The current study addressed two problems in adult education: the lack of published research on the use of ePortfolios in graduate adult education, and more specifically, how can graduate adult educators utilize ePortfolios to foster reflective and deeper learning in a graduate adult education program? This was a 3-year qualitative study of 36 master’s students in their final capstone course in an online graduate adult education program. The primary research question was Can developing ePortfolios foster reflective and deeper learning in an online graduate adult education program? Researchers analyzed student responses to three guideline questions for the development of their ePortfolios: (a) What story did your ePortfolio tell?, (b) What surprised you?, and (c) What did you learn about yourself? These questions were designed to stimulate students’ thinking about their learning from the ePortfolio process, artifacts, and experience in the degree program. Through thematic analysis of student responses to these questions, three predominant themes emerged that provided evidence for reflective and deeper learning. The three themes were as follows: (a) Students became more reflective learners who frequently experienced deeper transformative learning, (b) Students were surprised by greater self-discovery and significant personal growth exceeding their expectations, and (c) Students found new personal strengths. Specific recommendations were provided about how to use ePortfolios in graduate adult education programs to foster reflective and deeper learning.
AhernK. J. (1999). Pearls, pith, and provocation: Ten tips for reflective bracketing. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239900900309
3.
BarrettH. C. (2010). Balancing the two faces of ePortfolios. Educacao, Formação & Tecnologias, 3(1), 6–14.
4.
BlaschkeL. M.BrindleyJ. E. (2011). Establishing a foundation for reflective practice: A case study of learning journal use. European Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 14(2).
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BrookfieldS. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey Bass.
7.
BuyarskiC. A.AaronR. W.HansenM.HollingsworthC. D.JohnsonC. A.KahnS.LandisC. M.PetersonJ. S.PowellA. (2015). Purpose and pedagogy: A conceptual model for an ePortfolio. Theory Into Practice, 54(4), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.107669
8.
CrantonP. (2016). Understanding and promoting transformative learning (3rd. ed.). Sense Publishing.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
10.
CzerkawskiB. C. (2014). Designing deeper learning experiences for online instruction. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(2), 29–40.
11.
DeneenC. C.ShroffR. (2014). Understanding successes and difficulties in program-level ePortfolios: A case study of two professional degree programs. Review of Higher Education and Self Learning, 7(24), 145–160.
12.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think: A re-statement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath.
13.
DeweyJ. (1997). Experience and education. Touchstone.
EynonB.GambinoL. M. (Eds.). (2017). High impact e-Portfolio practice: A catalyst for student, faculty, and institutional learning (1st ed., pp. viixi). Stylus.
16.
EynonB.GambinoL. M.TörökJ. (2014). What difference can e-Portfolio make? A field report from the connect to learning project. International Journal of E-portfolio, 4(1), 95–114. http://www.theijep.com/pdf/ijep127.pdf
17.
FarrellA.SeeryO. (2019). “I am not simply learning and regurgitating information, I am also learning about myself”: Learning portfolio practice and online distance students. Distance Education, 40:1, 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553565
18.
FinlayL. (2008). Reflecting on “reflective practice.” (Practice-based Professional Learning Paper 52). The Open University.
19.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233–252.
20.
HarringK.LuoT. (2016). Eportfolios: Supporting reflection and deep learning in high-impact practices. Peer Review: Association of American Colleges & Universities, 18(3), 9–12.
KlenowskiV.AskewS.CarnellE. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment, and professional development in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500352816
23.
KuhG. D. (2008). High-Impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
24.
KuhG. D. (2017). Foreword: And now there are 11. In EynonB.GambinoL. M.KuhG. D. (Eds.), High impact e-Portfolio practice: A catalyst for student, faculty, and institutional learning (1st ed., pp. viixi). Stylus.
25.
MerrillH. S. (2015, November). Investigating reflective learning in capstone portfolios. In Proceedings of Research-to-practice in Adult, Continuing and Higher Education Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
26.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think as an adult; Core concepts of transformation theory. In MezirowJ. & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). Jossey-Bass.
27.
MoonJ. (1999). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Routledge.
28.
MorrealeC.Van Zale-TamsenC.EmersonC.A.HerzogM. (2017). Thinking skills by design: Using a capstone portfolio to promote reflection, critical thinking, and curriculum integration. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(1), 13–28.
29.
ReynoldsC.PattonJ. (2014). Leveraging the e-Portfolio for integrative learning: A faculty guide to classroom practices for transforming student learning. Stylus.
30.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE.
31.
RogersR. R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37–57.
32.
RowleyJ.MundayJ. (2014). A “sense of self” through reflective thinking in e-Portfolios. International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Education, 1(7), 78–85. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v1-i7/9.pdf
33.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
34.
Slepcevic-ZachP.StockM. (2018). ePortfolio as a tool for reflection and self-reflection. International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 19(3), 291–307.
35.
VagleM. D. (2014). Crafting phenomenological research. Left Coast Press.
36.
WatsonC. E.KuhG.RhodesT.Penny LightT.ChenH. L. (2016). Editorial: e-Portfolios—The eleventh high impact practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(2), 65–69. http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP254.pdf
37.
WeberK.MyrickK. (2018). Reflecting on reflecting: Summer undergraduate research students’ experiences in developing electronic portfolios, a meta-high impact practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 8(1), 13–25.
38.
YanceyK. B. (2009). Reflection and electronic portfolios: Inventing the self and reinventing the university. In CambridgeD.CambridgeB.YanceyK. (Eds.), Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact (pp. 5–16). Stylus.
39.
ZubizarretaJ. (2004). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning. Anker.
