The postmodern movement has had a dramatic influence on the family therapy field and on social work, forcing a reexamination of long-held assumptions about assessment and intervention. The author explores how these ideas are being applied in the field of family therapy and the implications of this body of thought for social work practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ. (1993). The constructivist paradigm: Values and ethics. In LairdJ. (Ed.), Revisioning social work education: A social constructionist approach (pp. 31–54). New York: Haworth.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, IDC: Author.
3.
AndersenT. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.
4.
AndersenT. (Ed.). (1991). The reflecting team: Dialogues and dialogues about the dialogues.New York: W. W. Norton.
5.
AndersonH., & GoolishianH. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27, 371–394.
6.
AndersonH., & GoolishianH. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In McNameeS. & GergenK. J., Therapy as social construction (pp. 25–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind.New York: Ballantine.
8.
BowenM. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice.New York: Jason Aronson.
9.
Boyd-FranklinN. (1989). Black families in therapy: A multisystems approach.New York: Guilford.
10.
CarterB., & McGoldrickM. (Eds.). (1980). The family life cycle: A framework for family therapy.New York: Gardner Press.
11.
CarterB., & McGoldrickM. (Eds.). (1988). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy.New York: Gardner Press.
12.
CecchinG. (1992). In McNameeS. & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 86–95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
ComptonB., & GalawayB. (1979). Social work processes (rev.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
14.
CrawfordS. (1987). Lesbian families: Psychosocial stress and the family-building process. In Boston Lesbian Psychologies Collective (Eds.), Lesbian psychologies: Explorations and challenges (pp. 195–214). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
15.
DeanR. (1993). Constructivism: An approach to clinical practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 63, 126–146.
16.
de ShazerS. (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy.New York: W. W. Norton.
17.
EfranJ., & ClarfieldL. (1992). Constructionist therapy: Sense and nonsense. In McNameeS. & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 200–217). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
FalicovC. (1983). Cultural perspectives in family therapy.Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Publications.
19.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish.New York: Vintage.
FramoJ. (1976). Family of origin as a therapeutic resource for adults in marital and family therapy: You can and should go home again. Family Process, 15, 193–210.
22.
GeertzC. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
23.
GergenK. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in American psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
24.
GergenK. J., & KayeJ. (1992). Beyond narrative in the negotiation of therapeutic meaning. In McNameeS. & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 166–185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
GermainC. G. (1979). Social work practice: People and environments.New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
GermainC., & GittermanA. (1980). The life model of social work practice.New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
GoldnerV. (1985). Feminism and family therapy. Family Process, 24, 27–31.
28.
GoldnerV. (1988). Generation and gender: Normative and covert hierarchies. Family Process, 27, 17–31.
29.
GoodrichT. J., RampageC., EllmanB., & HalsteadK. (1988). Feminist family therapy: A casebook.New York: WW Norton.
HamiltonG. (1951). Theory and practice of social casework (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
Hare-MustinR. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process, 17, 181–194.
33.
Hare-MustinR. (1987). The problem of gender in family therapy theory. Family Process, 26, 15–33.
34.
Hare-MustinR. (1994). Discourses in the mirrored room: A postmodern analysis of therapy. Family Process, 33, 19–35.
35.
HartmanA. (1974). The generic stance and the family agency. Social Casework, 55, 199–208.
36.
HartmanA., & LairdJ. (1983). Family-centered social work practice.New York: Free Press.
37.
HillmanJ., & VenuraM. (1993). We've had a hundred years of psychotherapy and the world's getting worse.San Francisco: Harper Collins.
38.
HoffmanL. (1985). Beyond power and control: Toward a “second order” family systems therapy. Family Systems Medicine, 3, 381–396.
39.
HoffmanL. (1992). A reflexive stance for family therapy. In McNameeS. & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 7–24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
40.
HollisF. (1964). Casework: A psychosocial therapy.New York: Random House.
41.
HudsonW. H. (1982). Scientific imperatives in social work research and practice. Social Service Review, 56, 246–258.
42.
KeeneyB. (1983). Aesthetics of change.New York: Guilford.
43.
LairdJ. (1989). Women and stories: Restorying women's self-constructions. In McGoldrickM., AndersonC., & WalshF. (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 422–450). New York: W. W. Norton.
44.
LairdJ. (1992). Women's secrets—women's silences. In Imber-BlackE. (Ed.), Secrets in families and in family therapy.New York: W. W. Norton.
45.
LairdJ. (1993a). Lesbian and gay families. In WalshF. (Ed.), Normal family processes (2nd ed., pp. 282–328). New York: Guilford.
46.
LairdJ. (1993b). Revisioning social work education: A social constructionist approach.New York: Haworth.
47.
LairdJ. (1994). “Thick description” revisited: Family therapist as anthropologist-constructivist. In ShermanE. & ReidW. (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 175–189). New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
LaxW. (1992). Postmodern thinking in a clinical practice. In McNameeS. & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 69–85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
MaturanaH. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 1–24.
51.
McGoldrickM., PearceJ., & GiordanoJ. (1982). Ethnicity and family therapy.New York: Guilford.
52.
McNameeS., & GergenK. J. (1992). Therapy as social construction.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
53.
MeyerC. (1993). Assessment in social work.New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
MinuchinS. (1974). Families and family therapy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
MinuchinS. (1991). The seductions of constructivism. Family Therapy Networker, 15(5), 47–50.
56.
MinuchinS., & FishmanH. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
MOSAIC Project. (1994). Not alone. (Videotape).Athal, MA: People's Bridge Action.
58.
NapierA., & WhitakerC. (1978). The family crucible.New York: Harper and Row.
59.
PappP. (1983). The process of change.New York: Guilford.
60.
PennP., & FrankfurtM. (1994). Creating a participant text: Writing, multiple voices, narrative multiplicity. Family Process, 33, 217–231.
61.
RhodesM. (1986). Ethical dilemmas in social work practice.Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
62.
RichmondM. (1917). Social diagnosis.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
63.
RothS., ChasinL., ChasinR., BeckerG., & HerzigM. (1992). From debate to dialogue: A facilitating role for family therapists in the public forum. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, No. 2, 41–48.
64.
SatirV. (1967). Conjoint family therapy (rev. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
65.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner.New York: Basic Books.
66.
Selvini-PalazzoliM., BoscoloL., CecchinG., & PrataG. (1980a). The problem of the referring person. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 6, 3–9.
67.
Selvini-PalazzoliM., BoscoloL., CecchinG., & PrataG. (1980b). Hypothesizing—circularity—neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19, 3–12.
68.
SpenceD. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth.New York: W.W. Norton.
69.
WaldegraveC. (1990). Social justice and family therapy. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 5–47.
70.
WatzlawickP., WeaklandJ., & FischR. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formulation and problem resolution.New York: W. W. Norton.
71.
WeickA. (1993). Reconstructing social work education. In LairdJ. (Ed.), Revisioning social work education: A social constructionist approach (pp. 11–30). New York: Haworth.
72.
WhiteM. (1989). The process of questioning: A therapy of literary merit. In WhiteM., Selected papers (pp. 37–46). Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
73.
WhiteM. (1992a). Deconstruction and therapy. In EpstonD. & WhiteM., Experience, contradiction, narrative and imagination: Selected papers of David Epston and Michael White, 1989–1991 (pp. 109–151). Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
74.
WhiteM. (1992b, October). Recent developments in the narrative approach. Workshop at the American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy, Miami, FL.
75.
WhiteM. (1994). The politics of therapy: Putting to rest the illusion of neutrality. (Mimeographed). Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Family Centre.
76.
WhiteM., & EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends.New York: W. W. Norton.
