Programs to reunice children in state custody with their families and communities have not proliferated to the same extent as have programs designed to prevent placement. Although reunification is generally recognized as a more complex and formidable undertaking, the nature and extent of the obstacles to reunification are not fully understood. The authors report on five major systems barriers to reunification that were identified through a pilot case management project in a midwestern state. Knowledge of these obstacles can help officials create a context in which reunification programs have optimal opportunity to succeed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenM. (1992, Fall). Redefining family reunification. In The prevention report (pp. 5–7). Iowa City, IA: National Resource Center on Family-Based Services.
2.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (1992). The Annie E. Casey Foundation 1992 annual report.Greenwich, CT: Author.
3.
BorgmanR. (1985). The influence of family visiting upon boys’ behavior in a juvenile correctional institution. Child Welfare, 64, 629–638.
4.
BrunerC. (1989). State innovations in children and family service collaboration and financing. In RoningC. (Ed.), Family policy: Recommendations for state action (pp. 163–171). Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislators.
5.
DeikerT. (1986). How to ensure that the money follows the patient: A strategy for funding community services. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 37, 256–260.
6.
DiorioW. (1992). Parental perceptions of the authority of public child welfare caseworkers. Families in Society, 73, 222–235.
7.
FeinE., & StaffI. (1993). Last best change: Findings from a reunification services program. Child Welfare, 72, 25–40.
8.
FrankelH. (1988). Family centered, home based services in child protection: A review of the research. Social Services Review, 62, 137–157.
9.
FriesenB. J., & KoroloffN. (1990). Family centered services: Implications for mental health administration and research. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 13–25.
10.
GeorgeR. M. (1990). The reunification process in substitute care. Social Service Review, 64, 422–457.
11.
GordonD. A., ArbuthnotJ., GustafsonK. E., & McGreenP. (1988). Home-based behavioral-systems family therapy with disadvantaged juvenile delinquents. American Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 243–255.
12.
HessP. M., & FolaronG. (1991). Ambivalences: A challenge to permanency for children. Child Welfare, 70, 403–424.
13.
JenningsM. A., & McDonaldT. P. (1993). Assessing the impact of citizen review boards.Lawrence, KS: School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas.
14.
KaganR., ReidW. J., RobertsS. E., & Silverman-PollowJ. (1987). Engaging families of court-mandated youths in an alternative to institutional placement. Child Welfare, 66, 365–376.
15.
KriegerR., MaluccioA., & PineB. (1991). Teaching family reunification: A sourcebook.West Hartford, CT: Center for the Study of Child Welfare, University of Connecticut.
16.
LahtiJ. (1982). A follow-up study of foster children in permanent placements. Social Service Review, 56, 556–571.
17.
McDonaldT., & MarksJ. (1991). A review of risk factors assessed in child protective services. Social Service Review, 65, 112–132.
18.
PetrC. G., & BarneyD. (1993). Reasonable efforts for children with disabilities: The parent perspective. Social Work, 35, 247–255.
19.
PetrC. G., & EntrikenC. (1993). Sedgwick County Pilot Reunification Project.Topeka, KS: Corporation for Change.
20.
PetrC. G., & SpanoR. (1990). Evolution of social services for children with emotional disorders. Social Work, 35, 228–234.
21.
PoertnerJ., & RonnauJ. (1992). A strengths approach to children with emotional disabilities. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), A strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 111–121). New York: Longman.
22.
RappC. A., & MooreT. (1993). The Kansas mental health reform act: Legislation that works.Lawrence, KS: School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas.
23.
SchwartzI. M. (1992). Juvenile justice and public policy: Toward a national agenda.New York: Lexington Books.
24.
TaricoV. S., LowB. P., TrupinE., & Forsyth-StephensA. (1989). Children's mental health services: A parent perspective. Community Mental Health Journal, 25, 313–326.
25.
TurnbullA., & TurnbullH. (Eds.). (1990). Families, professionals and exceptionality: A special partnership (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles H. Merrill.
26.
TurnbullH., & TurnbullA. (1985). Parents speak out, then and now.Columbus, OH: Charles H. Merrill.
27.
WaltonE., FraserM. W., LewisR. E., PecoraP. J., & WaltonW. K. (1993). In-home family-focused reunification: An experimental study. Child Welfare, 72, 473–487.
28.
WellsK., & BiegelD. E. (Eds.). (1991). Family preservation services: Research and evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
WhitakerJ. K., KinneyJ., TracyE. M., & BoothC. (1990). Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
