Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The recently developed magnetorheological (MR) dampers serve as an ideal candidate for diverse applications including structural vibration suppression, shock absorption, and vibration control in vehicle systems. Previous research indicates that they are characterized with non-linear hysteresis and this was further testified in the present study. Various models have been proposed to interpret the complex characteristic, but they are plagued by certain limitations. In view of this, the present study sets out to propose a more efficient genetic algorithm (GA) and a simplified Bouc—Wen model. And it moves to adopt and improve the GA by some effective methods including effective selection methods, adaptive genetic operators and appropriate termination criteria. Then the simplified Bouc—Wen model is obtained by fixing the values of the insensitive parameters in the original model based on the sensitivity analysis theory. Finally, the experimental data of the MR damper responses verify that the proposed approaches are capable of efficient computations and accurate parameter estimation. Also suggested are the implications of the present study on other novel smart dampers.

Keywords

MR damper Bouc—Wen model parameter estimation sensitivity analysis genetic algorithm.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, J.E. 1987. ‘‘Reducing Bias and Inefficiency in the Selection Algorithm,’’ In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.

Choi, S.B. and Lee, S.K. 2001. ‘‘A Hysteresis Model for the Field-dependent Damping Force of a Magnetorheological Damper,’’ Journal of Sound and Vibration, 245:375-383.

Constantinou, M.C. and Adnane, M.A. 1987. ‘‘Dynamics of Soil-base-isolated Structure Systems: Evaluation of Two Models for Yielding Systems,’’ Report to NSAF, Department of Civil Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.

Eiben, A.E. , Hinterding, R. and Michalewicz, Z. 1999. ‘‘Parameter Control in Evolutionary Algorithms,’’ IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3:124-141.

Gamota, D.R. and Filisko, F.E. 1991. ‘‘Dynamic Mechanical Studies of Electrorheological Materials: Moderate Frequencies,’’ Journal of Rheology, 35:399-425.

Giuclea, M. , Sireteanu, T. , Stancioiu, D. and Stammers, C.W. 2004. ‘‘Model Parameter Identification of Vehicle Vibration Control with Magnetorheological Dampers Using Computational Intelligent Methods,’’ Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering , 218:569-581.

Goldberg, D. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.

Hamby, D.M. 1994. ‘‘A Review of Techniques for Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Models,’’ Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 32:135-154.

Holland, J.H. 1992. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial System, MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA.

10.

Iman, R.L. and Helton, J.C. 1991. ‘‘The Repeatability of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses for Complex Probabilistic Risk Assessments, ’’ Risk Analysis, 11:591-606.

11.

Kunnath, S.K. , Mander, J.B. and Fang, L. 1997. ‘‘Parameter Identification for Degrading and Pinched Hysteretic Structural Concrete Systems,’’ Engineering Structures, 19:224-232.

12.

Kwok, N.M. , Ha, Q.P. , Nguyen, M.T. and Samali, B. 2007. ‘‘Bouc-Wen Model Parameter Identification for a MR Fluid Damper Using Computationally Efficient GA, ’’ ISA Transactions, 46:167-179.

13.

Lin, J.S. and Zhang, Y. 1994. ‘‘Nonlinear Structural Identification Using Extended Kalman Filter,’’ Computers and Structures , 52:757-764.

14.

Ma, F. , Bockstedte, A. , Foliente, G.C. and Paevere, P. 2004. ‘‘Parameter Analysis of the Differential Model of Hysteresis,’’ Journal of Applied Mechanics ASME, 71:342-349.

15.

Ma, X.Q. , Wang, E.R. , Rakheja, S. and Su, C.Y. ( 2002). ‘‘Modeling Hysteretic Characteristics of MR-fluid Damper and Model Validation,’’ In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 2, pp. 1675-1680.

16.

Man, K.F. , Tang, K.S. and Kwong, S. 1999. Genetic Algorithms: Concepts and Designs, Springer, London, New York.

17.

Ni, Y.O. , Ko, J.M. and Wong, C.W. 1998. ‘‘Identification of Nonlinear Hysteretic Isolators from Periodic Vibration Tests,’’ Journal of Sound and Vibration, 217(4):737-756.

18.

Rudolph, G. 1994. ‘‘Convergence Analysis of Canonical Genetic Algorithms,’’ IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , 5(1): 96-101.

19.

Shames, I.H. and Cozzarelli, F.A. 1992. Elastic and Inelastic Stress Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

20.

Smyth, A.W. , Masri, S.F. , Kosmatopoulos, E.B. , Chassiakos, A.G. and Caughey, T.K. 2002. ‘‘Development of Adaptive Modeling Techniques for Non-linear Hysteretic Systems,’’ International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 37:1435-1451.

21.

Spencer, B.F. , Dyke, S.J. , Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. 1997. ‘‘Phenomenological Model for Magnetorheological Dampers,’’ Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123:230-238.

22.

Wen, Y.K. 1976. ‘‘Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems,’’ ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, 102(EM2):249-263.

23.

Yar, M. and Hammond, J.K. 1987. ‘‘Parameter Estimation for Hysteretic Systems ,’’ Journal of Sound and Vibration, 117(1): 161-172.

24.

Zhang, H. , Foliente, G.C. , Yang, Y.M. and Ma, F. 2002. ‘‘Parameter Identification of Inelastic Structures Under Dynamic Loads,’’ Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31:1113-1130.

25.

Zhang, L.X. , Huang, Y. , Liu, J. , Wang, X. and Gao, F. ( 1997). ‘‘A Method Identifying the Parameters of Bouc-Wen Hysteretic Nonlinear Model Based on Genetic Algorithm,’’ IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems, Beijing, pp. 62-65.

Parameter Estimation and its Sensitivity Analysis of the MR Damper Hysteresis Model Using a Modified Genetic Algorithm

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References