AhennA. (2007). What are the perceptions of lecturers towards using cooperative learning in civil engineering?European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 517–526. doi: 10.1080/03043790701433152.
2.
AlaviS. B.McCormickJ. (2008). The roles of perceived task interdependence and group members' interdependence in the development of collective efficacy in university student group contexts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 375–393. Retrieved from http://www.bpsjournals.co.uk/journals/bjep/.
3.
BarfieldR. L. (2003). Students' perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 355–369. dio: 10.1080/0260293032000066191.
4.
BanerjiS. (2007). Employers say college graduate lack essential skills to succeed in today's global economy. Issues in Higher Education, 23(26), 18. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/.
5.
BrooksC. M.AmmonsJ. L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assignments. Journal of Education for Business, 78(5), 268–272. Retrieved from http://www.heldref.org/pubs/jeb/about.html.
6.
BoydJ.BoydS. (2005). Reflect and improve in instructional development through a teaching journal. College Teaching, 53(3), 110–114. Retrieved from http://www.heldref.org/pubs/ct/about.html.
7.
ColbeckC. L.CampbellS.E.BjorklundS. A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 60–83. Retrieved from http://www.ohiostatepress.org/Journals/JHE/jhemain.htm.
8.
DesivilyaH. S.EizenD. (2005). Conflict management in work teams: The role of social self-efficacy and group identification. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(2), 186–208. dio: 10.1108/eb022928.
9.
FinegoldA. R.CookeL. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, experiences, and dynamics of interaction in online groups. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 201–215. dio: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.00.
10.
FordM.JewelsT. (2008). Highs and lows of implementing a management strategy eliminating “free passengers” in group projects. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 5, 1–10. Retrieved from http://iisit.org/.
11.
GooldA.AugarN.FarmerJ. (2006). Learning in virtual teams: Exploring the student experience. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 477–490. Retrieved from http://jite.org/.
12.
HansonR. S. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82(1), 11–19. Retrieved from http://www.heldref.org/pubs/jeb/about.html.
13.
JeongA.LeeJ. M. (2008). The effects of active versus reflective learning styles on the process of critical discourse in computer supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 651–665. dio: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00762.x.
14.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SmithK. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Education Psychology Review, 19, 15–29. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8.
15.
MaguireS.EdmondsonS. (2001). Student evaluation and assessment of group projects. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25(2), 209–217. dio:.
16.
PaulusT. M. (2005). Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work” The impact of task type. Distance Education, 26(1), 11–125. dio: 10.1080/01587910500081343.
17.
PayneB. K.Monk-TurnerE. (2006). Students' perceptions of group projects: The role of race, age, and slacking. College Student Journal, 40(1), 132–139. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/csj.html.
18.
RobertsT. S.McInnerneyJ. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 257–268. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/.
19.
RovaiA. P.BarnumK. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57–73. Retrieved from http://www.deanz.org.nz/journal/index.html.
20.
ShiueY.ChiuC.ChangC. (2010). Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 768–777. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.014.
UnderwoodJ. D. (2003). Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. British Journal of Psychology, 94(3), 319–337. Retrieved from http://www.bpsjournals.co.uk/journals/bjp/.
26.
VentorK. (2003). Coping with isolation: The role of culture in adult distance learners' use of surrogates. Open Learning, 18(3), 271–287. dio: 10.1080/0268051032000131035.
27.
YaziciH. J. (2004). Student perceptions of collaborative learning in operations management classes. Journal of Education for Business, 80(2), 110–118. Retrieved from http://www.heldref.org/pubs/jeb/about.html.