Design and Functional Test of a Morphing High-Lift Device for a Regional Aircraft

Abstract

Several flight regimes occurring during a typical aircraft mission make it impossible to define a unique optimized wing configuration able to maximize aerodynamic efficiency, maneuverability, and stability in every flight condition. Components like ailerons and flaps, in some way, guarantee a certain level of adaptability, being far from optimal. Wing morphing can strongly improve the aerodynamic efficiency of future aircraft by assuring an optimal adaptive behavior which best fits the specific flight regime requirements. Such an approach, in spite of related benefits, presents a challenging problem: the same structure rigid enough to keep its shape under the aerodynamic loads has to largely deform itself without undergoing structural collapses. In the frame of a research project funded by Alenia Aeronautica S.p.A., the authors came to the definition of a novel morphing architecture acting as high-lift device.

In this study, the design assessment of an innovative flap architecture for a variable-camber trailing edge is illustrated. The reference geometry is based on a full-scale wing of a reference civil regional transportation aircraft, where the conventional flap component has been substituted by a morphing trailing edge based on compliant ribs. The presented architecture moves toward the direction of assuring high deformability while keeping good load-sustaining capabilities: each rib is composed of multiple, suitably shaped rigid elements connected by means of hinges and linking rods. The rib’s shape changes upon the activation of a smart actuator based on shape memory alloy technology. Design process of the morphing rib and integrated actuator structure has been widely discussed as well as the functional tests performed on a technological demonstrator manufactured in order to prove the goodness of chosen design strategies and adopted numerical models.

Keywords

morphing trailing edge variable camber morphing rib high-lift device smart actuator shape memory alloys.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, D. and Friswell, M.I. 2008. ‘‘The Design of Morphing Airfoils using Compliant Mechanisms,’’ In: Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies, 6-9 October, Ascona, Switzerland.

Barbarino, S. , Ameduri, S. and Pecora, R. 2007. ‘‘Wing Camber Control Architectures based on SMA: Numerical Investigation,’’ In: Proceedings of SPIE International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering (SMN2007), Vol. 6423, 64231E-1, 1-4 July, Harbin, China, 8pp., doi: 10.1117/12.779397.

Barbarino, S. , Lecce, L. , Concilio, A. , Ameduri, S. and De Rosa, L. 2010a. ‘‘A Novel Smart Actuator for Airfoil Structural Morphing: Test Campaign and Numerical Correlation,’’ submitted.

Barbarino, S. , Lecce, L. , Concilio, A. , Ameduri, S. and Russo, S. 2010b. ‘‘A Novel Smart Actuator for Airfoil Structural Morphing: Design and Optimization,’’ submitted.

Barbarino, S. , Pecora, R. , Lecce, L. , Concilio, A. , Ameduri, S. and Calvi, E. 2009. ‘‘A Novel SMA-Based Concept for Airfoil Structural Morphing,’’ Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 18:696-705.

Bilgen, O. , Kochersberger, K.B. , Inman, D.J. and OhanianIII, O.J. 2009. ‘‘Novel, Bi-Directional, Variable Camber Airfoil via Macro-Fiber Composite Actuators,’’ In: Proceedings of 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 4-7 May, Palm Springs, CA, AIAA-2009-2133.

Blondeau, J. and Pines, D. 2004. ‘‘Pneumatic Morphing Aspect Ratio Wing,’’ In: Proceedings of 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 19-22 April, Palm Springs, CA, AIAA-2004-1808.

Bowman, J. , Sanders, B. and Weisshaar, T. 2002. ‘‘Evaluating the Impact of Morphing Technologies on Aircraft Performance,’’ In: Proceedings of 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 22-25 April, Denver, CO, AIAA-2002-1631.

Campanile, L.F. and Sachau, D. 2000. ‘‘The Belt Rib concept. A Structronic Approach for Variable Camber,’’ Journal of Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures, 11:215-224.

10.

Chopra, I. 2002. ‘‘Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and Integrated Systems,’’ AIAA Journal, 40:2145-2187.

11.

Gevers, D.E. 1997. ‘‘Multi-Purpose Aircraft,’’ US Patent No. 5,645,250.

12.

Goldberg, D.E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc, Boston, MA.

13.

Hasse, A. and Campanile, L.F. 2009. ‘‘Design of Compliant Mechanisms with Selective Compliance,’’ Smart Materials and Structures, 18:115016.

14.

Ivanco, T.G. , Scott, R.C. , Love, M.H. , Zink, S. and Weisshaar, T.A. 2007. ‘‘Validation of the Lockheed Martin Morphing Concept with Wind Tunnel Testing,’’ In: Proceedings of 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 23-26 April, Honolulu, HI, AIAA-2007-2235.

15.

Katz, J. and Plotkin, A. 1991. Low Speed Aerodynamics, from Wing Theory to Panel Methods , 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.

16.

Kuethe, A.M. and Chow C.Y. 1986. Foundations of Aerodynamics: Bases of Aerodynamic Design , 4th edn, Ch. 4,6, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

17.

Lesieutre, G.A. , Frecker, M. and Mehta, V. 2008. ‘‘Compliant Frame: A New Paradigm to Enable Reconfigurable Aircraft Structures,’’ Air Force Office of Scientific Research Final Report, 28 February.

18.

Liang, C. and Rogers, C.A. 1990. ‘‘One-Dimensional Thermomechanical Constitutive Relations for Shape Memory Material,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1:207-234.

19.

McGowan, A.R. , Horta, L.G. , Harrison, J.S. and Raney, D.L. 1999. ‘‘Research Activities within NASA’s Morphing Program,’’ RTO Meeting Proceedings 36 (AC/323(AVT) TP/17) from the RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on ‘‘Structural Aspects of Flexible Aircraft Control’’, 18-20 October, pp. 13-1-13-10, Ottawa, AL, Canada.

20.

Monner, H.P. , Sachau, D. and Brietbach, E. 1999. ‘‘Design aspects of the Elastic Trailing Edge for an Adaptive Wing,’’ RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on Structural Aspects of Flexible Aircraft Control, 18-20 October, pp. 14-1-14-8, Ottawa, Canada.

21.

Moran, J. 1984. An Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics , John Wiley and Sons, New York .

22.

Richards, R. 2001. Principles of Solid Mechanics, ISBN 0-8493-0114-9, pp. 162-164, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.

23.

Shimizu, K. and Tadaki, T. 1987. ‘‘Shape Memory Effect: Mechanism,’’ In: Funakubo, H. (ed.), Shape Memory Alloys, pp. 1-60, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers , New York.

24.

Spillman, J. 1992. ‘‘The Use of Variable Chamber to Reduce Drag, Weight and Costs of Transport Aircraft,’’ Aeronautical Journal, 96:1-8.

25.

Stanewsky, E. 2001. ‘‘Adaptive Wing and Flow Control Technology,’’ Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 37:583-667.

26.

Stubbs, M.D. 2003. ‘‘Cinematic Design and Analysis of a Morphing Wing,’’ Master Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

27.

Wildschek, A. , Grünewald, M. , Maier, R. , Steigenberger, J. , Judas, M. , Deligiannidis, N. and Aversa, N. , 2008. ‘‘Multi-Functional Morphing Trailing Edge Device for Control of All-Composite, All-Electric Flying Wing Aircraft,’’ In: Proceedings of the 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 14-19 September, Anchorage, AK, AIAA-2008-8956.