This article presents a transient model of a magnetorheological damper, which takes into account the effect of Duhamel’s superposition of the variation of magnetorheological damper piston velocity with time. The magnetorheological fluid flow channel studied in this work is in the shape of an annular gap between the piston and the bore of the cylinder of the magnetorheological damper. The model was derived using a Bingham plastic model for shear stress versus shear rate behaviour of the magnetorheological fluid by applying the combination of Laplace and Weber transforms to the Navier–Stokes equations for obtaining the analytical solutions of the velocity in the sheared regions in a given cross section of an annular magnetorheological fluid flow channel. The solution is further modified to include the effect of time variation of piston velocity by using Duhamel’s superposition integral. The equations of the velocity profiles have been used to obtain the equations of mass flow rate balance, velocity compatibility for the plug flow boundaries and equilibrium of forces acting on the plug. The set of non-linear algebraic equations has been solved by Newton–Raphson’s method. The proposed model has been validated by comparison with the experimental results.
AhmedianMNorrisJA (2008) Experimental analysis of magnetorheological dampers when subjected to impact and shock loading. Communication in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation13(9):1978–1985.
2.
BagleyRL (1983) A theoretical basis for the application of fractional calculus to viscoelasticity. Journal of Rheology27: 201–210.
3.
BatterbeeDCSimsNDStanwayR. (2007a) Magnetorheological landing gear: 1. A design methodology. Smart Materials and Structures16: 2429–2440.
4.
BatterbeeDCSimsNDStanwayR. (2007b) Magnetorheological landing gear: 2. Validation using experimental data. Smart Materials and Structures16: 2441–2452.
5.
BhatnagarRMBhattacharyaBBiswasG (2009) Analysis of pilot valve and taper groove based damper. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 223(C4): 859–871.
6.
ButzTVon StrykO (2002) Modelling and simulation of electro- and magnetorheological fluid dampers. ZAMM – Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik Mechanik82: 3–20.
7.
CarlsonJDJollyMR (2000) MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices. Mechatronics10: 555–569.
8.
CarlsonJDCatanzariteDMSt ClaireKA (1996) Commercial magnetorheological devices. International Journal of Modern Physics B10(23–24): 2857–2865.
9.
CesmeciSTehsinE (2010) Modelling and testing of field controllable magnetorheological fluid damper. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences52: 1036–1040.
10.
ChangCCRoschkeP (1998) Neural network modelling of a magnetorheological damper. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures9(9): 755–764.
11.
ChoiYTWereleyNMJeonYS (2002) Semi-active vibration isolation using magnetorheological isolators. Proceedings of SPIE: Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Damping and Isolation4697: 284–291.
12.
ChooiWWOyadijiSO (2008) Design, modelling and testing of magnetorheological (MR) dampers using analytical flow solutions. Computers & Structures86: 473–482.
DasDArakeriJ (1998) Transition of unsteady velocity profiles with unsteady flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics374: 252–283.
15.
DominguezASedaghatiRStiharuI (2004) Modelling the hysteresis phenomenon of magnetorheological dampers. Smart Materials and Structures13: 1351–1361.
16.
DykeSJSpencerBFJrSainMK. (1997) An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection. Smart Materials and Structures7: 693–703.
17.
EhrgottRCMasriSF (1992) Modelling the oscillatory dynamic behaviour of ER materials. Smart Materials and Structures8(5): 602–615.
18.
FaceyWBRosenfeldNCChoiYT. (2005) Design and testing of a compact magnetorheological damper for high impulsive loads. International Journal of Modern Physics B19(7–9): 1549–1555.
19.
FalkFKonopkaP (1990) Three-dimensional Landau theory describing the martensitic phase transformation of shape memory alloys. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2: 61–77.
20.
FetecauCFetecauC (2005) Starting solutions for some unsteady unidirectional flows of a second grade fluid. International Journal of Engineering Science43: 781–789.
21.
FetecauCFetecauC (2006) Starting solutions for motion of a second grade fluid due to longitudinal and torsional oscillations of a circular cylinder. International Journal of Engineering Science44: 788–796.
22.
FriedrichC (1991) Relaxation and retardation functions of the Maxwell model with fractional derivatives. Rheologica Acta30: 151–158.
23.
FrigaardAHowisonSDSobeyIJ (1994) On the stability of Poiseuille flow of a Bingham fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics263: 133–150.
24.
GandhiFWangKWXiaL (2001) Magnetorheological fluid damper feedback linearization control for helicopter rotor application. Smart Materials and Structures10: 96–103.
25.
GargVKRouleauWT (1972) Linear spatial stability of pipe Poiseuille flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics54(1): 113–127.
26.
GavinHHoaggJDobossyM (2001) Optimal design of MR dampers. In: Proceedings of US Japan workshop on smart structures for improved seismic performance in urban regions, Seattle, WA, August, pp. 225–236.
27.
GavinHPHansonRDFiliskoFE (1996) Electrorheological damper 2. Testing and modeling. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics63(3): 676–682.
28.
HayatTKhanMAyubM (2006) Some analytical solutions for second grade fluid flows for cylindrical geometries. Mathematical and Computer Modelling43: 16–29.
29.
HayatTKhanMAyubM. (2005) The unsteady Couette flow of a second grade fluid in a layer of porous medium. Archives of Mechanics57: 404–416.
30.
HayatTKhanMSiddiquiAM. (2004) Transient flows of a second grade fluid. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics39: 1621–1631.
31.
HedströmBOA (1952) Flow of plastic materials in pipes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry44(3): 652–656.
32.
HiemenzGJWereleyGChoiYT. (2003) Seismic control of civil structures utilizing semi-active MR braces. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering18: 31–44.
33.
HongSRChoiSBChoiYT. (2005) A hydro-mechanical model for hysteretic damping force prediction of ER damper: experimental verification. Journal of Sound and Vibration285: 1180–1188.
34.
JiangJTianYRenD. (2011) An experimental study on the normal stress of magnetorheological fluids. Smart Materials and Structures20: 085012–085022.
35.
KamathGMHurtKMWereleyNM (1996) Analysis and testing of Bingham plastic behavior in semi-active electrorheological fluid dampers. Smart Materials and Structures5(5): 576–590.
36.
KamathGMWereleyNMJollyMR (1999) Characterization of magnetorheological helicopter lag dampers. Journal of the American Helicopter Society44: 234–248.
37.
LeeDYWereleyNM (1999) Quasi steady Herschel–Bulkley analysis of electro-and magneto-rheological flow mode dampers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures10: 761–769.
38.
LiWH (2000) Rheology of MR fluids and MR damper dynamic response: experimental and modelling approaches. PhD Dissertation, School of Mechanical and Production Engineering, The Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
39.
LipscombGGDennMM (1984) Flow of Bingham fluids in complex geometries. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics14: 337–346.
MaoMChoiYTWereleyNM (2005) Effective design strategy for a magnetorheological damper using a nonlinear flow model. Proceedings of SPIE5760: 446–455.
42.
MishraPTripathiG (1971) Transition from laminar to turbulent flow of purely viscous non-Newtonian fluids in tubes. Chemical Engineering Science26: 915–921.
43.
MohammedIFayçalIRodellarJ (2007) The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering16(2): 161–188.
44.
NouarCFrigaardIA (2001) Nonlinear stability of Poiseuille flow of a Bingham fluid: theoretical results and comparison with phenomenological criteria. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics100(1–3): 127–149.
45.
NovakZGajdeczkoB (1983) Laminar entrance region flow of the Bingham fluid. Acta Mechanica49: 191–200.
46.
OhHUOnodaJ (2002) An experimental study of a semiactive magneto-rheological fluid variable damper for vibration suppression of truss structures. Smart Materials and Structures11: 156–162.
47.
ÖzisikMN (1980) Heat Conduction. New York: Wiley.
48.
ParkDWChoiSBSuhMS. (2001) ER suspension units for vibration control of a tracked vehicle. Proceedings of SPIE4327: 159–164.
49.
PhillipsRW (1969) Engineering application of fluids with a variable yield stress. PhD Thesis, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
50.
PooleRJChhabraRP (2010) Development length requirement for fully developed laminar pipe flow of yield stress fluids. Journal of Fluids Engineering132(3): 034501–034505.
51.
PoynorJC (2001) Innovative designs for magneto-rheological dampers. Master Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
52.
RosenfeldNCWereleyNM (2004) Volume constrained optimization of magnetorheological and electrorheological valves and dampers. Smart Materials and Structures13: 1301–1313.
53.
SimsNDPeelDJStanwayR. (2000) The electrorheological long-stroke damper: a new modelling technique with experimental validation. Journal of Sound and Vibration229(2): 207–227.
54.
SpencerBFJrDykeSJSainMK. (1997) Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE123: 230–238.
55.
StanwayRSprostonJLStevensNG (1987) Non-linear modelling of an electro-rheological vibration damper. Journal of Electrostatics20: 167–184.
56.
SymansMDConstantinouMC (1999) Semiactive control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state of the art review. Engineering Structures21(6): 469–487.
57.
TanWPanWXuM (2003) A note on unsteady flows of a viscoelastic fluid with the fractional Maxwell model between two parallel plates. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics38: 645–650.
58.
WangDHLiaoWH (2011) Magnetorheological fluid dampers: a review of parametric modeling. Smart Materials and Structures20: 1–34.
59.
WangERMaXQRakhelaS. (2003) Modelling the hysteretic characteristics of a magnetorheological fluid damper. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D217: 537–550.
60.
WangSXuM (2009) Couette flow of two kinds of fractional viscoelastic fluids in an annulus. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications10: 1087–1096.
61.
WangXGordaninejadF (2007) Flow analysis and modeling of field controllable, electro- and magnetorheological fluid dampers. Journal of Applied Mechanics74: 13–22.
62.
WereleyNMKamathGMMadhavanV (1999) Hysteresis modeling of semi-active magnetorheological helicopter lag dampers. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures10(8): 624–633.
63.
XuMTanW (2001) Theoretical analysis of the velocity field, stress field and vortex sheet of generalized second order fluid with fractional anomalous diffusions. Science in China Series A44: 1387–1399.
64.
ZhaoYChoiYTWereleyNM (2004) Semi-active damping of ground resonance in helicopters using magnetorheological dampers. Journal of the American Helicopter Society49(4): 468–482.
