Based on the full-spectral response of fiber Bragg grating sensors, embedded at the facesheet-core interface, we identify the progression of failure modes in foam core sandwich composites during multiple, low-velocity impacts. By considering the characteristic shape of the reflected spectrum from the FBG sensor in the post-impact, residual strain state, it is shown that we can classify the extent of damage into one of three states. Unlike the previous FBG peak wavelength measurements; this identification does not require the full strain history to identify the current state of damage in the composite. The disparate material properties between the facesheet and core materials, which create significant challenges for conventional non-destructive evaluation methods, enhance the damage detection through large deformations in the core at the impact location with sharp strain gradients.
Akil Hazizan, M. and Cantwell, W.J.2002. ‘‘The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures,’’Composites: Part B, 33:193-204.
2.
Anderson, T. and Madenci, E.2000. ‘‘Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites,’’ Compos Struct, 50:239-247.
3.
Avrashi, J., Dancygier, O. and Ishai, O.1995. ‘‘Damage tolerance of thick hybrid composite plate containing a local hemispherical damage,’’ Compos Struct, 33:227-236.
4.
Balageas, D., Bourasseau, S., Dupont, M., Bocherens, E., Dewynter-Marty, V. and Ferdinand, P.2000. ‘‘Comparison between nondestructive evaluation techniques and integrated fiber optic health monitoring systems for composite sandwich structures,’’ J Int Mater Sys Struct , 11:426-437.
5.
Caprino, G. and Teti, R.1994. ‘‘Impact and post-impact behavior of foam core sandwich structures,’’ Compos Struct, 27:47-55.
Garrett, R., Peters, K. and Zikry, M.A.2009. ‘‘In-situ impact-induced damage assessment of woven composite laminates through a fiber Bragg grating sensor network ,’’ J Royal Aeronautical Soc, 113:357-370.
8.
Hosur, M.V., Mohammed, A.A., Zainuddin, S. and Jeelani, S.2008. ‘‘Impact performance of nanophased foam core sandwich composites,’’ Mater Sci Eng, 489:100-109.
9.
Lee, L.J., Huang, K.Y. and Fann, Y.J.1993. ‘‘Dynamic response of composite sandwich plate impacted by a rigid ball,’’ J Compos Mater, 27:1238-1256.
10.
Leijten, J., Bersee, H.E.N., Bergsma, O.K. and Beukers, A.2009. ‘‘Experimental study of the low-velocity impact behaviour of primary sandwich structures in aircraft,’’ Composites Part A, 40:164-175.
11.
Maldague, X.P.V.2001. Theory and Practice of Infrared Technology for Nondestructive Testing, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
12.
Minakuchi, S., Okabe, Y., Mizutani, T. and Takeda, N.2009. ‘‘Barely visible impact damage detection in composite sandwich structures by optical-fiber-based distributed strain measurement,’’Smart Mater Struct, 18:085018.
13.
Minakuchi, S., Okabe, Y. and Takeda, N.2007. ‘‘Real-time detection of debonding between honeycomb core and facesheet using a small-diameter FBG sensor embedded in adhesive layer,’’ J Sandwich Struct Mater, 9:9-33.
14.
Nemes, J.A. and Simmonds, K.E.1992. ‘‘Low-velocity impact response of foam-core sandwich composites,’’ J Compos Mater, 26:500-519.
15.
Pearson, J.D., Zikry, M.A., Prabhugoud, M. and Peters, K.2007. ‘‘Global-local assessment of low-velocity impact damage in woven composites,’’ J Compos Mater, 41:2759-2783.
16.
Peters, K., Studer, M., Botsis, J., Iocco, A., Limberger, H. and Salathé , R.2001. ‘‘Embedded optical fiber Bragg grating sensor in a nonuniform strain field: Measurements and simulations,’’Experiment Mech, 41:19-28.
17.
Schubel, P.M., Lou, J.-J. and Daniel, I.M.2007. ‘‘Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels,’’ Composites: Part A, 38:1051-1057.
18.
Shipsha, A., Hallström, S. and Zenkert, D.2003. ‘‘Failure mechanisms and modeling of impact damage in sandwich beams-a 2D approach: Part 1-experimental investigation ,’’ J Sandwich Struct Mater, 5:7-31.
19.
Torre, L. and Kenny, J.M.2000. ‘‘Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation,’’ Compos Struct, 50:257-267.
20.
Vaidya, U.K., Nelson, S., Sinn, B. and Mathew, B.2001. ‘‘Processing and high strain rate impact response of multi-functional sandwich composites,’’ Compos Struct, 52:429-440.
21.
Wagreich, R.B., Atia, W.A., Singh, H. and Sirkis, J.S.1996. ‘‘Effects of diametric load on fibre Bragg gratings fabricated in low birefringent fibre,’’ Electronics Lett, 32:1223-1224.
22.
Wu, C.L. and Sun, C.T.1996. ‘‘Low velocity impact damage in composite sandwich beams,’’ Compos Struct, 34:21-27.
