Adult Numeracy Network. (2005). Teaching and learning principles. The Math Practitioner, 11(2), 2.
2.
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (1995). Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus.Memphis, TN: AMATYC.
3.
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (2006). Beyond crossroads: Implementing mathematics standards in the first two years of college.Memphis, TN: AMATYC.
4.
LeonelliE.SchwendemanR. (1994). The Massachusetts adult basic education math standards, volume 1.Boston, MA: The Massachusetts Department of Education.
5.
Mathematical Association of America. (2004). Undergraduate programs and courses in the mathematical-sciences: CUPM curriculum guide 2004.Washington, DC: MAA.
6.
Mathematical Association of America. (2009). Calculation vs. context: Quantitative literacy and its implications for teacher education.Washington DC: MAA.
7.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
8.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM.
9.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM.
10.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM.
11.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM.
13.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics panel.Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
14.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
National Research Council. (1990). A challenge of numbers: People in the mathematical sciences.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
National Research Council. (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
OrrillR. (2008). Humanism and quantitative literacy. In MadisonB. L. (Ed.), Calculation vs. content-Quantitative literacy and its implications for teacher education (pp. 47–57). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
18.
Safford-RamusK. (2008). Unlatching the gate: Helping adult students learn mathematics.Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.
19.
Safford-RamusK. (2009). What mathematics should adults learn? Adult mathematics instruction as a corollary to two decades of school mathematics reform. In Safford-RamusK. (Ed.), A declaration of numeracy: Empowering adults through mathematics education.Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
20.
SteenL. A. (Ed.). (1997). Why numbers count-Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America.New York: The College Board.
21.
SteenL. A. (Ed.). 2001. Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy.Washington, DC: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
22.
SteenL. A. (2008). Reflections on Wingspread workshop. In Madison,B. L.SteenL. A. (Eds.), Calculation vs. content: Quantitative literacy and its implications for teacher education (pp. 11–23). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
23.
SteinJ. (Ed.). (1975). The random house college dictionary, (Revised ed.). New York: Random House.
24.
SteinS. (2000). Equipped for the future content standards: What adults need to know and be able to do in the 21st century.Washington, DC: The National Institute for Literacy.