Although prior research has indicated a relationship between educational climate and educational outcomes, there is a lack of research in this area in adult literacy programs. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to assess the actual and perceived educational climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual (LGBT) students at an adult literacy program. Interview data from four heterosexual students, five LGBT students, and three heterosexual teachers were thematically analyzed. Students perceived the educational climate to be one of both comfort and discomfort, and teachers perceived it to be one of only discomfort for LGBT students. Sources of discomfort were twofold: implicit through lack of acceptance and silencing in the curricula, and explicit through actual and perceived harassment. Multiple implications for adult literacy educators and researchers are discussed.
AhlstromC. (1999). Putting lesbian and gay families in the picture. In MersonM.ReuysS. (Eds.), Taking Risks. Connections: A Journal of Adult Literacy (Vol. 8, pp. 18-22). Boston, MA: Adult Literacy Resource Institute.
2.
BrownR. D.ClarkeB.GortmakerV.Robinson-KeiligR. (2004). Assessing the campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and Transgender (GLBT) students using a multiple perspectives approach. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 8-26.
3.
California Safe Schools Coalition & 4-H Center for Youth Development, University of California, Davis. (2004). Consequences of harassment based on actual or perceived sexual orientation and gender non-conformity and step to making schools safer. Davis: University of California, Davis.
4.
CatalanoR. F.HaggertyK. P.OesterieS.FlemingC. B.HawkinsJ. D. (2004). The importance of bonding to schools for healthy development: Findings from the social development research group. The Journal of School Health, 74, 252-262.
5.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
deMarraisK.LapanS. (2004). Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
FedeleM. (2002). Addressing diversity: Gay, lesbian, bisexual & transgendered concerns in the adult education classroom. Literacy Update, 11(8), 1-9.
8.
FreibergH. J. (Ed.). (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
GraybillE. C. (2011). Social justice advocacy trends related to Gay/Straight Alliance advisors’ experiences in schools (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3471655)
11.
GriffinP.LeeC.WaughJ.BeyerC. (2004). Describing roles that gay-straight alliances play in schools: From individual support to school change. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 1(3), 7-22.
12.
HillR. J. (2003, June). Pressing policy issues: Safe and supportive opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer learners in higher education. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, San Francisco State University, CA.
13.
HillR. J. (2006). What’s it like to be queer here?New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 112, 7-16.
14.
HogeD. R.SmitE. K.HansonS. L. (1990). School experiences predicting changes in self-esteem of sixth and seventh-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 117-127.
15.
KosciwJ. G. (2004). The 2003 national school climate survey: The school-related experiences of our nation’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. New York, NY: Gay, Lesbian, & Straight Education Network (GLSEN).
16.
KumashiroK. K. (2001). Troubling intersections of race and sexuality: Queer students of color and anti-oppressive education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
LasaterB.ElliotB. (2005). Profiles of the adult education target population. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education, Division of Adult Education and Literacy.
MisawaM. (2015). Cuts and bruises caused by arrows, sticks and stones in academia: Theorizing three types of racist and homophobic bullying in adult and higher education. Adult Learning, 26, 5-13.
20.
MobleyS. D.JohnsonJ. M. (2015). The role of HBCUs in addressing the unique needs of LGBT students. New Directions for Higher Education, 2015(170), 79-89.
RankinS. R. (2006). LGBTQA students on campus: Is higher education making the grade?Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 3, 111-117.
23.
RemafediG. (1987). Adolescent homosexuality: Psychosocial and medical implications. Pediatrics, 79, 331-337.
24.
RobinsonJ. P.EspelageD. L. (2011). Inequalities in educational and psychological outcomes between LGBTQ and straight students in middle and high school. Educational Researcher, 40, 315-330.
25.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
WangW.VaillancourtT.BrittainH. L.McDougallP.KrygsmanA.SmithD.. . . HymelS. (2014). School climate, peer victimization, and academic achievement: Results from a multi-informant study. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 360-377.
27.
WolffJ. R.HimesH. L. (2010). Purposeful exclusion of sexual minority youth in Christian higher education: The implications of discrimination. Christian Higher Education, 9, 439-460.
28.
Zamani-GallaherE. M.ChoudhuriD. D. (2011). A primer on LGBTQ students at community colleges: Considerations for research and practice. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011(155), 35-49.
29.
ZubernisL.SnyderM. (2007). Considerations of additional stressors and developmental issues for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 22, 75-79.
