The tartaric acid was laterally attached to polyurethane through the carbamate of polyurethane, and the impact on the shape-memory and tensile properties of polyurethane was investigated. The electrostatic repulsion of the tartarate could reduce the molecular interactions between polyurethanes, a result that was designed to improve low-temperature flexibility while maintaining high and reproducible tensile strength and shape recovery above room temperature. The attachment of the tartaric acid was quantitatively determined by acid–base titration, and the change in the molecular interaction between hard segments was confirmed via infrared spectroscopy. Both cross-linking density and viscosity experienced an unusual increase with increasing tartarate content due to partial cross-linking caused by the grafting reagent. Shape recovery and retention were reproducible over repeated shape-memory tests. Finally, the low-temperature flexibility was determined at −10°C, and the reason for the difference was discussed.
AlvesPCoelhoJFJHaackJ. (2009) Surface modification and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane. European Polymer Journal45: 1412–1419.
2.
ArchambaultJGBrashJL (2004) Protein resistant polyurethane surfaces by chemical grafting of PEO: amino-terminated PEO as grafting reagent. Colloid Surfaces B: Biointerfaces39: 9–16.
3.
ChungYCChoTKChunBC (2009) Flexible cross-linking by both pentaerythritol and polyethyleneglycol spacer and its impact on the mechanical properties and the shape memory effects of polyurethane. Journal of Applied Polymer Science112: 2800–2808.
4.
ChungYCChoiJHChunBC (2008) Shape-memory effects of polyurethane copolymer crosslinked by dextrin. Journal of Material Science43: 6366–6373.
5.
ChungYCNguyenDKChunBC (2010) Lateral flexible linking of polyurethane copolymer and the effect on shape recovery and tensile mechanical properties. Polymer Engineering and Science50: 2457–2466.
6.
DanielsPH (2005) Hydrocarbon secondary plasticizers as functional additives in flexible PVC compounds. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology11: 76–82.
7.
EsquivelDBouJJMunoz-GuerraS (2003) Synthesis, characterization and degradability of polyamides derived from tartaric acid and diaminoethers. Polymer44: 6169–6177.
8.
Freij-LarssonCWesslenB (1993) Grafting of polyurethane surfaces with poly(ethylene glycol). Journal of Applied Polymer Science50: 345–352.
9.
HuangJXuW (2010) Zwitterionic monomer graft copolymerization onto polyurethane surface through a PEG spacer. Applied Surface Science256: 3921–3927.
10.
KykerGSAntkowiakTA (1974) Phosphonitrilic fluoroelastomers—a new class of solvent resistant polymers with exceptional flexibility at low temperature. Rubber Chemistry and Technology47: 32–48.
11.
LeeBSChunBCChungYC. (2001) Structure and thermomechanical properties of polyurethane block copolymers with shape memory effect. Macromolecules34: 6431–6437.
12.
LendleinAKelchS (2002) Shape-memory polymers. Angewante Chemie International Edition41: 2034–2057.
LottersJCOlthuisWVeltinkPH. (1997) The mechanical properties of the rubber elastic polymer polydimethylsiloxane for sensor applications. Journal of Micromechanic and Microengineering7: 145–147.
15.
MakalUUilkJKurtP. (2005) Ring opening polymerization of 3-semifluoro- and 3-bromomethyloxetanes to poly(2,2-substituted-1,3-propylene oxide) telechelics for soft blocks in polyurethanes. Polymer46: 2522–2530.
16.
MarquesMSReganoCNyugenJ. (2000) Hydrolytic and fungal degradation of polyamides derived from tartaric acid and hexamethylenediamine. Polymer41: 2765–2772.
17.
MondalSHuJL (2006) Free volume and water vapor permeability of dense segmented polyurethane membrane. Journal of Membrane Science276: 16–22.
18.
PaikIHGooNSJungYC. (2006) Development and application of conducting shape memory polyurethane actuators. Smart Material and Structure15: 1476–1482.
19.
PetrovicZSJavniIDivjakovicV (1998) Structure and physical properties of segmented polyurethane elastomers containing chemical crosslinks in the hard segment. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics36: 221–235.
20.
Rueda-LarrazLFernandez d’ArlasBTercjakA. (2009) Synthesis and microstructure–mechanical property relationships of segmented polyurethanes based on a PCL–PTHF–PCL block copolymer as soft segment. European Polymer Journal45: 2096–2109.
21.
SchmidtAM (2006) Electromagnetic activation of shape memory polymer networks containing magnetic nanoparticles. Macromolecular Rapid Communication27: 1168–1172.
22.
SekkarVGopalakrishnanSAmbika DeviK (2003) Studies on allophanate–urethane networks based on hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene: effect of isocyanate type on the network characteristics. European Polymer Journal39: 1281–1290.
23.
SekkarVRaoMRKrishnamurthyVN. (1996) Modeling of polyurethane networks based on hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene and poly(12-hydroxy stearic acid-co-TMP) ester polyol—correlation of network parameters with mechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science62: 2317–2327.
24.
SubramaniSParkYJLeeYS. (2003) New development of polyurethane dispersion derived from blocked aromatic diisocyanate. Progress in Organic Coating48: 71–79.
25.
TakahashiTHayashiNHayashiS (1996) Structure and properties of shape-memory polyurethane block-copolymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science60: 1061–1069.
26.
TanKObendorfSK (2006) Surface modification of microporous polyurethane membrane with poly(ethylene glycol) to develop a novel membrane. Journal of Membrane Science274: 150–158.
27.
TobushiHHaraHYamadaE. (1996) Thermomechanical properties in a thin film of shape memory polymer of polyurethane series. Smart Material and Structure5: 483–491.
XieZLuCChenX. (2007) A facile approach to biodegradable poly(ϵ-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-based polyurethanes containing pendant amino groups. European Polymer Journal43: 2080–2087.
30.
ZhangSFengYZhangL. (2007) Novel interpenetrating networks with shape-memory properties. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Chemistry45: 768–775.
