Practitioners use an expansive array of instructional design models. Although many of these models acknowledge the need for analyzing occupational roles, they do not define steps for conducting these analyses. This article reviews prominent models and provides prescriptive guidance for selecting appropriate models given a project’s (a) Product Requirements, (b) Resource Availability, and (c) Philosophical Compatibility with DACUM (Developing a CurriculUM) procedures.
AdamsR. E.HoganR. L.SteinkeL. J. (2015). DACUM: The seminal book. Wilmington, DE: Edwin & Associates.
2.
AllenM. W. (2003). Michael Allen’s guide to e-learning: Building interactive, fun, and effective learning programs for any company. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
3.
AllenM. W. (2012). Leaving ADDIE for SAM: An agile model for developing the best learning experiences. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development Press.
4.
BrownA.GreenT. D. (2011). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
5.
DennisonJ. D. (1995). Challenge and opportunity: Canada’s community colleges at the crossroads. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
6.
DickW.CareyL.CareyJ. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson.
