This study explores adult learners’ perceptions of simulated interviews with artificial intelligence (AI) for understanding professional roles in the field of adult education as well as better understanding the capabilities and limitations of using AI as a learning tool. A total of forty-two adult learners across four sessions of the same asynchronous online graduate-level course engaged in the AI-driven simulation interview activity, followed by reflective discussions. Both sentiment analysis and thematic analysis of the data revealed predominantly positive attitudes toward using AI for learning through simulation interviews, emphasizing its efficiency, accessibility, and preparatory value in professional learning. While participants valued AI for its flexibility and immediate feedback, concerns were raised regarding the depth and authenticity of AI interactions, underlining its limitations as a sole learning tool. The findings highlight the potential of using AI to enhance learning, while indicating the critical need for integration with human interactions to maximize its educational benefits.
AdamM.WesselM.BenlianA. (2021). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7
2.
AnagnosteS.BiclesanuI.D’AscenzoF.SavastanoM. (2021). The role of chatbots in end-to-end intelligent automation and future employment dynamics. In Business revolution in a digital era: 14th international conference on business excellence, ICBE 2020 (pp. 287–302): Springer International Publishing.
3.
BabashahiL.BarbosaC. E.LimaY.LyraA.SalazarH.ArgôloM.AlmeidaM. A. d.SouzaJ. M. D. (2024). AI in the workplace: A systematic review of skill transformation in the industry. Administrative Sciences, 14(6), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060127
BrundageM. (2014). Limitations and risks of machine ethics. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2014.895108
6.
ChirgwinP. (2021). Skills development and training of future workers in mining automation control rooms. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4(1), Article 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100115
7.
ChouY. C.WongsoF. R.ChaoC. Y.YuH. Y. (2022). An AI mock-interview platform for interview performance analysis. In 2022 10th international conference on information and education technology (ICIET) (pp. 37–41). IEEE.
8.
CressU.KimmerleJ. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w
9.
da Cunha OliveiraM.MenezesM. S.de OliveiraY. C.BôasL. M. V.AguiarC. V. N.SilvaM. G. (2023). Novice medical students’ perception about bad news training with simulation and spikes strategy. PEC innovation, 2(1), Article 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100106
10.
FarajA. O. K. (2022). A proposal to employ artificial intelligence applications in developing Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University students’ future skills. Education Research International, 2022(1), 6433372. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6433372
11.
FitriaT. N. (2021). The use technology based on artificial intelligence in English teaching and learning. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6(2), 213–223.
12.
GratchJ.LucasG. M.KingA. A.MorencyL. P. (2014). It's only a computer: The impact of human-agent interaction in clinical interviews. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (pp. 85–92). ACM.
13.
HagertyA.RubinovI. (2019). Global AI ethics: A review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07892.
14.
HanJ.YooH.MyungJ.KimM.LeeT. Y.AhnS. Y.OhA.AnswerA. N. (2023). Exploring student-ChatGPT dialogue in EFL writing education. In Thirty-seventh conference on neural information processing systems, neural information processing systems foundation.
15.
HassanS. Z.SalehiP.RøedR. K.HalvorsenP.BaugerudG. A.JohnsonM. S.SabetS. S. (2022). Towards an AI-driven talking avatar in virtual reality for investigative interviews of children. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on games systems (pp. 9–15). ACM.
HeC.TengR.SongJ. (2023). Linking employees’ challenge-hindrance appraisals toward AI to service performance: The influences of job crafting, job insecurity and AI knowledge. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(3), 975–994. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2022-0848
KumarR.NaveenV.IllaP. K.PacharS.PatilP. (2023). The current state of software engineering employing methods derived from artificial intelligence and outstanding challenges. In 2023 1st international conference on innovations in high speed communication and signal processing (IHCSP) (pp. 105–108). IEEE.
20.
LeeB. C.KimB. Y. (2021). Development of an AI-based interview system for remote hiring. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering & Technology, 12(3), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.12.3.2021.060
21.
LinX.LuterbachK.GregogyK. H.SconyersS. E. (2024). A case study investigating the utlization of ChatGPT in online discussions. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4407
22.
LiuY.HanT.MaS.ZhangJ.YangY.TianJ.HeH.LiA.HeM.LiuZ.WuZ.ZhuD.QiangN.ShenD.LiuT.GeB. (2023). Summary of Chatgpt-related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology, 1(2), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017
23.
MeuserM.NagelU. (2009). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In BognerA.LittieB. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 17–42). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
24.
NofalA. B.AliH.HadiM.AhmadA.QayyumA.JohriA.Al-FuqahaA.QadirJ. (2025). AI-enhanced interview simulation in the metaverse: Transforming professional skills training through VR and generative conversational AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(1), Article 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100347
25.
NovO.SinghN.MannD. (2023). Putting ChatGPT’s medical advice to the (Turing) test: Survey study. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), Article e46939. https://doi.org/10.2196/46939
StamerT.SteinhäuserJ.FlägelK. (2023). Artificial intelligence supporting the training of communication skills in the education of health care professions: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), Article e43311. https://doi.org/10.2196/43311
28.
SuenH. Y.HungK. E.LinC. L. (2020). Intelligent video interview agent used to predict communication skill and perceived personality traits. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-020-0208-3
29.
ThornbergR.CharmazK. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 153–169). Sage.
30.
TuR.MaC.ZhangC. (2023). Causal-discovery performance of chatgpt in the context of neuropathic pain diagnosis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13819.
31.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
YadollahiA.ShahrakiA. G.ZaianeO. R. (2017). Current state of text sentiment analysis from opinion to emotion mining. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3057270
34.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). Sage.
