Airfoil Structural Morphing Based on S.M.A. Actuator Series: Numerical and Experimental Studies

Abstract

Multiple flight regimes during typical aircraft missions mean that a single unique optimized configuration, that maximizes aerodynamic efficiency and maneuverability, cannot be defined. Discrete components such as ailerons and flaps provide some adaptability, although they are far from optimal. Wing morphing can significantly improve the performance of future aircraft, by adapting the wing shape to the specific flight regime requirements, but also represents a challenging problem: the structure has to be stiff to maintain its shape under loads, and yet be flexible to deform without collapse. One solution is to adopt structural elements made of smart materials; Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) have demonstrated their suitability for many static applications due to their high structural integration potential and remarkable actuation capabilities.

In this work, the airfoil camber at the wing trailing edge on a full scale wing of a civil regional transportation aircraft is controlled by substituting a traditional split flap with a hingeless, smooth morphed flap. Firstly, the development and testing of an actuator device based on a SMA ribbon, capable of a net rotation of 5 deg, is presented. Then, a flap bay is designed and experimentally tested in presence of static loads, based on a compliant rib built as a series repetition of the proposed actuator. An aero-thermo-mechanical simulation within a FE approach was adopted to estimate the behavior and performance of the compliant rib, integrating both aerodynamic loads, by means of a Vortex Lattice Method (VLM) code, and SMA phenomenology, implementing Liang and Rogers’ constitutive model. The prototype showed good actuation performance even in presence of external loads. Very good numerical-experimental correlation is found for the unloaded case, while some fatigue issues emerged in presence of static loads.

Keywords

smart structures SMA morphing hingeless flap actuator.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, D. and Friswell, M.I. 2008. ‘‘The Design of Morphing Aerofoils using Compliant Mechanisms,’’ In: Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies, October 6-9, Ascona, Switzerland.

Barbarino, S. , Ameduri, S. and Pecora, R. 2007. ‘‘Wing Camber Control Architectures based on SMA: Numerical Investigation,’’ In: International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering (SMN2007), July 1-4, Harbin, China, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 6423, 64231E-1, 8pp., doi: 10.1117/12.779397.

Barbarino, S. , Ameduri, S. , Lecce, L. and Concilio, A. 2009a. ‘‘Wing Shape Control through an SMA-Based Device,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 20:283-296.

Barbarino, S. , Pecora, R. , Lecce, L. , Concilio, A. , Ameduri, S. and Calvi, E. 2009b. ‘‘A Novel SMA-Based Concept for Airfoil Structural Morphing,’’ Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance (JMEP), 18:696-705. doi:10.1007/s11665-009-9356-3.

Bilgen, O. , Kochersberger, K.B. , Inman, D.J. and Ohanian, III. O.J. 2009. ‘‘Novel, Bi-Directional, Variable Camber Airfoil via Macro-Fiber Composite Actuators,’’ 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp. 2009-2133, AIAA J, Palm Springs, California, May 4-7.

Blondeau, J. and Pines, D. 2004. ‘‘Pneumatic Morphing Aspect Ratio Wing,’’ 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, pp. 2004-1808, AIAA J, Palm Springs, California.

Brinson, L.C. , Bekker, A. and Huang, M. 1996. ‘‘Deformation of Shape Memory Alloys due to Thermo-Induced Transformation,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 7:97-107.

Bowman, J. , Sanders, B. and Weisshaar, T. 2002. ‘‘Evaluating the Impact of Morphing Technologies on Aircraft Performance,’’ AIAA Journal, 1631.

Buehler, W.J. , Gilfrich, J.V. and Wiley, R.C. 1963. ‘‘Effect of Low-Temperature Phase Changes on the Mechanical Properties of Alloys Near Composition TiNi, ’’ Journal of Applied Physics, 34:1475.

10.

Chopra, I. 2002. ‘‘Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and Integrated Systems,’’ In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference , Seattle, WA, AIAA Journal, Vol. 40, No.11.

11.

Flanagan, J.S. , Strutzenberg, R.C. , Myers, R.B. and Rodrian, J.E. 2007. ‘‘Development and Flight Testing of a Morphing Aircraft, the NextGen MFX-1,’’ 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials, pp. 2007--1707, AIAA J, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 23-26.

12.

Flexsys Inc. , Website: http://www.flxsys.com/index.shtml .

13.

Frost et al. 1978. ‘‘Airfoil Variable Cambering Device and Method,’’ United States Patent no.4,247,066, General Dynamics Corporation, Fort Worth, TX.

14.

Gevers, D.E. 1997. ‘‘Multi-Purpose Aircraft,’’ US Patent No. 5,645,250.

15.

Goldberg, D.E. 1989. ‘‘Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning’’, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc, ISBN, 0-201-15767-5.

16.

Gonzalez, L. and Rediniotis, O. 2005. ‘‘Morphing Wing Using SMA,’’ T.I.I.M.S. 3rd Annual Meeting.

17.

Hasse, A. and Campanile, L.F. 2009. ‘‘Design of Compliant Mechanisms with Selective Compliance,’’ Smart Materials and Structures, 18:115016.

18.

Iannuzzo, G. , Riccio, M. , Russo, S. , Calvi, E. , Pecora, R. , Lecce, L. , Barbarino, S. , Concilio, A. and Ameduri, S. 2009. ‘‘An Actuator Device Based on a Shape Memory Alloy, and a Wing Flap Assembly Fitted with Such an Actuator Device,’’ Filed on July 21, 2009 at the European Patent Office, 2280 HV Rijswijk, Netherland, application/patent no. 09165941-7 - 1254, proprietor Alenia Aeronautica S.p.a., priority IT/23.07.08/ITA TO20080566.

19.

Ivanco, T.G. , Scott, R.C. , Love, M.H. , Zink, S. and Weisshaar, T.A. 2007. ‘‘Validation of the Lockheed Martin Morphing Concept with Wind Tunnel Testing,’’ In: 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp. 2007-2235, Honolulu, Hawaii, AIAA JApril 23-26.

20.

Kudva, J.N. 2001. ‘‘Overview of the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing Phase II Program,’’ Smart Structures and Materials Conference, USA, SPIE No.4332-48, pp. 383-389.

21.

Kuethe, A.M. and Chow, C.Y. 1996. ‘‘Foundations of Aerodynamics: Bases of Aerodynamic Design,’’, 4th edn, J.W.&SONS Inc, New York.

22.

Lesieutre, G.A. , Frecker, M. and Mehta, V. 2008. ‘‘ Compliant Frame : A New Paradigm to Enable Reconfigurable Aircraft Structures,’’ Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 28 February 2008.

23.

Liang, C. and Rogers, C.A. 1990. ‘‘One-Dimensional Thermomechanical Constitutive Relations for Shape Memory Material,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1:207-234.

24.

McGowan, A.R. , Horta, L.G. , Harrison, J.S. and Raney, D.L. 1999. ‘‘Research Activities within NASA’s Morphing Program,’’ In: RTO Meeting Proceedings 36 (AC/323(AVT)TP/17) from the RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on ‘‘Structural Aspects of Flexible Aircraft Control’’ , Ottawa (AL-CAN), October 1999.

25.

Mirone, G. 2007. ‘‘Design and Demonstrators Testing of Adaptive Airfoils and Hingeless Wings Actuated by Shape Memory Alloy Wires, ’’ Smart Structures and Systems, 3:89-114.

26.

Monner, H.P. , Bein, T. , Hanselka, H. and Breitbach, E. 1998. ‘‘Design Aspects of the Adaptive Wing - The Elastic Trailing Edge and the Local Spoiler Bump,’’ Royal Aeronautical Society, Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization, London.

27.

Parker, H.F. 1920. ‘‘The Parker Variable Camber Wing,’’ Annual Report National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics , report no.77.

28.

Richards, R. 2001. ‘‘Principles of Solid Mechanics,’’ , pp. 162-164, CRC Press LLC, ISBN 0-8493-0114-9.

29.

Shimizu, K. and Tadaki, T. 1987. ‘‘Shape Memory Alloys,’’ In: Funakubo, H. (ed.), pp. 1-60, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.

30.

Song, G. and Ma, N. 2007. ‘‘Robust Control of a Shape Memory Alloy Wire Actuated Flap,’’ Smart Materials and Structures , 16:N51-N57.

31.

Spillman, J. 1992. ‘‘The Use of Variable Chamber to Reduce Drag, Weight and Costs of Transport Aircraft,’’ The Aeronautical Journal, 96:1-8.

32.

Stanewsky, E. 2001. ‘‘Adaptive Wing and Flow Control Technology,’’ , Vol.37, pp. 583-667, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Elsevier Science Ltd.

33.

Statkus, F.D. 1980. ‘‘Continuous Skin Variable Camber Airfoil Edge Actuating Mechanism,’’, United States Patent No. 4,351,502, The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA.

34.

Stubbs, M.D. 2003. ‘‘Kinematic Design and Analysis of a Morphing Wing,’’ Master thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, December 2003.

35.

Thill, C. , Etches, J. , Bond, I. , Potter, K. and Weaver, P. 2008. ‘‘Morphing Skins,’’ The Aeronautical Journal, 112.

36.

Wildschek, A. , Grünewald, M. , Maier, R. , Steigenberger, J. , Judas, M. , Deligiannidis, N. and Aversa, N. 2008. ‘‘Multi-Functional Morphing Trailing Edge Device for Control of All-Composite, All-Electric Flying Wing Aircraft,’’ The 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), pp. 2008-8956, AIAA J, Anchorage, Alaska, September 14-19.