Participating in a doctoral program can be a transformative experience that shapes the identity of the learner. What learning spaces might best facilitate that identity development? This article presents the findings of a study examining doctoral student perspectives of participating in a Community of Practice (COP) intentionally used to foster emerging scholar identities. The researchers examined the actual experience of the participants, explored the impact on their identities as scholars, and, finally, compared with other types of similar teaching models. The findings suggest identities shifted and self-efficacy increased among all the participants in the COP. In addition, the power of this model may be most important in the area of continuity and continued growth a year after the class ended.
ConceiçãoS. C. O. (2013). Skills needed to survive and thrive as a scholar in the 21st century: Information, knowledge, and publication management. Adult Learning, 24, 175-178.
6.
HébertT. P.BeardsleyT. M. (2001). Jermaine: A critical case study of a gifted Black child living in rural poverty. In MerriamS. B. (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 201-232). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
HerringtonJ.OliverR.ReevesT. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 59-71.
8.
JacksonL.MacIsaacD. (1994). Introduction to a new approach in experiential learning. In JacksonL.CaffarellaR. S. (Eds.), Experiential learning: A new approach: New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (62 ed., pp. 17-28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
KaswormC. E.RoseA. D.Ross-GordonJ. M. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of adult and continuing education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
KimY. S.MerriamS. B. (2010). Situated learning and identity development in Korean older adults’ computer classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 60, 438-455.
11.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR.BaumgartnerL. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
MitchellS. K. (1979). Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 376-390.
15.
MonaghanC. H. (2011). Communities of practice: A learning strategy for professional development. Journal of Management Education, 35, 428-453.
16.
NevinA. I.ThousandJ. S.VillaR. A. (2011). Working with coauthors. In RoccoT. S.HatcherT. (Eds.), The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 274-292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
PutmanP. G. (2012). Virtual simulation in leadership development training: The impact of learning styles and conflict management tactics on adult learner performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/6?109406907693919:P0_SEARCH:NO:
18.
RoccoT. S.HatcherT. (2011). The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
SfardA.PrusakA. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
20.
TaylorJ. E. (2006). From practice to theory: Reflections on a journey from practice to academia. Adult Learning, 17(1-4), 19-23.
21.
WengerE.McDermottR.SnyderW. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
WooY.HerringtonJ.AgostinhoS.ReevesT. C. (2007). Implementing authentic tasks in web-based learning environments. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(3), 36-43.
