (2012) Autonomous decentralized system identification by Markov parameter estimation using distributed smart wireless sensor networks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics138: 478–490.
14.
KimJSwartzRALynchJP. (2010) Rapid-to-deploy reconfigurable wireless structural monitoring systems using extended-range wireless sensors. Smart Structures and Systems6: 505–524.
15.
KimSPakzadSCullerD. (2007) Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on information processing in sensor networks, Cambridge, MA, 25–27 April. Cambridge, MA: ACM.
16.
KurataMKimJLynchJP. (2013) Internet-enabled wireless structural monitoring systems: development and permanent deployment at the New Carquinez suspension bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering139: 1688–1702.
17.
KurataNSpencerBFJrRuiz-SandovalM. (2003) A study on building risk monitoring using wireless sensor network MICA-Mote. In: First international conference on structural health monitoring and intelligent infrastructure, 13–15 November 2003, Tokyo, Japan.
18.
MeadC (1990) Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proceedings of the IEEE78: 1629–1636.
19.
NagayamaTSpencerBFJrRiceJA (2007) Structural health monitoring utilizing Intel’s Imote2 wireless sensor platform. In: Proceedings of the SPIE—sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems, San Diego, CA, 18 March, vol. 6529, article id 6592943.
20.
NichollsJGMartinARWallaceBG. (2001) From Neuron to Brain. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
21.
OlsonESMountainDC (1991) In vivo measurements of basilar membrane stiffness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America89: 1262–1275.
22.
PaikB-G (2009) Characteristics of wireless sensor network for full-scale ship application. Journal of Marine Science and Technology14: 115–126.
23.
PakzadSNFenvesGLKimS. (2008) Design and implementation of scalable wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. Journal of Infrastructure Systems14: 89–101.
24.
ParkJWChoSJungH-J. (2010) Long-term structural health monitoring system of a cable-stayed bridge based on wireless smart sensor networks and energy harvesting techniques. In: 5th world conference on structural control and monitoring. 12–14 July 2010, Tokyo, Japan.
25.
PeckensCALynchJP (2012) Cochlea-based signal decomposition and compression for structural monitoring applications. In: 2012 joint conference of the engineering mechanics institute and the 11th ASCE joint specialty conference on probabilistic mechanics and structural reliability, Notre Dame, IN, 17–20 June.
26.
PeckensCALynchJP (2013) Utilizing the cochlea as a bio-inspired compressive sensing technique. Smart Materials and Structures22: 105027.
27.
RiceJAMechitovKASimSH. (2010) Flexible smart sensor framework for autonomous structural health monitoring. Smart Structures and Systems6: 423–438.
28.
RiekeFWarlandDde Ruyter Van SteveninckRR. (1991) Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
29.
RolfesRZerbstSHaakeG. (2007) Integral SHM-system for offshore wind turbines using smart wireless sensors. In: The 6th international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA, 11–13 September.
30.
StraserEKiremidjianAS (1998) Modular, Wireless Damage Monitoring System for Structures. Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
31.
SwartzRAJungDLynchJP. (2005) Design of a wireless sensor for scalable distributed in-network computation in a structural health monitoring system. In: 5th international workshop on structural health monitoring, 12–14 September 2005, Stanford, CA.
32.
SwartzRAZimmermanATLynchJP. (2012) Hybrid wireless hull monitoring system for naval combat vessels. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering8: 621–638.
