Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper explores the use of acoustic emission (AE) for damage location in steel composite bridges. Damage assessment of a steel-concrete composite bridge is obtained using conventional time-of-arrival location techniques in both global and local monitoring trials. The local monitoring aspect of the field investigation is simulated under laboratory conditions and waveforms acquired during both studies are compared. A Finite Element (FE) study of a component of the bridge is presented and compared with location results from the field study confirming regions of possible crack location. Laboratory studies on a 12 m I-beam are presented to explore the use of Lamb waves as an alternative location method to the current time of arrival (TOA) method. The presence and dispersive behaviour of the flexural and extensional Lamb modes in digitised AE signals is observed. The frequency characteristics of the two modes are compared and modal separation via bandpass frequency filtering is demonstrated. This separation is used to estimate the source-to-sensor distance. In addition, the viability of the Lamb wave method for AE source location over extended distances in a real structural component is investigated. Important considerations for the automated implementation of single sensor source location (SSSL) are outlined and a possible extension of the method to provide an insight into the origin of the source is introduced.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agerskov, H. and Nielsen, J.A. (1999). Fatigue in steel highway bridges in random loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 153–163.

Baron, J.A. and Ying, S.P. (1987). Acoustic Emission Source Location, Non-destructive Handbook. American Society for Non-destructive testing. Columbus: OH. Vol. 5, Section 6, 136–154.

Dunegan, H. (1997). Global flaw location with one transducer. The DECI Report.

Gorman, M.R. (1991). Plate wave acoustic emission. J. Acoustical Society of America, 90(1): 358–364.

Holford, K.M. , Carter, D.C. , Pullin, R. and Davies, A.W. (1999). Bridge integrity assessment by acoustic emission – Global monitoring. Proc. Identification in Engineering Systems. Swansea. pp. 392–400.

Maji, A.K. and Satpathi, D. (1995). Acoustic emission source location based on lamb waves. Engineering Mechanics, 1: 597–600.

Pollock, A.A. (1990). Critical problems for the AE researcher. J. of Acoustic Emission, 9(2): 140–141.

Prosser, W.H. (1997). Advanced AE techniques in composite materials research. J. of Acoustic Emission, 14(2): 1–11.

Rindorf, H.J. (1981). Acoustic Emission Source Location in Theory and Practise, Bruel and Kjaer Technical Review, No. 2, ISSN 0007–2621.

10.

Searle, I. , Ziola, S. and Rutherford, P. (1995). Crack detection in lapjoints using acoustic emission. SPIE Proceedings on Smart Structures and Materials, 2444: 212–223.

11.

Ziola, S. and Gorman, M.R. (1991). Source location in thin plates using cross-correlation. J. Acoustical Society of America, 90(5): 2551–2556.

Damage Location in Steel Bridges by Acoustic Emission

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References